探索远程管理基于表现的功能评估。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Applied Gerontology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1177/07334648241292968
Audrey A Keleman, Rebecca M Bollinger, Juleen Rodakowski, Chih-Hung Chang, Abigail L Kehrer-Dunlap, Beau M Ances, Susan L Stark
{"title":"探索远程管理基于表现的功能评估。","authors":"Audrey A Keleman, Rebecca M Bollinger, Juleen Rodakowski, Chih-Hung Chang, Abigail L Kehrer-Dunlap, Beau M Ances, Susan L Stark","doi":"10.1177/07334648241292968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Performance-based assessments of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) can detect subtle functional impairments better than self-reported questionnaires. While most performance-based IADL assessments were developed for in-person administration, remote administration could increase access to vulnerable older adults. This study compared in-person and remote administration of IADL tasks from the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills. Community-dwelling older adults completed tasks (shopping, checkbook balancing, and medication management) at baseline (in-person) and follow-up (either in-person or remote, with modifications) two years later. Scores between the two follow-up groups, change in scores from baseline to follow-up, and differential item functioning (DIF) between the two administration methods at follow-up were examined. There were no differences in scores between methods of administration, but remote tasks took longer, and one item had significant DIF (<i>ps</i> < .01). Clinicians found remote administration acceptable and feasible. With minor adaptations, remote administration of the three tasks was supported. Further validation research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"981-993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Remote Administration of a Performance-Based Functional Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Audrey A Keleman, Rebecca M Bollinger, Juleen Rodakowski, Chih-Hung Chang, Abigail L Kehrer-Dunlap, Beau M Ances, Susan L Stark\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07334648241292968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Performance-based assessments of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) can detect subtle functional impairments better than self-reported questionnaires. While most performance-based IADL assessments were developed for in-person administration, remote administration could increase access to vulnerable older adults. This study compared in-person and remote administration of IADL tasks from the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills. Community-dwelling older adults completed tasks (shopping, checkbook balancing, and medication management) at baseline (in-person) and follow-up (either in-person or remote, with modifications) two years later. Scores between the two follow-up groups, change in scores from baseline to follow-up, and differential item functioning (DIF) between the two administration methods at follow-up were examined. There were no differences in scores between methods of administration, but remote tasks took longer, and one item had significant DIF (<i>ps</i> < .01). Clinicians found remote administration acceptable and feasible. With minor adaptations, remote administration of the three tasks was supported. Further validation research is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"981-993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018588/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648241292968\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648241292968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与自我报告问卷相比,基于表现的工具性日常生活活动(IADL)评估能更好地发现细微的功能障碍。虽然大多数基于表现的 IADL 评估都是为面对面施测而开发的,但远程施测可以让更多易受伤害的老年人受益。本研究对自理能力表现评估中的 IADL 任务进行了现场和远程管理的比较。居住在社区的老年人在基线(面对面)和两年后的随访(面对面或远程,经修改)中完成了任务(购物、平衡支票簿和药物管理)。研究人员考察了两个随访组之间的得分、从基线到随访的得分变化,以及随访时两种管理方法之间的项目功能差异(DIF)。两种施测方法的得分没有差异,但远程施测花费的时间更长,而且有一个项目存在显著的 DIF(ps < .01)。临床医生认为远程管理是可以接受和可行的。只要稍作调整,三项任务的远程管理都能得到支持。还需要进一步的验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Remote Administration of a Performance-Based Functional Assessment.

Performance-based assessments of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) can detect subtle functional impairments better than self-reported questionnaires. While most performance-based IADL assessments were developed for in-person administration, remote administration could increase access to vulnerable older adults. This study compared in-person and remote administration of IADL tasks from the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills. Community-dwelling older adults completed tasks (shopping, checkbook balancing, and medication management) at baseline (in-person) and follow-up (either in-person or remote, with modifications) two years later. Scores between the two follow-up groups, change in scores from baseline to follow-up, and differential item functioning (DIF) between the two administration methods at follow-up were examined. There were no differences in scores between methods of administration, but remote tasks took longer, and one item had significant DIF (ps < .01). Clinicians found remote administration acceptable and feasible. With minor adaptations, remote administration of the three tasks was supported. Further validation research is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信