Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Marianne Razavi, Paulo Gustavo Bergerot, Edvane Birelo Lopes De Domenico, Karen Lynn Clark, Matthew Loscalzo, Sumanta Kumar Pal, William Dale
{"title":"在巴西癌症中心验证生物心理社会压力筛查工具 \"SupportScreen\"。","authors":"Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Marianne Razavi, Paulo Gustavo Bergerot, Edvane Birelo Lopes De Domenico, Karen Lynn Clark, Matthew Loscalzo, Sumanta Kumar Pal, William Dale","doi":"10.1002/pon.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biopsychosocial distress is a common yet often underestimated complication in cancer care. We sought to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of SupportScreen distress assessment tool in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cancer cohort study was conducted at a public hospital in Brazil. The SupportScreen tool underwent transcultural translation into Portuguese. Eligible patients completed the SupportScreen, Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General version (FACT-G). Statistical analyses included confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses (CFA and EFA), comparisons with established distress tools, and assessments of associations with patients' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 302 patients were assessed (M:F 35.4%:64.6%; median age: 55). Most patients were diagnosed with breast (29.1%) and gastrointestinal cancer (20.5%), at advanced disease stage (78.8%). CFA identified optimal models for emotional and physical distress; EFA revealed two factors for the logistics of medical care: practical and medical system distress. The concurrent validity of subscales demonstrated significant correlations between distress domains. Sensitivity analyses indicated good performance of emotional and physical domains in identifying distress compared to gold standard criteria. Female patients were more likely to report high emotional distress, while younger age and late disease stage were associated with higher physical distress. Additionally, late disease stage was linked to higher practical distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emotional and physical domains demonstrated validity and reliability, aligning with validated measures. Logistics of medical care distress revealed practical and medical system dimensions, expanding understanding of patient challenges. The SupportScreen tool exhibited concurrent validity and sensitivity in identifying distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Biopsychosocial Distress Screening Tool, SupportScreen, in a Brazilian Cancer Center.\",\"authors\":\"Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Marianne Razavi, Paulo Gustavo Bergerot, Edvane Birelo Lopes De Domenico, Karen Lynn Clark, Matthew Loscalzo, Sumanta Kumar Pal, William Dale\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biopsychosocial distress is a common yet often underestimated complication in cancer care. We sought to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of SupportScreen distress assessment tool in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cancer cohort study was conducted at a public hospital in Brazil. The SupportScreen tool underwent transcultural translation into Portuguese. Eligible patients completed the SupportScreen, Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General version (FACT-G). Statistical analyses included confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses (CFA and EFA), comparisons with established distress tools, and assessments of associations with patients' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 302 patients were assessed (M:F 35.4%:64.6%; median age: 55). Most patients were diagnosed with breast (29.1%) and gastrointestinal cancer (20.5%), at advanced disease stage (78.8%). CFA identified optimal models for emotional and physical distress; EFA revealed two factors for the logistics of medical care: practical and medical system distress. The concurrent validity of subscales demonstrated significant correlations between distress domains. Sensitivity analyses indicated good performance of emotional and physical domains in identifying distress compared to gold standard criteria. Female patients were more likely to report high emotional distress, while younger age and late disease stage were associated with higher physical distress. Additionally, late disease stage was linked to higher practical distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emotional and physical domains demonstrated validity and reliability, aligning with validated measures. Logistics of medical care distress revealed practical and medical system dimensions, expanding understanding of patient challenges. The SupportScreen tool exhibited concurrent validity and sensitivity in identifying distress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of a Biopsychosocial Distress Screening Tool, SupportScreen, in a Brazilian Cancer Center.
Objective: Biopsychosocial distress is a common yet often underestimated complication in cancer care. We sought to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of SupportScreen distress assessment tool in Brazil.
Methods: A cancer cohort study was conducted at a public hospital in Brazil. The SupportScreen tool underwent transcultural translation into Portuguese. Eligible patients completed the SupportScreen, Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General version (FACT-G). Statistical analyses included confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses (CFA and EFA), comparisons with established distress tools, and assessments of associations with patients' characteristics.
Results: A total of 302 patients were assessed (M:F 35.4%:64.6%; median age: 55). Most patients were diagnosed with breast (29.1%) and gastrointestinal cancer (20.5%), at advanced disease stage (78.8%). CFA identified optimal models for emotional and physical distress; EFA revealed two factors for the logistics of medical care: practical and medical system distress. The concurrent validity of subscales demonstrated significant correlations between distress domains. Sensitivity analyses indicated good performance of emotional and physical domains in identifying distress compared to gold standard criteria. Female patients were more likely to report high emotional distress, while younger age and late disease stage were associated with higher physical distress. Additionally, late disease stage was linked to higher practical distress.
Conclusion: Emotional and physical domains demonstrated validity and reliability, aligning with validated measures. Logistics of medical care distress revealed practical and medical system dimensions, expanding understanding of patient challenges. The SupportScreen tool exhibited concurrent validity and sensitivity in identifying distress.
期刊介绍：
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
