家长在家中通过数字设备客观检测喘息:使用模式及与服用 SABA 的关系。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail Whitehouse, Antonio Pizzulli, Stephanie Dramburg, Paolo Maria Matricardi
{"title":"家长在家中通过数字设备客观检测喘息:使用模式及与服用 SABA 的关系。","authors":"Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail Whitehouse, Antonio Pizzulli, Stephanie Dramburg, Paolo Maria Matricardi","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Wheezing is an important indicator of exacerbated respiratory symptoms in early childhood and must be monitored to regulate pharmacological therapy. However, parents' subjective perception of wheezing in their children is not always precise. We investigated the objective identification of children's wheezing by parents using a digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup>, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd), its longitudinal usage patterns, and its relationship with SABA administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary nested analysis of data from the intervention arm of a multi-center randomized controlled trial completed in 2021-2022 in Berlin (Germany), London (United Kingdom), and Istanbul (Turkey). Children aged 4 to 84 months with doctor's diagnosed wheezing (GINA step 1 or 2) were included. Using an electronic diary (Wheeze-Monitor<sup>TM</sup>, TPS), parents monitored and recorded for 120 days at home the presence or absence of their child's wheezing, detected both, with WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> (\"objective\" wheezing), and subjective (\"perceived\" wheezing). Parents also recorded the child's symptoms, medication intake, and family quality of life. Questionnaires regarding symptom control, quality of life, and parental self-efficacy were answered at baseline and after 90 and 120 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one/87 families completed the intervention arm of the study. WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> was on average used 0.7 (SD 0.6) times a day, with each patient reporting a positive, negative, or \"error\" outcome on average in 57%, 39%, and 5% of measurements, respectively. The use of WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> declined slightly during the first 90 days of monitoring and steeply thereafter. Repeated usage of WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> in the same day was more frequent after a \"wheeze\" (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.37-1.65, p < 0.001) and an \"error\" (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.70-2.38, p < 0.001) result, compared to a \"no wheeze\" outcome. The average per-patient daily agreement between \"objective\" and \"perceived\" wheezing/non-wheezing was 75% at the start of the monitoring period and only weakly persisted as time passed (Spearman's rho=0.09). The frequency of short-acting beta-2-agonists (SABA) administration was lower in days with closely interspaced consecutive device uses during which the patient's status was perceived as \"never wheeze\" (32/455, 7%) than in those perceived as \"persistent wheeze\" (53/119, 44%; OR 36.6, 95% CI [14.3, 94.1]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daily use of a digital WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> at home allows parents to detect their child's unperceived wheezing and discloses to caregivers the longitudinal patterns of a child's wheezing disorder. Digital monitoring of wheezing also highlights poor adherence to guidelines in SABA administration for wheezing children, with under-treatment being much more frequent than over-treatment. This pioneering study opens new perspectives for further investigation of digital wheeze detectors in the early diagnosis and proper self-management of wheezing disorders in childhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective detection of wheeze at home by parents through a digital device: usage patterns and relationship with SABA administration.\",\"authors\":\"Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail Whitehouse, Antonio Pizzulli, Stephanie Dramburg, Paolo Maria Matricardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.27295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Wheezing is an important indicator of exacerbated respiratory symptoms in early childhood and must be monitored to regulate pharmacological therapy. However, parents' subjective perception of wheezing in their children is not always precise. We investigated the objective identification of children's wheezing by parents using a digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup>, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd), its longitudinal usage patterns, and its relationship with SABA administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary nested analysis of data from the intervention arm of a multi-center randomized controlled trial completed in 2021-2022 in Berlin (Germany), London (United Kingdom), and Istanbul (Turkey). Children aged 4 to 84 months with doctor's diagnosed wheezing (GINA step 1 or 2) were included. Using an electronic diary (Wheeze-Monitor<sup>TM</sup>, TPS), parents monitored and recorded for 120 days at home the presence or absence of their child's wheezing, detected both, with WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> (\\\"objective\\\" wheezing), and subjective (\\\"perceived\\\" wheezing). Parents also recorded the child's symptoms, medication intake, and family quality of life. Questionnaires regarding symptom control, quality of life, and parental self-efficacy were answered at baseline and after 90 and 120 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one/87 families completed the intervention arm of the study. WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> was on average used 0.7 (SD 0.6) times a day, with each patient reporting a positive, negative, or \\\"error\\\" outcome on average in 57%, 39%, and 5% of measurements, respectively. The use of WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> declined slightly during the first 90 days of monitoring and steeply thereafter. Repeated usage of WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> in the same day was more frequent after a \\\"wheeze\\\" (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.37-1.65, p < 0.001) and an \\\"error\\\" (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.70-2.38, p < 0.001) result, compared to a \\\"no wheeze\\\" outcome. The average per-patient daily agreement between \\\"objective\\\" and \\\"perceived\\\" wheezing/non-wheezing was 75% at the start of the monitoring period and only weakly persisted as time passed (Spearman's rho=0.09). The frequency of short-acting beta-2-agonists (SABA) administration was lower in days with closely interspaced consecutive device uses during which the patient's status was perceived as \\\"never wheeze\\\" (32/455, 7%) than in those perceived as \\\"persistent wheeze\\\" (53/119, 44%; OR 36.6, 95% CI [14.3, 94.1]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Daily use of a digital WheezeScan<sup>TM</sup> at home allows parents to detect their child's unperceived wheezing and discloses to caregivers the longitudinal patterns of a child's wheezing disorder. Digital monitoring of wheezing also highlights poor adherence to guidelines in SABA administration for wheezing children, with under-treatment being much more frequent than over-treatment. This pioneering study opens new perspectives for further investigation of digital wheeze detectors in the early diagnosis and proper self-management of wheezing disorders in childhood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27295\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介喘息是幼儿期呼吸道症状加重的一个重要指标,必须对其进行监测以调节药物治疗。然而,家长对儿童喘息的主观感受并不总是准确的。我们研究了家长使用数字喘息检测器(WheezeScanTM,欧姆龙医疗保健有限公司)对儿童喘息的客观识别、其纵向使用模式及其与 SABA 给药的关系:我们对 2021-2022 年在德国柏林、英国伦敦和土耳其伊斯坦布尔完成的一项多中心随机对照试验干预组的数据进行了二次嵌套分析。研究对象包括经医生诊断患有喘息(GINA 1 级或 2 级)的 4 至 84 个月儿童。家长使用电子日记(Wheeze-MonitorTM,TPS),在120天的时间里在家监测并记录孩子是否出现喘息,通过WheezeScanTM("客观 "喘息)和主观("感知 "喘息)两种方式检测。家长还记录了孩子的症状、服药情况和家庭生活质量。在基线期以及 90 天和 120 天后,对症状控制、生活质量和家长自我效能进行问卷调查:结果:81/87个家庭完成了干预研究。WheezeScanTM平均每天使用0.7次(标准差0.6次),每位患者平均分别有57%、39%和5%的测量结果为阳性、阴性或 "错误"。在监测的前 90 天,WheezeScanTM 的使用率略有下降,之后则急剧下降。在 "喘息 "之后,同一天内重复使用WheezeScanTM的频率更高(HR为1.5,95% CI为1.37-1.65,P结论):每天在家中使用数字式WheezeScanTM可以让家长检测到孩子未察觉的喘息,并向护理人员揭示孩子喘息障碍的纵向模式。对喘息的数字化监测还显示,喘息患儿对 SABA 给药指南的遵守情况不佳,治疗不足比治疗过度更为常见。这项开创性的研究为进一步研究数字喘息检测器在儿童喘息障碍的早期诊断和适当自我管理方面的应用开辟了新的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Objective detection of wheeze at home by parents through a digital device: usage patterns and relationship with SABA administration.

Introduction: Wheezing is an important indicator of exacerbated respiratory symptoms in early childhood and must be monitored to regulate pharmacological therapy. However, parents' subjective perception of wheezing in their children is not always precise. We investigated the objective identification of children's wheezing by parents using a digital wheeze detector (WheezeScanTM, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd), its longitudinal usage patterns, and its relationship with SABA administration.

Methods: We conducted a secondary nested analysis of data from the intervention arm of a multi-center randomized controlled trial completed in 2021-2022 in Berlin (Germany), London (United Kingdom), and Istanbul (Turkey). Children aged 4 to 84 months with doctor's diagnosed wheezing (GINA step 1 or 2) were included. Using an electronic diary (Wheeze-MonitorTM, TPS), parents monitored and recorded for 120 days at home the presence or absence of their child's wheezing, detected both, with WheezeScanTM ("objective" wheezing), and subjective ("perceived" wheezing). Parents also recorded the child's symptoms, medication intake, and family quality of life. Questionnaires regarding symptom control, quality of life, and parental self-efficacy were answered at baseline and after 90 and 120 days.

Results: Eighty-one/87 families completed the intervention arm of the study. WheezeScanTM was on average used 0.7 (SD 0.6) times a day, with each patient reporting a positive, negative, or "error" outcome on average in 57%, 39%, and 5% of measurements, respectively. The use of WheezeScanTM declined slightly during the first 90 days of monitoring and steeply thereafter. Repeated usage of WheezeScanTM in the same day was more frequent after a "wheeze" (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.37-1.65, p < 0.001) and an "error" (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.70-2.38, p < 0.001) result, compared to a "no wheeze" outcome. The average per-patient daily agreement between "objective" and "perceived" wheezing/non-wheezing was 75% at the start of the monitoring period and only weakly persisted as time passed (Spearman's rho=0.09). The frequency of short-acting beta-2-agonists (SABA) administration was lower in days with closely interspaced consecutive device uses during which the patient's status was perceived as "never wheeze" (32/455, 7%) than in those perceived as "persistent wheeze" (53/119, 44%; OR 36.6, 95% CI [14.3, 94.1]).

Conclusion: Daily use of a digital WheezeScanTM at home allows parents to detect their child's unperceived wheezing and discloses to caregivers the longitudinal patterns of a child's wheezing disorder. Digital monitoring of wheezing also highlights poor adherence to guidelines in SABA administration for wheezing children, with under-treatment being much more frequent than over-treatment. This pioneering study opens new perspectives for further investigation of digital wheeze detectors in the early diagnosis and proper self-management of wheezing disorders in childhood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信