{"title":"药剂师处方荷尔蒙避孕药:佐治亚州社区药剂师和非社区药剂师的看法调查。","authors":"Rebecca H Stone, Megha D Patel, Lara L Beene","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12050156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception (HC) is supported by a majority of pharmacists and pharmacy students; however, few studies have evaluated perceptions of non-community pharmacists, or differences in geographic areas. The primary objective of this study is to assess differences between community and non-community pharmacists in perceptions of pharmacist-prescribing HC in Georgia, a state that does not currently permit this practice. Secondary objectives include assessment of community pharmacist interest in prescribing HC, and differences in perceptions between pharmacists in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas. A survey was emailed in early 2022 to 2592 Georgia pharmacists, with Likert questions assessing interest, perceptions, comfort, and perceived barriers regarding pharmacist-prescribed HC. Chi square testing identified differences between groups. The completed survey response rate was 11.8%. Regardless of practice site, a majority agreed that pharmacists are well trained to prescribe HC (community 61.8% vs. non-community 68.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.25) and provision of HC services is within pharmacists' scope (community 73.6% vs. non-community 74.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.90). Overall, metropolitan and nonmetropolitan community pharmacist perceptions were similar; however, more metropolitan pharmacists believed pharmacists are well trained to prescribe HC (66.7% vs. 48.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.049) and that it is within their scope of practice (78.1% vs. 61.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.045). In summary, the majority of pharmacists, regardless of practice type, believe that pharmacists are prepared to prescribe HC and that it is a part of pharmacists' professional scope of practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacist-Prescribed Hormonal Contraception: A Survey of Perceptions of Georgia Community Pharmacists and Non-Community Pharmacists.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca H Stone, Megha D Patel, Lara L Beene\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pharmacy12050156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception (HC) is supported by a majority of pharmacists and pharmacy students; however, few studies have evaluated perceptions of non-community pharmacists, or differences in geographic areas. The primary objective of this study is to assess differences between community and non-community pharmacists in perceptions of pharmacist-prescribing HC in Georgia, a state that does not currently permit this practice. Secondary objectives include assessment of community pharmacist interest in prescribing HC, and differences in perceptions between pharmacists in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas. A survey was emailed in early 2022 to 2592 Georgia pharmacists, with Likert questions assessing interest, perceptions, comfort, and perceived barriers regarding pharmacist-prescribed HC. Chi square testing identified differences between groups. The completed survey response rate was 11.8%. Regardless of practice site, a majority agreed that pharmacists are well trained to prescribe HC (community 61.8% vs. non-community 68.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.25) and provision of HC services is within pharmacists' scope (community 73.6% vs. non-community 74.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.90). Overall, metropolitan and nonmetropolitan community pharmacist perceptions were similar; however, more metropolitan pharmacists believed pharmacists are well trained to prescribe HC (66.7% vs. 48.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.049) and that it is within their scope of practice (78.1% vs. 61.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.045). In summary, the majority of pharmacists, regardless of practice type, believe that pharmacists are prepared to prescribe HC and that it is a part of pharmacists' professional scope of practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510790/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12050156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12050156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大多数药剂师和药学专业学生都支持由药剂师开具荷尔蒙避孕处方 (HC);然而,很少有研究对非社区药剂师的看法或地域差异进行评估。本研究的主要目的是评估佐治亚州社区药剂师和非社区药剂师对药剂师开具 HC 处方的看法差异,佐治亚州目前还不允许药剂师开具 HC 处方。次要目标包括评估社区药剂师对开具 HC 处方的兴趣,以及大都市地区和非大都市地区药剂师在看法上的差异。2022 年初,我们通过电子邮件向 2592 名佐治亚州药剂师发送了一份调查问卷,其中的李克特问题主要评估药剂师开具 HC 处方的兴趣、看法、舒适度以及感知到的障碍。通过卡方检验确定了组间差异。完成调查的回复率为 11.8%。无论执业地点如何,大多数人都认为药剂师在开具 HC 方面训练有素(社区 61.8% vs. 非社区 68.1%,p = 0.25),而且提供 HC 服务属于药剂师的职责范围(社区 73.6% vs. 非社区 74.2%,p = 0.90)。总体而言,大都市和非大都市社区药剂师的看法相似;但是,更多大都市药剂师认为药剂师受过良好的开具 HC 处方的培训(66.7% 对 48.7%,p = 0.049),而且这属于他们的执业范围(78.1% 对 61.5%,p = 0.045)。总之,无论执业类型如何,大多数药剂师都认为药剂师做好了开具 HC 处方的准备,而且 HC 处方属于药剂师的专业执业范围。
Pharmacist-Prescribed Hormonal Contraception: A Survey of Perceptions of Georgia Community Pharmacists and Non-Community Pharmacists.
Pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception (HC) is supported by a majority of pharmacists and pharmacy students; however, few studies have evaluated perceptions of non-community pharmacists, or differences in geographic areas. The primary objective of this study is to assess differences between community and non-community pharmacists in perceptions of pharmacist-prescribing HC in Georgia, a state that does not currently permit this practice. Secondary objectives include assessment of community pharmacist interest in prescribing HC, and differences in perceptions between pharmacists in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas. A survey was emailed in early 2022 to 2592 Georgia pharmacists, with Likert questions assessing interest, perceptions, comfort, and perceived barriers regarding pharmacist-prescribed HC. Chi square testing identified differences between groups. The completed survey response rate was 11.8%. Regardless of practice site, a majority agreed that pharmacists are well trained to prescribe HC (community 61.8% vs. non-community 68.1%, p = 0.25) and provision of HC services is within pharmacists' scope (community 73.6% vs. non-community 74.2%, p = 0.90). Overall, metropolitan and nonmetropolitan community pharmacist perceptions were similar; however, more metropolitan pharmacists believed pharmacists are well trained to prescribe HC (66.7% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.049) and that it is within their scope of practice (78.1% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.045). In summary, the majority of pharmacists, regardless of practice type, believe that pharmacists are prepared to prescribe HC and that it is a part of pharmacists' professional scope of practice.