全球医护人员因 COVID-19 疫苗副作用而缺勤的负担:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccines Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.3390/vaccines12101196
Marios Politis, Georgios Rachiotis, Varvara A Mouchtouri, Christos Hadjichristodoulou
{"title":"全球医护人员因 COVID-19 疫苗副作用而缺勤的负担:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Marios Politis, Georgios Rachiotis, Varvara A Mouchtouri, Christos Hadjichristodoulou","doi":"10.3390/vaccines12101196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A rise in absenteeism among healthcare workers (HCWs) was recorded during the COVID-19 pandemic, mostly attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects may have also contributed to absenteeism during this period. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence on the prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects among HCWs. <b>Methods:</b> The inclusion criteria for this review were original quantitative studies of any design, written in English, that addressed absenteeism related to the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines among HCWs. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Web of Science) were searched for eligible articles on 7 June 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis were used to synthesize the evidence. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen observational studies with 96,786 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects was 17% (95% CI: 13-20%), while 83% (95% CI: 80-87%) of the vaccination events did not lead in any absenteeism. Study design, sex, vaccination dose, region, and vaccine type were identified as significant sources of heterogeneity. <b>Conclusions:</b> A non-negligible proportion of HCWs were absent from work after reporting side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. Various demographic factors should be considered in future vaccination schedules for HCWs to potentially decrease the burden of absenteeism related to vaccine side effects. As most studies included self-reported questionnaire data, our results may be limited due to a recall bias. <b>Other:</b> The protocol of the study was preregistered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024552517).</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Global Burden of Absenteeism Related to COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marios Politis, Georgios Rachiotis, Varvara A Mouchtouri, Christos Hadjichristodoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vaccines12101196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A rise in absenteeism among healthcare workers (HCWs) was recorded during the COVID-19 pandemic, mostly attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects may have also contributed to absenteeism during this period. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence on the prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects among HCWs. <b>Methods:</b> The inclusion criteria for this review were original quantitative studies of any design, written in English, that addressed absenteeism related to the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines among HCWs. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Web of Science) were searched for eligible articles on 7 June 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis were used to synthesize the evidence. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen observational studies with 96,786 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects was 17% (95% CI: 13-20%), while 83% (95% CI: 80-87%) of the vaccination events did not lead in any absenteeism. Study design, sex, vaccination dose, region, and vaccine type were identified as significant sources of heterogeneity. <b>Conclusions:</b> A non-negligible proportion of HCWs were absent from work after reporting side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. Various demographic factors should be considered in future vaccination schedules for HCWs to potentially decrease the burden of absenteeism related to vaccine side effects. As most studies included self-reported questionnaire data, our results may be limited due to a recall bias. <b>Other:</b> The protocol of the study was preregistered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024552517).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccines\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511213/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12101196\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12101196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医护人员(HCWs)的缺勤率有所上升,主要原因是 SARS-CoV-2 感染。然而,有证据表明,与 COVID-19 疫苗相关的副作用也可能是造成这一时期缺勤的原因之一。本研究旨在综合人机工程人员中与 COVID-19 疫苗副作用相关的缺勤发生率的证据。方法:本综述的纳入标准是以英语撰写的任何设计的原始定量研究,这些研究涉及高危工作者中与 COVID-19 疫苗副作用相关的缺勤问题。2024 年 6 月 7 日,我们在四个数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Science)中搜索了符合条件的文章。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对偏倚风险进行了评估。采用叙事综合法和荟萃分析法对证据进行综合。结果:共纳入 19 项观察性研究,96,786 人参与。与 COVID-19 疫苗副作用相关的缺勤率为 17%(95% CI:13-20%),而 83%(95% CI:80-87%)的接种事件未导致任何缺勤。研究设计、性别、接种剂量、地区和疫苗类型被认为是异质性的重要来源。研究结论在报告 COVID-19 疫苗副作用后,有一定比例的医护人员缺勤。在未来的高危行业工人疫苗接种计划中应考虑各种人口统计学因素,以减少与疫苗副作用相关的缺勤负担。由于大多数研究包括自我报告的问卷数据,我们的结果可能会因回忆偏差而受到限制。其他:研究方案已在 PROSPERO 数据库(CRD42024552517)中预先注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Global Burden of Absenteeism Related to COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: A rise in absenteeism among healthcare workers (HCWs) was recorded during the COVID-19 pandemic, mostly attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects may have also contributed to absenteeism during this period. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence on the prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects among HCWs. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this review were original quantitative studies of any design, written in English, that addressed absenteeism related to the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines among HCWs. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Web of Science) were searched for eligible articles on 7 June 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis were used to synthesize the evidence. Results: Nineteen observational studies with 96,786 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of absenteeism related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects was 17% (95% CI: 13-20%), while 83% (95% CI: 80-87%) of the vaccination events did not lead in any absenteeism. Study design, sex, vaccination dose, region, and vaccine type were identified as significant sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: A non-negligible proportion of HCWs were absent from work after reporting side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. Various demographic factors should be considered in future vaccination schedules for HCWs to potentially decrease the burden of absenteeism related to vaccine side effects. As most studies included self-reported questionnaire data, our results may be limited due to a recall bias. Other: The protocol of the study was preregistered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024552517).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信