Juan M Clariget, Georgget Banchero, Verónica Ciganda, Daniel Santander, Kate Keogh, Paul E Smith, Alan K Kelly, David A Kenny
{"title":"肉牛在以饲料或谷物为基础的育成日粮的补偿生长过程中的甲烷排放和瘤胃微生物组反应。","authors":"Juan M Clariget, Georgget Banchero, Verónica Ciganda, Daniel Santander, Kate Keogh, Paul E Smith, Alan K Kelly, David A Kenny","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of the level of prior nutritional restriction during backgrounding in Angus steers on methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, and ruminal microbiome under either a forage or grain-based finishing diet. Eighty steers (body weight [BW]: 444 ± 39 kg, age: 18 ± 1 mo) were blocked and randomly assigned within the block to either an <b>optimal</b> (0.6 to 0.7 kg/d) or <b>suboptimal</b> (0.3 to 0.4 kg/d) growth rate to exploit compensatory growth (CG), during 97 d of backgrounding. Following, for 84 d, half of the steers in each group were finished on a <b>forage</b> diet while the other half were finished on a <b>grain</b>-based diet. During the backgrounding period, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions tended (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.07) to be higher; however, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity expressed by BW gain was 50% lower (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal growth steers. BW gain, dry matter intake, diet digestibility, and ammonia nitrogen in the rumen were greater (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal steers. During the finishing period, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in either forage or grain finishing diets were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05) for both backgrounding treatments. However, due to greater BW gain in suboptimal steers (1.20 vs. 0.97 kg/d), their CH<sub>4</sub> intensity-related coefficient decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) during the finishing period. Diet digestibility or any fermentation parameter was unaffected (<i>P</i> > 0.05) by previous backgrounding during the finishing period. In fact, rumen microbial abundance measured during finishing was not modified (<i>P</i> > 0.05) by previous backgrounding. Steers finished under grain conditions, had lower (<i>P</i> < 0.01) daily CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and CH<sub>4</sub> intensity. Additionally, grain-fed steers increased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) BW gain, diet digestibility, propionic, lactic, and valeric acids, <i>Succinivibrionaceae</i> family and <i>Succiniclasticum</i>, <i>Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002</i>, <i>Sharpea</i>, and <i>Megasphaera</i> bacteria genera, compared to forage-fed steers. In conclusion, ruminal microbiome and fermentation, diet digestibility, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were unaffected during finishing between prior levels of backgrounding growth. However, given the higher BW gain in suboptimal steers in both finishing diets, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity was reduced in comparison to the optimal backgrounded steers. Nevertheless, lifetime emissions of the steers need to be assessed with the different dietary regimens, since suboptimal steers reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions during the backgrounding period but, additional days of finishing were required to achieve the same BW as their contemporaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methane emissions and rumen microbiome response during compensatory growth on either a forage or grain-based finishing diet in beef cattle.\",\"authors\":\"Juan M Clariget, Georgget Banchero, Verónica Ciganda, Daniel Santander, Kate Keogh, Paul E Smith, Alan K Kelly, David A Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txae143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of the level of prior nutritional restriction during backgrounding in Angus steers on methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, and ruminal microbiome under either a forage or grain-based finishing diet. Eighty steers (body weight [BW]: 444 ± 39 kg, age: 18 ± 1 mo) were blocked and randomly assigned within the block to either an <b>optimal</b> (0.6 to 0.7 kg/d) or <b>suboptimal</b> (0.3 to 0.4 kg/d) growth rate to exploit compensatory growth (CG), during 97 d of backgrounding. Following, for 84 d, half of the steers in each group were finished on a <b>forage</b> diet while the other half were finished on a <b>grain</b>-based diet. During the backgrounding period, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions tended (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.07) to be higher; however, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity expressed by BW gain was 50% lower (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal growth steers. BW gain, dry matter intake, diet digestibility, and ammonia nitrogen in the rumen were greater (<i>P</i> < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal steers. During the finishing period, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in either forage or grain finishing diets were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05) for both backgrounding treatments. However, due to greater BW gain in suboptimal steers (1.20 vs. 0.97 kg/d), their CH<sub>4</sub> intensity-related coefficient decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) during the finishing period. Diet digestibility or any fermentation parameter was unaffected (<i>P</i> > 0.05) by previous backgrounding during the finishing period. In fact, rumen microbial abundance measured during finishing was not modified (<i>P</i> > 0.05) by previous backgrounding. Steers finished under grain conditions, had lower (<i>P</i> < 0.01) daily CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and CH<sub>4</sub> intensity. Additionally, grain-fed steers increased (<i>P</i> < 0.05) BW gain, diet digestibility, propionic, lactic, and valeric acids, <i>Succinivibrionaceae</i> family and <i>Succiniclasticum</i>, <i>Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002</i>, <i>Sharpea</i>, and <i>Megasphaera</i> bacteria genera, compared to forage-fed steers. In conclusion, ruminal microbiome and fermentation, diet digestibility, and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were unaffected during finishing between prior levels of backgrounding growth. However, given the higher BW gain in suboptimal steers in both finishing diets, CH<sub>4</sub> intensity was reduced in comparison to the optimal backgrounded steers. Nevertheless, lifetime emissions of the steers need to be assessed with the different dietary regimens, since suboptimal steers reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions during the backgrounding period but, additional days of finishing were required to achieve the same BW as their contemporaries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Methane emissions and rumen microbiome response during compensatory growth on either a forage or grain-based finishing diet in beef cattle.
The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of the level of prior nutritional restriction during backgrounding in Angus steers on methane (CH4) emissions, diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, and ruminal microbiome under either a forage or grain-based finishing diet. Eighty steers (body weight [BW]: 444 ± 39 kg, age: 18 ± 1 mo) were blocked and randomly assigned within the block to either an optimal (0.6 to 0.7 kg/d) or suboptimal (0.3 to 0.4 kg/d) growth rate to exploit compensatory growth (CG), during 97 d of backgrounding. Following, for 84 d, half of the steers in each group were finished on a forage diet while the other half were finished on a grain-based diet. During the backgrounding period, CH4 emissions tended (P ≤ 0.07) to be higher; however, CH4 intensity expressed by BW gain was 50% lower (P < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal growth steers. BW gain, dry matter intake, diet digestibility, and ammonia nitrogen in the rumen were greater (P < 0.01) for optimal compared to suboptimal steers. During the finishing period, CH4 emissions in either forage or grain finishing diets were similar (P > 0.05) for both backgrounding treatments. However, due to greater BW gain in suboptimal steers (1.20 vs. 0.97 kg/d), their CH4 intensity-related coefficient decreased (P < 0.05) during the finishing period. Diet digestibility or any fermentation parameter was unaffected (P > 0.05) by previous backgrounding during the finishing period. In fact, rumen microbial abundance measured during finishing was not modified (P > 0.05) by previous backgrounding. Steers finished under grain conditions, had lower (P < 0.01) daily CH4 emissions and CH4 intensity. Additionally, grain-fed steers increased (P < 0.05) BW gain, diet digestibility, propionic, lactic, and valeric acids, Succinivibrionaceae family and Succiniclasticum, Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-002, Sharpea, and Megasphaera bacteria genera, compared to forage-fed steers. In conclusion, ruminal microbiome and fermentation, diet digestibility, and CH4 emissions were unaffected during finishing between prior levels of backgrounding growth. However, given the higher BW gain in suboptimal steers in both finishing diets, CH4 intensity was reduced in comparison to the optimal backgrounded steers. Nevertheless, lifetime emissions of the steers need to be assessed with the different dietary regimens, since suboptimal steers reduced CH4 emissions during the backgrounding period but, additional days of finishing were required to achieve the same BW as their contemporaries.
期刊介绍:
Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.