老年人髋臼骨折的年龄调整查尔森合并症指数。

Q3 Medicine
J M Bogallo, C Castillejo, A Ramirez, J R Cano, F Rivas-Ruiz, E Guerado
{"title":"老年人髋臼骨折的年龄调整查尔森合并症指数。","authors":"J M Bogallo, C Castillejo, A Ramirez, J R Cano, F Rivas-Ruiz, E Guerado","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze factors of comorbidity in older patients with acetabular fracture to know the role of disease in the treatment of this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Level 2 Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>A prospective database of acetabular fractures in patients over 55 years between January 2011 and January 2021 was studied. The exclusion criteria were age, pathological fracture, associated pelvic or hip fracture, follow-up of less than one year, and not having a computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Patients were categorised as low (0-2), intermediate (3-4) or high (≥5) risk according to the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). The primary outcomes were risk of complications, number of complications and mortality at one year according to the ACCI scale. The difference between the pre-fracture Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the one-year follow-up was also analysed. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were performed and ROC curves were constructed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 patients with acetabular fracture were collected. Ninety-eight out of those met inclusion criteria for our study. In regard to ACCI groups, 22% were low-risk, 26% were intermediate-risk, and 52% were high-risk. Statistically significant differences were found according to age, sex, mechanism of injury, treatment type, surgical treatment type, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score, readmissions, complications, and mortality. ROC curves showed an association between ACCI and CFS in terms of complications and mortality, with the exception of unadjusted Charlson comorbidity index. On the multivariable regression analysis, associations were found between ACCI and presence of complications (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.77, p=0.015) and mortality (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04-1.67, p=0.025) and between CFS and complications (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.30-3.11, p=0.001) and mortality (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35, p=0.019). No statistical correlation was established between ASA and complications or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presurgical ACCI and CFS scales may serve as a risk assessment method in treatment decision-making for patients with acetabular fracture. An association is observed between patients with a pre-fracture ACCI score ≥5 (high-risk) and a pre-fracture CFS score >4 (mild frailty) and mortality and complications at one year.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in acetabular fracture in geriatric acetabular fractures.\",\"authors\":\"J M Bogallo, C Castillejo, A Ramirez, J R Cano, F Rivas-Ruiz, E Guerado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.recot.2024.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze factors of comorbidity in older patients with acetabular fracture to know the role of disease in the treatment of this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Level 2 Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>A prospective database of acetabular fractures in patients over 55 years between January 2011 and January 2021 was studied. The exclusion criteria were age, pathological fracture, associated pelvic or hip fracture, follow-up of less than one year, and not having a computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Patients were categorised as low (0-2), intermediate (3-4) or high (≥5) risk according to the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). The primary outcomes were risk of complications, number of complications and mortality at one year according to the ACCI scale. The difference between the pre-fracture Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the one-year follow-up was also analysed. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were performed and ROC curves were constructed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 patients with acetabular fracture were collected. Ninety-eight out of those met inclusion criteria for our study. In regard to ACCI groups, 22% were low-risk, 26% were intermediate-risk, and 52% were high-risk. Statistically significant differences were found according to age, sex, mechanism of injury, treatment type, surgical treatment type, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score, readmissions, complications, and mortality. ROC curves showed an association between ACCI and CFS in terms of complications and mortality, with the exception of unadjusted Charlson comorbidity index. On the multivariable regression analysis, associations were found between ACCI and presence of complications (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.77, p=0.015) and mortality (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04-1.67, p=0.025) and between CFS and complications (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.30-3.11, p=0.001) and mortality (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35, p=0.019). No statistical correlation was established between ASA and complications or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presurgical ACCI and CFS scales may serve as a risk assessment method in treatment decision-making for patients with acetabular fracture. An association is observed between patients with a pre-fracture ACCI score ≥5 (high-risk) and a pre-fracture CFS score >4 (mild frailty) and mortality and complications at one year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.10.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2024.10.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在分析老年髋臼骨折患者的合并症因素:本研究旨在分析老年髋臼骨折患者的合并症因素,以了解疾病在该人群治疗中的作用:设计:回顾性队列研究:设计:回顾性队列研究:单一二级创伤中心。患者选择标准:研究对象为2011年1月至2021年1月期间55岁以上髋臼骨折患者的前瞻性数据库。排除标准:年龄、病理性骨折、伴有骨盆或髋部骨折、随访时间少于一年、未进行计算机断层扫描。结果测量和比较:根据年龄调整后的查尔森合并症指数(ACCI),患者被分为低(0-2)、中(3-4)和高(≥5)风险。根据 ACCI 分级,主要结果是并发症风险、并发症数量和一年后的死亡率。此外,还分析了骨折前临床虚弱度量表(CFS)与一年随访结果之间的差异。研究人员进行了描述性分析和多变量回归分析,并绘制了ROC曲线:结果:共收集了 119 例髋臼骨折患者。结果:共收集了 119 例髋臼骨折患者,其中 98 例符合我们的研究纳入标准。在 ACCI 组别中,22% 为低风险,26% 为中风险,52% 为高风险。根据年龄、性别、受伤机制、治疗类型、手术治疗类型、临床虚弱量表(CFS)评分、再入院率、并发症和死亡率,我们发现了统计学上的明显差异。ROC曲线显示,ACCI与CFS在并发症和死亡率方面存在关联,但未经调整的Charlson合并症指数除外。多变量回归分析显示,ACCI 与并发症(OR 1.37,95%CI 1.06-1.77,p=0.015)和死亡率(OR 1.32,95%CI 1.04-1.67,p=0.025)之间存在关联,CFS 与并发症(OR 2.01,95%CI 1.30-3.11,p=0.001)和死亡率(OR 1.59,95%CI 1.08-2.35,p=0.019)之间存在关联。ASA与并发症或死亡率之间没有统计学相关性:结论:术前ACCI和CFS量表可作为髋臼骨折患者治疗决策的风险评估方法。骨折前ACCI评分≥5分(高风险)和骨折前CFS评分>4分(轻度虚弱)的患者与一年后的死亡率和并发症之间存在关联:证据级别:预后:回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in acetabular fracture in geriatric acetabular fractures.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze factors of comorbidity in older patients with acetabular fracture to know the role of disease in the treatment of this population.

Methods: Design: retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single Level 2 Trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: A prospective database of acetabular fractures in patients over 55 years between January 2011 and January 2021 was studied. The exclusion criteria were age, pathological fracture, associated pelvic or hip fracture, follow-up of less than one year, and not having a computed tomography.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Patients were categorised as low (0-2), intermediate (3-4) or high (≥5) risk according to the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). The primary outcomes were risk of complications, number of complications and mortality at one year according to the ACCI scale. The difference between the pre-fracture Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the one-year follow-up was also analysed. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were performed and ROC curves were constructed.

Results: A total of 119 patients with acetabular fracture were collected. Ninety-eight out of those met inclusion criteria for our study. In regard to ACCI groups, 22% were low-risk, 26% were intermediate-risk, and 52% were high-risk. Statistically significant differences were found according to age, sex, mechanism of injury, treatment type, surgical treatment type, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score, readmissions, complications, and mortality. ROC curves showed an association between ACCI and CFS in terms of complications and mortality, with the exception of unadjusted Charlson comorbidity index. On the multivariable regression analysis, associations were found between ACCI and presence of complications (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.77, p=0.015) and mortality (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04-1.67, p=0.025) and between CFS and complications (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.30-3.11, p=0.001) and mortality (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35, p=0.019). No statistical correlation was established between ASA and complications or mortality.

Conclusion: Presurgical ACCI and CFS scales may serve as a risk assessment method in treatment decision-making for patients with acetabular fracture. An association is observed between patients with a pre-fracture ACCI score ≥5 (high-risk) and a pre-fracture CFS score >4 (mild frailty) and mortality and complications at one year.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信