Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Roland Duculan, Erika Chiapparelli, Ranqing Lan, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Koki Tsuchiya, Maximilian Muellner, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes
{"title":"分类 Oswestry 残疾指数:什么是最能预测腰椎手术后患者满意度的分项?","authors":"Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Roland Duculan, Erika Chiapparelli, Ranqing Lan, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Koki Tsuchiya, Maximilian Muellner, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze how different ODI subsections and their improvement affect patient satisfaction 2 years after elective lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is crucial in evaluating outcomes of spinal disorders and provides valuable insights into a patient's preoperative status. There is limited information available on the individual characteristics of its subsections and their relation to postoperative patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and 2-year postoperative ODI and patient satisfaction were assessed. The analysis included preoperative scores and improvements in each ODI subsection 2 years postoperatively. Satisfaction was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with scores ≥4 deemed satisfactory. Univariate linear regression and ROC analysis established cutoffs for subsection improvement and postoperative target values to achieve postoperative satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred sisty-five patients (60% female, 67±8 y) were included. ODI improvement was achieved in 91%, and postoperative patient satisfaction in 73%. Patients with lower postoperative subsection scores and greater differences between pre- and postoperative scores were more likely to be satisfied (all P <0.001). A postoperative subsection target score of ≤1 was associated with patient satisfaction. Change in degree of pain was the most predictive subsection for satisfaction, with an AUC of 0.84 (sensitivity 79%, specificity 86%). Walking (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 87%, specificity 65%), pain intensity (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 79%, specificity 79%), personal care (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 83%, specificity 68%), and standing (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 83%, specificity 83%) all had an AUC greater than 0.80. The postoperative subsection with the lowest predictability was sleeping (AUC 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain domains, walking, standing, and personal care were the subsections with the highest predictability for patient satisfaction. These findings on the correlation between different ODI subscales and patient satisfaction are valuable for improving preoperative education, addressing disability, and ensuring postoperative satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"E308-E313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Disaggregated Oswestry Disability Index: What is the Most Predictive Subsection for Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Surgery?\",\"authors\":\"Jan Hambrecht, Paul Köhli, Roland Duculan, Erika Chiapparelli, Ranqing Lan, Ali E Guven, Gisberto Evangelisti, Marco D Burkhard, Koki Tsuchiya, Maximilian Muellner, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A Sama, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi, Carol A Mancuso, Alexander P Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze how different ODI subsections and their improvement affect patient satisfaction 2 years after elective lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is crucial in evaluating outcomes of spinal disorders and provides valuable insights into a patient's preoperative status. There is limited information available on the individual characteristics of its subsections and their relation to postoperative patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre- and 2-year postoperative ODI and patient satisfaction were assessed. The analysis included preoperative scores and improvements in each ODI subsection 2 years postoperatively. Satisfaction was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with scores ≥4 deemed satisfactory. Univariate linear regression and ROC analysis established cutoffs for subsection improvement and postoperative target values to achieve postoperative satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred sisty-five patients (60% female, 67±8 y) were included. ODI improvement was achieved in 91%, and postoperative patient satisfaction in 73%. Patients with lower postoperative subsection scores and greater differences between pre- and postoperative scores were more likely to be satisfied (all P <0.001). A postoperative subsection target score of ≤1 was associated with patient satisfaction. Change in degree of pain was the most predictive subsection for satisfaction, with an AUC of 0.84 (sensitivity 79%, specificity 86%). Walking (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 87%, specificity 65%), pain intensity (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 79%, specificity 79%), personal care (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 83%, specificity 68%), and standing (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 83%, specificity 83%) all had an AUC greater than 0.80. The postoperative subsection with the lowest predictability was sleeping (AUC 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain domains, walking, standing, and personal care were the subsections with the highest predictability for patient satisfaction. These findings on the correlation between different ODI subscales and patient satisfaction are valuable for improving preoperative education, addressing disability, and ensuring postoperative satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E308-E313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005154\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计回顾性队列研究:分析不同的ODI分项及其改善情况如何影响退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)择期腰椎手术2年后患者的满意度:背景:Oswestry 失能指数(ODI)是评估脊柱疾病疗效的关键指标,可为了解患者术前状况提供有价值的信息。关于该指数各分项的个体特征及其与术后患者满意度的关系,目前可获得的信息非常有限:方法: 对术前和术后 2 年的 ODI 和患者满意度进行了评估。分析包括术前评分和术后 2 年 ODI 各分节的改善情况。满意度按 1 至 5 级评分,得分≥4 分视为满意。单变量线性回归和 ROC 分析确定了分节改善的临界值和术后达到满意度的目标值。91%的患者 ODI 得到改善,73%的患者术后满意。术后分节评分较低且术前术后评分差异较大的患者更有可能获得满意度(所有患者):疼痛领域、行走、站立和个人护理是预测患者满意度最高的分项。这些关于不同 ODI 分量表与患者满意度之间相关性的研究结果对于改进术前教育、解决残疾问题和确保术后满意度非常有价值。
The Disaggregated Oswestry Disability Index: What is the Most Predictive Subsection for Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Surgery?
Study design: Retrospective review of cohort studies.
Objective: To analyze how different ODI subsections and their improvement affect patient satisfaction 2 years after elective lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Background: The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is crucial in evaluating outcomes of spinal disorders and provides valuable insights into a patient's preoperative status. There is limited information available on the individual characteristics of its subsections and their relation to postoperative patient satisfaction.
Methods: Pre- and 2-year postoperative ODI and patient satisfaction were assessed. The analysis included preoperative scores and improvements in each ODI subsection 2 years postoperatively. Satisfaction was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with scores ≥4 deemed satisfactory. Univariate linear regression and ROC analysis established cutoffs for subsection improvement and postoperative target values to achieve postoperative satisfaction.
Results: Two hundred sisty-five patients (60% female, 67±8 y) were included. ODI improvement was achieved in 91%, and postoperative patient satisfaction in 73%. Patients with lower postoperative subsection scores and greater differences between pre- and postoperative scores were more likely to be satisfied (all P <0.001). A postoperative subsection target score of ≤1 was associated with patient satisfaction. Change in degree of pain was the most predictive subsection for satisfaction, with an AUC of 0.84 (sensitivity 79%, specificity 86%). Walking (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 87%, specificity 65%), pain intensity (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 79%, specificity 79%), personal care (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 83%, specificity 68%), and standing (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 83%, specificity 83%) all had an AUC greater than 0.80. The postoperative subsection with the lowest predictability was sleeping (AUC 0.69).
Conclusions: Pain domains, walking, standing, and personal care were the subsections with the highest predictability for patient satisfaction. These findings on the correlation between different ODI subscales and patient satisfaction are valuable for improving preoperative education, addressing disability, and ensuring postoperative satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.