非小细胞肺癌患者对微小边缘病变姑息性袖状肺叶切除术的接受度:一项回顾性研究。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.037
Jianghao Ren, Jiazheng Huang, Ziang Wang, Mingyang Zhu, Gang Wang, Ruijun Liu
{"title":"非小细胞肺癌患者对微小边缘病变姑息性袖状肺叶切除术的接受度:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Jianghao Ren, Jiazheng Huang, Ziang Wang, Mingyang Zhu, Gang Wang, Ruijun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For patients with non-small cell lung cancer, microscopic residual disease (R1) is sometimes inevitable after sleeve lobectomy. However, the necessity for extensive pneumonectomy after sleeve lobectomy with R1 status remains unclear, especially when the patient cannot tolerate surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 366 patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy for microscopic residual disease (SLobR1) or pneumonectomy between 2015 and 2019 at Shanghai Chest Hospital, China. We used propensity score matching to balance the baseline characteristics between the SLobR1 and pneumonectomy groups and then analyzed the survival outcomes (overall survival and progression-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score matching balanced the baseline characteristics, resulting in 93 patients per group. Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the SLobR1 and pneumonectomy groups. However, the subgroup analysis indicated that residual disease negatively affected early stage I disease in the SLobR1 group compared with the pneumonectomy group. In addition, the causes of death did not differ between the groups. Moreover, radiotherapy improved overall survival (P = .021) and considerably decreased the incidence of distant recurrence, similar to other studies. However, it increased the risk of extrathoracic lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative SLobR1 is acceptable, especially for patients who cannot tolerate extensive pneumonectomy. Furthermore, radiotherapy is necessary to reduce the recurrence risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of palliative sleeve lobectomy with microscopic margin disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jianghao Ren, Jiazheng Huang, Ziang Wang, Mingyang Zhu, Gang Wang, Ruijun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For patients with non-small cell lung cancer, microscopic residual disease (R1) is sometimes inevitable after sleeve lobectomy. However, the necessity for extensive pneumonectomy after sleeve lobectomy with R1 status remains unclear, especially when the patient cannot tolerate surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 366 patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy for microscopic residual disease (SLobR1) or pneumonectomy between 2015 and 2019 at Shanghai Chest Hospital, China. We used propensity score matching to balance the baseline characteristics between the SLobR1 and pneumonectomy groups and then analyzed the survival outcomes (overall survival and progression-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Propensity score matching balanced the baseline characteristics, resulting in 93 patients per group. Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the SLobR1 and pneumonectomy groups. However, the subgroup analysis indicated that residual disease negatively affected early stage I disease in the SLobR1 group compared with the pneumonectomy group. In addition, the causes of death did not differ between the groups. Moreover, radiotherapy improved overall survival (P = .021) and considerably decreased the incidence of distant recurrence, similar to other studies. However, it increased the risk of extrathoracic lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Palliative SLobR1 is acceptable, especially for patients who cannot tolerate extensive pneumonectomy. Furthermore, radiotherapy is necessary to reduce the recurrence risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.037\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.09.037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于非小细胞肺癌患者来说,袖带肺叶切除术后有时不可避免地会出现微小残留病(R1)。然而,R1 状态的袖带肺叶切除术后是否有必要进行广泛的肺切除术仍不明确,尤其是当患者不能耐受手术时:我们回顾性地收集了中国上海胸科医院在2015年至2019年期间接受袖带肺叶切除术治疗微小残留病(SLobR1)或肺切除术的366例患者的临床数据。我们采用倾向得分匹配法平衡了SLobR1组和肺切除组的基线特征,然后分析了生存结果(总生存期和无进展生存期):倾向评分匹配平衡了基线特征,每组有93名患者。SLobR1组和肺切除组的总生存期和无进展生存期没有差异。然而,亚组分析表明,与肺切除术组相比,残留疾病对SLobR1组早期I期疾病有负面影响。此外,两组患者的死亡原因并无差异。此外,放疗提高了总生存率(P = .021),并大大降低了远处复发的发生率,这与其他研究结果类似。然而,放疗增加了胸外淋巴结转移的风险:结论:姑息性SLobR1是可以接受的,尤其是对于不能耐受广泛肺切除术的患者。结论:姑息性 SLobR1 是可以接受的,尤其是对于不能耐受广泛肺切除术的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability of palliative sleeve lobectomy with microscopic margin disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

Objective: For patients with non-small cell lung cancer, microscopic residual disease (R1) is sometimes inevitable after sleeve lobectomy. However, the necessity for extensive pneumonectomy after sleeve lobectomy with R1 status remains unclear, especially when the patient cannot tolerate surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 366 patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy for microscopic residual disease (SLobR1) or pneumonectomy between 2015 and 2019 at Shanghai Chest Hospital, China. We used propensity score matching to balance the baseline characteristics between the SLobR1 and pneumonectomy groups and then analyzed the survival outcomes (overall survival and progression-free survival.

Results: Propensity score matching balanced the baseline characteristics, resulting in 93 patients per group. Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the SLobR1 and pneumonectomy groups. However, the subgroup analysis indicated that residual disease negatively affected early stage I disease in the SLobR1 group compared with the pneumonectomy group. In addition, the causes of death did not differ between the groups. Moreover, radiotherapy improved overall survival (P = .021) and considerably decreased the incidence of distant recurrence, similar to other studies. However, it increased the risk of extrathoracic lymph node metastasis.

Conclusion: Palliative SLobR1 is acceptable, especially for patients who cannot tolerate extensive pneumonectomy. Furthermore, radiotherapy is necessary to reduce the recurrence risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信