肉牛在以饲料或谷物为基础的育成日粮的补偿生长过程中的甲烷排放和瘤胃微生物组反应。

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae143
Juan M Clariget, Georgget Banchero, Verónica Ciganda, Daniel Santander, Kate Keogh, Paul E Smith, Alan K Kelly, David A Kenny
{"title":"肉牛在以饲料或谷物为基础的育成日粮的补偿生长过程中的甲烷排放和瘤胃微生物组反应。","authors":"Juan M Clariget, Georgget Banchero, Verónica Ciganda, Daniel Santander, Kate Keogh, Paul E Smith, Alan K Kelly, David A Kenny","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of the level of prior nutritional restriction during backgrounding in Angus steers on methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, and ruminal microbiome under either a forage or grain-based finishing diet. Eighty steers (body weight [BW]: 444 ± 39 kg, age: 18 ± 1 mo) were blocked and randomly assigned within the block to either an <b>optimal</b> (0.6 to 0.7 kg/d) or <b>suboptimal</b> (0.3 to 0.4 kg/d) growth rate to exploit compensatory growth (CG), during 97 d of backgrounding. Following, for 84 d, half of the steers in each group were finished on a <b>forage</b> diet while the other half were finished on a <b>grain</b>-based diet. During the backgrounding period, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions tended (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.07) to be higher; however, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity expressed by BW gain was 50% lower (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal growth steers. BW gain, dry matter intake, diet digestibility, and ammonia nitrogen in the rumen were greater (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal steers. During the finishing period, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in either forage or grain finishing diets were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05) for both backgrounding treatments. However, due to greater BW gain in suboptimal steers (1.20 vs. 0.97 kg/d), their CH<sub>4</sub> intensity-related coefficient decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) during the finishing period. Diet digestibility or any fermentation parameter was unaffected (<i>P</i> > 0.05) by previous backgrounding during the finishing period. In fact, rumen microbial abundance measured during finishing was not modified (<i>P</i> > 0.05) by previous backgrounding. Steers finished under grain conditions, had lower (<i>P</i> < 0.01) daily CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and CH<sub>4</sub> intensity. Additionally, grain-fed steers increased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) BW gain, diet digestibility, propionic, lactic, and valeric acids, <i>Succinivibrionaceae</i> family and <i>Succiniclasticum</i>, <i>Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002</i>, <i>Sharpea</i>, and <i>Megasphaera</i> bacteria genera, compared to forage-fed steers. In conclusion, ruminal microbiome and fermentation, diet digestibility, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were unaffected during finishing between prior levels of backgrounding growth. However, given the higher BW gain in suboptimal steers in both finishing diets, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity was reduced in comparison to the optimal backgrounded steers. Nevertheless, lifetime emissions of the steers need to be assessed with the different dietary regimens, since suboptimal steers reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions during the backgrounding period but, additional days of finishing were required to achieve the same BW as their contemporaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methane emissions and rumen microbiome response during compensatory growth on either a forage or grain-based finishing diet in beef cattle.\",\"authors\":\"Juan M Clariget, Georgget Banchero, Verónica Ciganda, Daniel Santander, Kate Keogh, Paul E Smith, Alan K Kelly, David A Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txae143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of the level of prior nutritional restriction during backgrounding in Angus steers on methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, and ruminal microbiome under either a forage or grain-based finishing diet. Eighty steers (body weight [BW]: 444 ± 39 kg, age: 18 ± 1 mo) were blocked and randomly assigned within the block to either an <b>optimal</b> (0.6 to 0.7 kg/d) or <b>suboptimal</b> (0.3 to 0.4 kg/d) growth rate to exploit compensatory growth (CG), during 97 d of backgrounding. Following, for 84 d, half of the steers in each group were finished on a <b>forage</b> diet while the other half were finished on a <b>grain</b>-based diet. During the backgrounding period, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions tended (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.07) to be higher; however, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity expressed by BW gain was 50% lower (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal growth steers. BW gain, dry matter intake, diet digestibility, and ammonia nitrogen in the rumen were greater (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal steers. During the finishing period, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in either forage or grain finishing diets were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05) for both backgrounding treatments. However, due to greater BW gain in suboptimal steers (1.20 vs. 0.97 kg/d), their CH<sub>4</sub> intensity-related coefficient decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) during the finishing period. Diet digestibility or any fermentation parameter was unaffected (<i>P</i> > 0.05) by previous backgrounding during the finishing period. In fact, rumen microbial abundance measured during finishing was not modified (<i>P</i> > 0.05) by previous backgrounding. Steers finished under grain conditions, had lower (<i>P</i> < 0.01) daily CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and CH<sub>4</sub> intensity. Additionally, grain-fed steers increased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) BW gain, diet digestibility, propionic, lactic, and valeric acids, <i>Succinivibrionaceae</i> family and <i>Succiniclasticum</i>, <i>Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002</i>, <i>Sharpea</i>, and <i>Megasphaera</i> bacteria genera, compared to forage-fed steers. In conclusion, ruminal microbiome and fermentation, diet digestibility, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were unaffected during finishing between prior levels of backgrounding growth. However, given the higher BW gain in suboptimal steers in both finishing diets, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity was reduced in comparison to the optimal backgrounded steers. Nevertheless, lifetime emissions of the steers need to be assessed with the different dietary regimens, since suboptimal steers reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions during the backgrounding period but, additional days of finishing were required to achieve the same BW as their contemporaries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本实验的目的是评估在以饲料或谷物为基础的育成日粮条件下,安格斯小公牛在背景饲养期间之前的营养限制水平对甲烷(CH4)排放、日粮消化率、瘤胃发酵和瘤胃微生物组的影响。在 97 天的背景饲养期间,对 80 头小母牛(体重 [BW]:444 ± 39 kg,年龄:18 ± 1 mo)进行分块饲养,并在块内随机分配最佳(0.6 至 0.7 kg/d)或次优(0.3 至 0.4 kg/d)生长速度,以利用补偿生长(CG)。之后的 84 天内,每组中一半的阉牛以饲料为食,另一半以谷物为食。在背景饲养期间,CH4 排放量有升高的趋势(P ≤ 0.07);然而,以体重增重表示的 CH4 强度却降低了 50%(P<0.05)。然而,由于次优母牛的体重增重更大(1.20 对 0.97 千克/天),它们的 CH4 强度相关系数因育成期之前的背景处理而降低(P P > 0.05)。事实上,在育肥期间测量的瘤胃微生物丰度不会因之前的背景饲养而改变(P > 0.05)。在谷物条件下饲养的阉牛的瘤胃排放物和甲烷浓度较低(P 4)。此外,与饲草喂养的陡坡牛相比,谷物喂养的陡坡牛增加了(P Succinivibrionaceae家族和Succiniclasticum、Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002、Sharpea和Megasphaera细菌属。总之,瘤胃微生物组和发酵、日粮消化率和甲烷排放量在不同背景生长水平的育成期没有受到影响。然而,由于两种育成日粮中次优小公牛的体重增加较高,因此与最优背景小公牛相比,CH4强度有所降低。然而,由于次优母牛在背景生长期间减少了 CH4 排放量,但需要额外的育成天数才能达到与同时代母牛相同的体重,因此需要对不同日粮方案下母牛的终生排放量进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methane emissions and rumen microbiome response during compensatory growth on either a forage or grain-based finishing diet in beef cattle.

The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of the level of prior nutritional restriction during backgrounding in Angus steers on methane (CH4) emissions, diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, and ruminal microbiome under either a forage or grain-based finishing diet. Eighty steers (body weight [BW]: 444 ± 39 kg, age: 18 ± 1 mo) were blocked and randomly assigned within the block to either an optimal (0.6 to 0.7 kg/d) or suboptimal (0.3 to 0.4 kg/d) growth rate to exploit compensatory growth (CG), during 97 d of backgrounding. Following, for 84 d, half of the steers in each group were finished on a forage diet while the other half were finished on a grain-based diet. During the backgrounding period, CH4 emissions tended (P ≤ 0.07) to be higher; however, CH4 intensity expressed by BW gain was 50% lower (P < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal growth steers. BW gain, dry matter intake, diet digestibility, and ammonia nitrogen in the rumen were greater (P < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal steers. During the finishing period, CH4 emissions in either forage or grain finishing diets were similar (P > 0.05) for both backgrounding treatments. However, due to greater BW gain in suboptimal steers (1.20 vs. 0.97 kg/d), their CH4 intensity-related coefficient decreased (P < 0.05) during the finishing period. Diet digestibility or any fermentation parameter was unaffected (P > 0.05) by previous backgrounding during the finishing period. In fact, rumen microbial abundance measured during finishing was not modified (P > 0.05) by previous backgrounding. Steers finished under grain conditions, had lower (P < 0.01) daily CH4 emissions and CH4 intensity. Additionally, grain-fed steers increased (P < 0.05) BW gain, diet digestibility, propionic, lactic, and valeric acids, Succinivibrionaceae family and Succiniclasticum, Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002, Sharpea, and Megasphaera bacteria genera, compared to forage-fed steers. In conclusion, ruminal microbiome and fermentation, diet digestibility, and CH4 emissions were unaffected during finishing between prior levels of backgrounding growth. However, given the higher BW gain in suboptimal steers in both finishing diets, CH4 intensity was reduced in comparison to the optimal backgrounded steers. Nevertheless, lifetime emissions of the steers need to be assessed with the different dietary regimens, since suboptimal steers reduced CH4 emissions during the backgrounding period but, additional days of finishing were required to achieve the same BW as their contemporaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信