恢复室病人出院评分系统比较:叙述性综述。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Khadija El Aoufy, Carolina Forciniti, Yari Longobucco, Alberto Lucchini, Ilaria Mangli, Camilla Elena Magi, Enrico Bulleri, Cristian Fusi, Paolo Iovino, Pasquale Iozzo, Nicoletta Rizzato, Laura Rasero, Stefano Bambi
{"title":"恢复室病人出院评分系统比较:叙述性综述。","authors":"Khadija El Aoufy, Carolina Forciniti, Yari Longobucco, Alberto Lucchini, Ilaria Mangli, Camilla Elena Magi, Enrico Bulleri, Cristian Fusi, Paolo Iovino, Pasquale Iozzo, Nicoletta Rizzato, Laura Rasero, Stefano Bambi","doi":"10.3390/nursrep14040205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The recovery room (RR) is a hospital area where patients are monitored in the early postoperative period before being transferred to the surgical ward or other specialized units. The utilization of scores in the RR context facilitates the assignment of patients to the appropriate ward and directs necessary monitoring. Some scoring systems allow nurses to select patients who can be discharged directly to their homes.</p><p><strong>Aim and methods: </strong>The aim of this narrative review was to describe and compare the scoring systems employed to discharge postoperative patients from RR, with a focus on item characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine scoring systems were identified and discussed: the \"Aldrete Score System\" and its modified version, the \"Respiration, Energy, Alertness, Circulation, Temperature Score\", the \"Post Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System\", the \"White and Song Score\", the \"Readiness for Discharge Assessment Tool\", the \"Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Service Checklist\", the \"Post-Anesthetic Care Tool\", the \"Post-operative Quality Recovery Scale\", and the \"Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition\" instrument.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>To obtain a comprehensive overview, the items included in the scoring systems were compared. Despite the availability of guidelines for patients' discharge readiness from the RR, there is no universally recommended scoring system. Next-generation scores must be improved to ease their use, minimize errors, and increase safety. The main goals of the scores included in this narrative review were to be simple to use, feasible, intuitive, comprehensive, and flexible. However, these goals frequently conflict because patient assessment takes time, and a smart and comprehensive score may not consider some clinical parameters that may be crucial for the discharge decision. Therefore, further research should be conducted on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison among Score Systems for Discharging Patients from Recovery Rooms: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Khadija El Aoufy, Carolina Forciniti, Yari Longobucco, Alberto Lucchini, Ilaria Mangli, Camilla Elena Magi, Enrico Bulleri, Cristian Fusi, Paolo Iovino, Pasquale Iozzo, Nicoletta Rizzato, Laura Rasero, Stefano Bambi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep14040205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The recovery room (RR) is a hospital area where patients are monitored in the early postoperative period before being transferred to the surgical ward or other specialized units. The utilization of scores in the RR context facilitates the assignment of patients to the appropriate ward and directs necessary monitoring. Some scoring systems allow nurses to select patients who can be discharged directly to their homes.</p><p><strong>Aim and methods: </strong>The aim of this narrative review was to describe and compare the scoring systems employed to discharge postoperative patients from RR, with a focus on item characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine scoring systems were identified and discussed: the \\\"Aldrete Score System\\\" and its modified version, the \\\"Respiration, Energy, Alertness, Circulation, Temperature Score\\\", the \\\"Post Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System\\\", the \\\"White and Song Score\\\", the \\\"Readiness for Discharge Assessment Tool\\\", the \\\"Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Service Checklist\\\", the \\\"Post-Anesthetic Care Tool\\\", the \\\"Post-operative Quality Recovery Scale\\\", and the \\\"Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition\\\" instrument.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>To obtain a comprehensive overview, the items included in the scoring systems were compared. Despite the availability of guidelines for patients' discharge readiness from the RR, there is no universally recommended scoring system. Next-generation scores must be improved to ease their use, minimize errors, and increase safety. The main goals of the scores included in this narrative review were to be simple to use, feasible, intuitive, comprehensive, and flexible. However, these goals frequently conflict because patient assessment takes time, and a smart and comprehensive score may not consider some clinical parameters that may be crucial for the discharge decision. Therefore, further research should be conducted on this topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:恢复室(RR)是医院的一个区域,病人在术后早期转入外科病房或其他专业病房之前,都要在这里接受监测。在恢复室使用评分系统有助于将病人分配到合适的病房,并进行必要的监测。有些评分系统允许护士选择可以直接出院回家的患者:本叙述性综述旨在描述和比较用于 RR 术后患者出院的评分系统,重点关注项目特征:结果:确定并讨论了九种评分系统:Aldrete 评分系统 "及其修改版、"呼吸、能量、警觉、循环、体温评分"、"麻醉后出院评分系统"、"White 和 Song 评分"、"出院准备评估工具"、"麻醉和围术期医学服务检查表"、"麻醉后护理工具"、"术后质量恢复量表 "和 "识别麻醉后过渡准备 "工具。讨论和结论:为了全面了解情况,我们对评分系统中包含的项目进行了比较。尽管有关于患者从 RR 出院准备情况的指南,但并没有普遍推荐的评分系统。下一代评分系统必须加以改进,以方便使用、减少错误并提高安全性。本叙事性综述中包含的评分的主要目标是简单易用、可行、直观、全面和灵活。然而,这些目标经常会发生冲突,因为患者评估需要时间,而智能而全面的评分可能不会考虑某些对出院决定至关重要的临床参数。因此,应就这一主题开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison among Score Systems for Discharging Patients from Recovery Rooms: A Narrative Review.

Introduction: The recovery room (RR) is a hospital area where patients are monitored in the early postoperative period before being transferred to the surgical ward or other specialized units. The utilization of scores in the RR context facilitates the assignment of patients to the appropriate ward and directs necessary monitoring. Some scoring systems allow nurses to select patients who can be discharged directly to their homes.

Aim and methods: The aim of this narrative review was to describe and compare the scoring systems employed to discharge postoperative patients from RR, with a focus on item characteristics.

Results: Nine scoring systems were identified and discussed: the "Aldrete Score System" and its modified version, the "Respiration, Energy, Alertness, Circulation, Temperature Score", the "Post Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System", the "White and Song Score", the "Readiness for Discharge Assessment Tool", the "Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Service Checklist", the "Post-Anesthetic Care Tool", the "Post-operative Quality Recovery Scale", and the "Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition" instrument.

Discussion and conclusions: To obtain a comprehensive overview, the items included in the scoring systems were compared. Despite the availability of guidelines for patients' discharge readiness from the RR, there is no universally recommended scoring system. Next-generation scores must be improved to ease their use, minimize errors, and increase safety. The main goals of the scores included in this narrative review were to be simple to use, feasible, intuitive, comprehensive, and flexible. However, these goals frequently conflict because patient assessment takes time, and a smart and comprehensive score may not consider some clinical parameters that may be crucial for the discharge decision. Therefore, further research should be conducted on this topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信