世界卫生组织非洲地区卫生专业人员教育认证的证据:范围界定审查协议。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Catherine Nakidde, Debora Marletta, Gerry McGivern, Catherine O'Keeffe, Ann Griffin
{"title":"世界卫生组织非洲地区卫生专业人员教育认证的证据:范围界定审查协议。","authors":"Catherine Nakidde, Debora Marletta, Gerry McGivern, Catherine O'Keeffe, Ann Griffin","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map and examine the extent and type of available evidence on health professionals' education accreditation within Africa.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The demand for health professionals is unprecedentedly high globally. One response to this challenge has been expanding training through more liberal education policies, facilitating private sector participation in education service provision. Some evidence suggests that this is a double-edged sword, increasing quantity but compromising the quality of health professionals produced. Regulation can provide a framework to assure and continuously improve quality, with such regulation in place in 79% of World Health Organization African countries. However, it is unclear how much and what evidence has been generated on how accreditation happens, where it is concentrated, and the prevailing evidence gaps within this region; therefore, we propose to conduct a scoping review.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include articles and dissertations focusing on the accreditation of health professionals' education in Africa. All methodological approaches and designs will be included. Conference abstracts and protocols will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be carried out according to the JBI scoping review methodology. We conducted an initial search of CINAHL and MEDLINE to identify relevant articles. This informed our selection of keywords, along with index terms, to create a comprehensive search strategy for CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), ERIC (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, and Scopus. Sources included will be limited to those published starting from 2000 onwards. Data will be presented using tables and charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Detail of this review project can be found in open science framework: </strong>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W5G7T.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Nakidde, Debora Marletta, Gerry McGivern, Catherine O'Keeffe, Ann Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map and examine the extent and type of available evidence on health professionals' education accreditation within Africa.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The demand for health professionals is unprecedentedly high globally. One response to this challenge has been expanding training through more liberal education policies, facilitating private sector participation in education service provision. Some evidence suggests that this is a double-edged sword, increasing quantity but compromising the quality of health professionals produced. Regulation can provide a framework to assure and continuously improve quality, with such regulation in place in 79% of World Health Organization African countries. However, it is unclear how much and what evidence has been generated on how accreditation happens, where it is concentrated, and the prevailing evidence gaps within this region; therefore, we propose to conduct a scoping review.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include articles and dissertations focusing on the accreditation of health professionals' education in Africa. All methodological approaches and designs will be included. Conference abstracts and protocols will be excluded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will be carried out according to the JBI scoping review methodology. We conducted an initial search of CINAHL and MEDLINE to identify relevant articles. This informed our selection of keywords, along with index terms, to create a comprehensive search strategy for CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), ERIC (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, and Scopus. Sources included will be limited to those published starting from 2000 onwards. Data will be presented using tables and charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Detail of this review project can be found in open science framework: </strong>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W5G7T.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本范围界定综述旨在对非洲卫生专业人员教育认证方面现有证据的范围和类型进行规划和研究:全球对卫生专业人员的需求空前高涨。应对这一挑战的办法之一是通过更加宽松的教育政策扩大培训,促进私营部门参与教育服务的提供。一些证据表明,这是一把双刃剑,虽然增加了数量,但却降低了培养卫生专业人员的质量。监管可以提供一个确保并不断提高质量的框架,世界卫生组织 79% 的非洲国家都有这种监管。然而,目前还不清楚关于评审如何进行、评审集中在哪些地方以及该地区普遍存在的证据差距的证据有多少、有哪些;因此,我们建议进行一次范围界定综述:本综述将包括关注非洲卫生专业人员教育认证的文章和论文。所有方法和设计都将包括在内。方法:本综述将按照 JBI 范围综述方法进行。我们对 CINAHL 和 MEDLINE 进行了初步检索,以确定相关文章。这为我们选择关键词和索引术语提供了依据,从而为 CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、MEDLINE (Ovid)、Global Health (Ovid)、ERIC (EBSCOhost)、Web of Science Core Collection、Embase 和 Scopus 制定了全面的检索策略。收录的资料来源仅限于 2000 年以后发表的资料。数据将以表格和图表的形式呈现,并附有叙述性摘要。有关本综述项目的详细信息,请参阅开放科学框架:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W5G7T。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol.

Objective: This scoping review aims to map and examine the extent and type of available evidence on health professionals' education accreditation within Africa.

Introduction: The demand for health professionals is unprecedentedly high globally. One response to this challenge has been expanding training through more liberal education policies, facilitating private sector participation in education service provision. Some evidence suggests that this is a double-edged sword, increasing quantity but compromising the quality of health professionals produced. Regulation can provide a framework to assure and continuously improve quality, with such regulation in place in 79% of World Health Organization African countries. However, it is unclear how much and what evidence has been generated on how accreditation happens, where it is concentrated, and the prevailing evidence gaps within this region; therefore, we propose to conduct a scoping review.

Inclusion criteria: This review will include articles and dissertations focusing on the accreditation of health professionals' education in Africa. All methodological approaches and designs will be included. Conference abstracts and protocols will be excluded.

Methods: This review will be carried out according to the JBI scoping review methodology. We conducted an initial search of CINAHL and MEDLINE to identify relevant articles. This informed our selection of keywords, along with index terms, to create a comprehensive search strategy for CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), ERIC (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, and Scopus. Sources included will be limited to those published starting from 2000 onwards. Data will be presented using tables and charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.

Detail of this review project can be found in open science framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W5G7T.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信