甲状腺癌淋巴结转移预测模型的元分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Feng Liu, Fei Han, Lifang Lu, Yizhang Chen, Zhen Guo, Jingchun Yao
{"title":"甲状腺癌淋巴结转移预测模型的元分析。","authors":"Feng Liu, Fei Han, Lifang Lu, Yizhang Chen, Zhen Guo, Jingchun Yao","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03566-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of various machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Although prior studies have investigated the potential of ML in this context, the current evidence is not sufficiently strong. Hence, we undertook a thorough analysis to ascertain the predictive accuracy of different ML models and their practical relevance in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In our search, we thoroughly examined PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, encompassing their complete database history until December 3rd, 2022. To evaluate the potential bias in the machine learning models documented in the included studies, we employed the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 studies, involving 136,245 patients, were included. Among them, 21,231 patients showed central LNM (CLNM) and 4,637 had lateral LNM (LLNM). The meta-analysis results revealed that the c-index for predicting LNM, CLNM, and LLNM were 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.803 (95% CI: 0.773-0.834) in the training set, and 0.773 (95% CI: 0.754-0.791), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.829 (95% CI: 0.779-0.879) in the validation set, respectively. A total of 134 machine learning-based prediction models were included, covering 10 different types. Logistic Regression (LR) was the most commonly used model, accounting for 81.34% (109/134) of the included models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning methods have shown a certain level of accuracy in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients, indicating their potential as a predictive tool. Their use in the clinical management of PTC holds great promise. Among the various ML models investigated, the performance of logistic regression-based nomograms was deemed satisfactory.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of prediction models for predicting lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Feng Liu, Fei Han, Lifang Lu, Yizhang Chen, Zhen Guo, Jingchun Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12957-024-03566-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of various machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Although prior studies have investigated the potential of ML in this context, the current evidence is not sufficiently strong. Hence, we undertook a thorough analysis to ascertain the predictive accuracy of different ML models and their practical relevance in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In our search, we thoroughly examined PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, encompassing their complete database history until December 3rd, 2022. To evaluate the potential bias in the machine learning models documented in the included studies, we employed the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 studies, involving 136,245 patients, were included. Among them, 21,231 patients showed central LNM (CLNM) and 4,637 had lateral LNM (LLNM). The meta-analysis results revealed that the c-index for predicting LNM, CLNM, and LLNM were 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.803 (95% CI: 0.773-0.834) in the training set, and 0.773 (95% CI: 0.754-0.791), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.829 (95% CI: 0.779-0.879) in the validation set, respectively. A total of 134 machine learning-based prediction models were included, covering 10 different types. Logistic Regression (LR) was the most commonly used model, accounting for 81.34% (109/134) of the included models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning methods have shown a certain level of accuracy in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients, indicating their potential as a predictive tool. Their use in the clinical management of PTC holds great promise. Among the various ML models investigated, the performance of logistic regression-based nomograms was deemed satisfactory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494801/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03566-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03566-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估各种机器学习(ML)技术在预测甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者术前淋巴结转移(LNM)方面的功效。虽然之前的研究已经调查了机器学习在这方面的潜力,但目前的证据还不够充分。因此,我们进行了全面分析,以确定不同 ML 模型的预测准确性及其在预测 PTC 患者术前 LNM 方面的实际意义:在检索过程中,我们彻底检查了PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase和Web of Science,包括截至2022年12月3日的完整数据库历史。为了评估纳入研究中记录的机器学习模型的潜在偏倚,我们采用了预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST):结果:共纳入 107 项研究,涉及 136245 名患者。其中,21231 例患者为中央型 LNM(CLNM),4637 例患者为侧型 LNM(LLNM)。荟萃分析结果显示,预测 LNM、CLNM 和 LLNM 的 c 指数分别为 0.762(95% CI:0.747-0.777)、0.762(95% CI:0.747-0.777)和 0.803(95% CI:0.训练集中分别为 0.773(95% CI:0.754-0.791)、0.762(95% CI:0.747-0.777)和 0.829(95% CI:0.779-0.879),验证集中分别为 0.773(95% CI:0.754-0.791)、0.762(95% CI:0.747-0.777)和 0.829(95% CI:0.779-0.879)。共纳入了 134 个基于机器学习的预测模型,涵盖 10 种不同类型。逻辑回归(LR)是最常用的模型,占所纳入模型的 81.34%(109/134):机器学习方法在预测 PTC 患者术前 LNM 方面显示出一定的准确性,表明其作为预测工具的潜力。它们在 PTC 临床管理中的应用前景广阔。在所研究的各种机器学习模型中,基于逻辑回归的提名图的表现令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-analysis of prediction models for predicting lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer.

Background: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of various machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Although prior studies have investigated the potential of ML in this context, the current evidence is not sufficiently strong. Hence, we undertook a thorough analysis to ascertain the predictive accuracy of different ML models and their practical relevance in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients.

Materials and methods: In our search, we thoroughly examined PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, encompassing their complete database history until December 3rd, 2022. To evaluate the potential bias in the machine learning models documented in the included studies, we employed the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

Results: A total of 107 studies, involving 136,245 patients, were included. Among them, 21,231 patients showed central LNM (CLNM) and 4,637 had lateral LNM (LLNM). The meta-analysis results revealed that the c-index for predicting LNM, CLNM, and LLNM were 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.803 (95% CI: 0.773-0.834) in the training set, and 0.773 (95% CI: 0.754-0.791), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.829 (95% CI: 0.779-0.879) in the validation set, respectively. A total of 134 machine learning-based prediction models were included, covering 10 different types. Logistic Regression (LR) was the most commonly used model, accounting for 81.34% (109/134) of the included models.

Conclusions: Machine learning methods have shown a certain level of accuracy in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients, indicating their potential as a predictive tool. Their use in the clinical management of PTC holds great promise. Among the various ML models investigated, the performance of logistic regression-based nomograms was deemed satisfactory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信