从患者的角度评估温特图尔州医院肺部科的 COVID 后多学科门诊:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Markus Wirz, Irina Nast, Anne-Kathrin Rausch, Swantje Beyer, Jürgen Hetzel, Markus Hofer
{"title":"从患者的角度评估温特图尔州医院肺部科的 COVID 后多学科门诊:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Markus Wirz, Irina Nast, Anne-Kathrin Rausch, Swantje Beyer, Jürgen Hetzel, Markus Hofer","doi":"10.57187/s.3622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>This prospective study, conducted with patients from the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Division of the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, aimed to investigate changes in patients' main symptoms, elements that aided in coping with the condition and satisfaction with the consulting and therapeutic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining ethical approval, fifty patients were consecutively included in this longitudinal study, which incorporated three survey times post-consultation: t1 (0-7 days), t2 (4-8 weeks) and t3 (4-6 months). The survey comprised standardised questionnaires, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale and the Chalder Fatigue scale, along with study-specific questions regarding symptoms and reasons for consulting the post-COVID outpatient clinic. Additionally, ten patients were invited to participate in qualitative individual interviews at t2 and t3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2023. The median age of the 50 participants was 47 years (IQR: 36-55), with 66% (33/50) being female. Most participants (66% or 33/50) reported no pre-existing conditions prior to COVID-19 infection, and only six patients required hospitalisation during the acute phase of their infection. Visits to the multidisciplinary post-COVID clinic occurred approximately eight months post-infection, with referrals primarily made by primary care physicians (82% or 41/50). The majority of patients experienced persistent tiredness, exhaustion and fatigue (94% or 47/50), along with reduced physical performance (82% or 41/50), while pain or breathing difficulties were less frequently mentioned. At t1, around half of the patients were fully or partially unable to work, a proportion that reduced to around a third by t3. Symptoms generally decreased over time, with significant improvements observed between t2 and t3. However, subjectively perceived cognitive limitations worsened or were reported more frequently over time. Most patients (96% or 48/50) felt well cared for throughout their consultations. In qualitative interviews, patients highlighted the medical staff's attentiveness and the time dedicated to consultations, which made them feel that their complaints were taken seriously and that they received appropriate information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results confirmed that the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic met most respondents' expectations. Patients found that the attentive interprofessional coaching was most helpful in coping with their illness. However, participants also noted long waiting times and expressed a desire for earlier admission to the clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"154 ","pages":"3622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the post-COVID multidisciplinary outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Division of the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur from the patient's perspective: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Wirz, Irina Nast, Anne-Kathrin Rausch, Swantje Beyer, Jürgen Hetzel, Markus Hofer\",\"doi\":\"10.57187/s.3622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>This prospective study, conducted with patients from the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Division of the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, aimed to investigate changes in patients' main symptoms, elements that aided in coping with the condition and satisfaction with the consulting and therapeutic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining ethical approval, fifty patients were consecutively included in this longitudinal study, which incorporated three survey times post-consultation: t1 (0-7 days), t2 (4-8 weeks) and t3 (4-6 months). The survey comprised standardised questionnaires, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale and the Chalder Fatigue scale, along with study-specific questions regarding symptoms and reasons for consulting the post-COVID outpatient clinic. Additionally, ten patients were invited to participate in qualitative individual interviews at t2 and t3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2023. The median age of the 50 participants was 47 years (IQR: 36-55), with 66% (33/50) being female. Most participants (66% or 33/50) reported no pre-existing conditions prior to COVID-19 infection, and only six patients required hospitalisation during the acute phase of their infection. Visits to the multidisciplinary post-COVID clinic occurred approximately eight months post-infection, with referrals primarily made by primary care physicians (82% or 41/50). The majority of patients experienced persistent tiredness, exhaustion and fatigue (94% or 47/50), along with reduced physical performance (82% or 41/50), while pain or breathing difficulties were less frequently mentioned. At t1, around half of the patients were fully or partially unable to work, a proportion that reduced to around a third by t3. Symptoms generally decreased over time, with significant improvements observed between t2 and t3. However, subjectively perceived cognitive limitations worsened or were reported more frequently over time. Most patients (96% or 48/50) felt well cared for throughout their consultations. In qualitative interviews, patients highlighted the medical staff's attentiveness and the time dedicated to consultations, which made them feel that their complaints were taken seriously and that they received appropriate information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results confirmed that the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic met most respondents' expectations. Patients found that the attentive interprofessional coaching was most helpful in coping with their illness. However, participants also noted long waiting times and expressed a desire for earlier admission to the clinic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss medical weekly\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"3622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss medical weekly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3622\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的这项前瞻性研究的对象是温特图尔州医院肺部科COVID后多学科门诊的患者,旨在调查患者主要症状的变化、有助于应对病情的因素以及对咨询和治疗干预的满意度:在获得伦理批准后,50 名患者被连续纳入这项纵向研究,其中包括咨询后的三个调查时间:t1(0-7 天)、t2(4-8 周)和 t3(4-6 个月)。调查由标准化问卷组成,包括医院焦虑和抑郁量表、COVID-19 后功能状态量表和 Chalder 疲劳量表,以及有关症状和就诊原因的特定研究问题。此外,10 名患者还受邀参加了 t2 和 t3 的定性个人访谈:研究在 2021 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月期间进行。50 名参与者的中位年龄为 47 岁(IQR:36-55),66%(33/50)为女性。大多数参与者(66%或33/50)在感染COVID-19之前没有任何疾病,只有6名患者在感染的急性期需要住院治疗。COVID感染后多学科门诊的就诊时间约为感染后8个月,主要由初级保健医生转诊(82%或41/50)。大多数患者感到持续疲倦、精疲力竭和乏力(94% 或 47/50),同时身体机能下降(82% 或 41/50),而疼痛或呼吸困难则较少提及。在第一阶段,约有一半的患者完全或部分无法工作,到第三阶段,这一比例降至约三分之一。随着时间的推移,患者的症状普遍减轻,在第二和第三阶段有明显改善。然而,随着时间的推移,患者主观感受到的认知能力限制会恶化或更频繁地出现。大多数患者(96% 或 48/50)在整个就诊过程中都感觉受到了很好的照顾。在定性访谈中,患者强调了医务人员的细心和会诊时间,这让他们感到自己的投诉得到了认真对待,并获得了适当的信息:结果证实,COVID 后多学科门诊符合大多数受访者的期望。患者认为,细心的跨专业指导对他们应对疾病最有帮助。然而,受访者也注意到等候时间较长,并表示希望能更早进入门诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the post-COVID multidisciplinary outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Division of the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur from the patient's perspective: a mixed-methods study.

Aims of the study: This prospective study, conducted with patients from the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Division of the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, aimed to investigate changes in patients' main symptoms, elements that aided in coping with the condition and satisfaction with the consulting and therapeutic interventions.

Methods: After obtaining ethical approval, fifty patients were consecutively included in this longitudinal study, which incorporated three survey times post-consultation: t1 (0-7 days), t2 (4-8 weeks) and t3 (4-6 months). The survey comprised standardised questionnaires, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale and the Chalder Fatigue scale, along with study-specific questions regarding symptoms and reasons for consulting the post-COVID outpatient clinic. Additionally, ten patients were invited to participate in qualitative individual interviews at t2 and t3.

Results: The study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2023. The median age of the 50 participants was 47 years (IQR: 36-55), with 66% (33/50) being female. Most participants (66% or 33/50) reported no pre-existing conditions prior to COVID-19 infection, and only six patients required hospitalisation during the acute phase of their infection. Visits to the multidisciplinary post-COVID clinic occurred approximately eight months post-infection, with referrals primarily made by primary care physicians (82% or 41/50). The majority of patients experienced persistent tiredness, exhaustion and fatigue (94% or 47/50), along with reduced physical performance (82% or 41/50), while pain or breathing difficulties were less frequently mentioned. At t1, around half of the patients were fully or partially unable to work, a proportion that reduced to around a third by t3. Symptoms generally decreased over time, with significant improvements observed between t2 and t3. However, subjectively perceived cognitive limitations worsened or were reported more frequently over time. Most patients (96% or 48/50) felt well cared for throughout their consultations. In qualitative interviews, patients highlighted the medical staff's attentiveness and the time dedicated to consultations, which made them feel that their complaints were taken seriously and that they received appropriate information.

Conclusions: The results confirmed that the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic met most respondents' expectations. Patients found that the attentive interprofessional coaching was most helpful in coping with their illness. However, participants also noted long waiting times and expressed a desire for earlier admission to the clinic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信