需要一个村庄:在加纳北部开展交叉随机试验,以加强孕期保健和支持。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Aleksandra Jakubowski, Raymond Akawire Aborigo, Irene Kuwolamo, Jesse D Meredith, Aaron Asibi Abuosi
{"title":"需要一个村庄:在加纳北部开展交叉随机试验,以加强孕期保健和支持。","authors":"Aleksandra Jakubowski, Raymond Akawire Aborigo, Irene Kuwolamo, Jesse D Meredith, Aaron Asibi Abuosi","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal mortality remains a challenge in Ghana, where 263 women per 100 000 live births die during pregnancy or childbirth. Barriers to reaching the recommended antenatal care (ANC) include poor access to quality health care, cultural factors, and lack of support for pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We piloted two cross-randomized interventions: durbars, or local community meetings that incorporated education about ANC and supporting pregnant women, and an enhanced ANC model that added phone calls and a home visit to standard care. The study took place in 30 villages in the Upper East Region of Ghana between August 2021 and November 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We tracked 277 women during pregnancy, with 120 women randomly assigned to the enhanced ANC intervention and 142 women living in villages randomized to the durbar intervention. Women who were randomized to the enhanced ANC intervention were 13.2 percentage points (pp) (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1, 24.3) more likely to have average or above average knowledge of pregnancy danger signs, 22.1 pp (95% CI = 9.1, 36.5) more likely to have a birth plan, 28.2 pp (95% CI = 13.0, 42.4) more likely to prepare the plan with their partners, and 16.4 pp (95% CI = 0.9, 29.3) more likely to pay for delivery with funds set aside in birth plan. They were also 35 pp (95% CI = 16.1, 48.1) more likely to make blood donor arrangements than control women who made birth plans. We found no impact of the durbar intervention on study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence from this pilot suggests that interventions that increase interactions between health providers and pregnant women outside of the health facility may substantially improve women's experience during pregnancy and maternal health outcomes. Providing structured ways for men to get engaged in ANC increased their involvement. Although we found no evidence the community meetings improved study outcomes, larger studies with repeated meetings and community-wide surveys are needed to make causal conclusions.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>American Economic Association RCT Registry: 10360; ISCRNT: ISRCTN95961119.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04217"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It takes a village: A pilot cross-randomized trial to enhance pregnancy care and support in northern Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Jakubowski, Raymond Akawire Aborigo, Irene Kuwolamo, Jesse D Meredith, Aaron Asibi Abuosi\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.14.04217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal mortality remains a challenge in Ghana, where 263 women per 100 000 live births die during pregnancy or childbirth. Barriers to reaching the recommended antenatal care (ANC) include poor access to quality health care, cultural factors, and lack of support for pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We piloted two cross-randomized interventions: durbars, or local community meetings that incorporated education about ANC and supporting pregnant women, and an enhanced ANC model that added phone calls and a home visit to standard care. The study took place in 30 villages in the Upper East Region of Ghana between August 2021 and November 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We tracked 277 women during pregnancy, with 120 women randomly assigned to the enhanced ANC intervention and 142 women living in villages randomized to the durbar intervention. Women who were randomized to the enhanced ANC intervention were 13.2 percentage points (pp) (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1, 24.3) more likely to have average or above average knowledge of pregnancy danger signs, 22.1 pp (95% CI = 9.1, 36.5) more likely to have a birth plan, 28.2 pp (95% CI = 13.0, 42.4) more likely to prepare the plan with their partners, and 16.4 pp (95% CI = 0.9, 29.3) more likely to pay for delivery with funds set aside in birth plan. They were also 35 pp (95% CI = 16.1, 48.1) more likely to make blood donor arrangements than control women who made birth plans. We found no impact of the durbar intervention on study outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence from this pilot suggests that interventions that increase interactions between health providers and pregnant women outside of the health facility may substantially improve women's experience during pregnancy and maternal health outcomes. Providing structured ways for men to get engaged in ANC increased their involvement. Although we found no evidence the community meetings improved study outcomes, larger studies with repeated meetings and community-wide surveys are needed to make causal conclusions.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>American Economic Association RCT Registry: 10360; ISCRNT: ISRCTN95961119.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"04217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04217\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在加纳,孕产妇死亡率仍然是一项挑战,每 10 万名活产婴儿中就有 263 名妇女死于妊娠或分娩。实现建议的产前保健(ANC)的障碍包括难以获得高质量的医疗保健服务、文化因素以及孕妇缺乏支持:我们试行了两种交叉随机干预措施:一种是当地社区会议,其中包括有关产前保健和支持孕妇的教育;另一种是增强型产前保健模式,在标准护理的基础上增加了电话和家访。研究于 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 11 月期间在加纳上东部地区的 30 个村庄进行:我们对 277 名孕期妇女进行了跟踪调查,其中 120 名妇女被随机分配到增强型产前护理干预措施中,142 名居住在村庄中的妇女被随机分配到杜巴干预措施中。被随机分配到强化产前护理干预措施的妇女对怀孕危险信号的了解达到平均水平或高于平均水平的可能性要高出 13.2 个百分点(95% 置信区间 (CI) = 0.1, 24.3),达到平均水平或高于平均水平的可能性要高出 22.1 个百分点(95% 置信区间 (CI) = 9.1, 36.5)更有可能制定分娩计划,28.2 个百分点(95% 置信区间 = 13.0, 42.4)更有可能与伴侣一起准备分娩计划,16.4 个百分点(95% 置信区间 = 0.9, 29.3)更有可能用分娩计划中预留的资金支付分娩费用。与制定了分娩计划的对照组妇女相比,她们安排献血的可能性也高出 35 pp (95% CI = 16.1, 48.1)。我们没有发现杜巴干预对研究结果有任何影响:这项试点研究的证据表明,在医疗机构外增加医疗服务提供者与孕妇之间互动的干预措施可能会大大改善妇女的孕期经历和孕产妇健康结果。为男性提供参与产前护理的结构化方法提高了他们的参与度。虽然我们没有发现社区会议改善了研究结果的证据,但需要通过重复会议和全社区调查进行更大规模的研究,才能得出因果关系的结论:注册:美国经济协会 RCT 注册:10360;ISCRNT:ISRCTN95961119。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
It takes a village: A pilot cross-randomized trial to enhance pregnancy care and support in northern Ghana.

Background: Maternal mortality remains a challenge in Ghana, where 263 women per 100 000 live births die during pregnancy or childbirth. Barriers to reaching the recommended antenatal care (ANC) include poor access to quality health care, cultural factors, and lack of support for pregnant women.

Methods: We piloted two cross-randomized interventions: durbars, or local community meetings that incorporated education about ANC and supporting pregnant women, and an enhanced ANC model that added phone calls and a home visit to standard care. The study took place in 30 villages in the Upper East Region of Ghana between August 2021 and November 2022.

Results: We tracked 277 women during pregnancy, with 120 women randomly assigned to the enhanced ANC intervention and 142 women living in villages randomized to the durbar intervention. Women who were randomized to the enhanced ANC intervention were 13.2 percentage points (pp) (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1, 24.3) more likely to have average or above average knowledge of pregnancy danger signs, 22.1 pp (95% CI = 9.1, 36.5) more likely to have a birth plan, 28.2 pp (95% CI = 13.0, 42.4) more likely to prepare the plan with their partners, and 16.4 pp (95% CI = 0.9, 29.3) more likely to pay for delivery with funds set aside in birth plan. They were also 35 pp (95% CI = 16.1, 48.1) more likely to make blood donor arrangements than control women who made birth plans. We found no impact of the durbar intervention on study outcomes.

Conclusions: Evidence from this pilot suggests that interventions that increase interactions between health providers and pregnant women outside of the health facility may substantially improve women's experience during pregnancy and maternal health outcomes. Providing structured ways for men to get engaged in ANC increased their involvement. Although we found no evidence the community meetings improved study outcomes, larger studies with repeated meetings and community-wide surveys are needed to make causal conclusions.

Registration: American Economic Association RCT Registry: 10360; ISCRNT: ISRCTN95961119.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信