当前军团菌病诊断方法在捕捉临床相关军团菌流行病学方面的充分性:范围审查。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Ryan Ha, Ashley Heilmann, Sylvain A Lother, Christine Turenne, David Alexander, Yoav Keynan, Zulma Vanessa Rueda
{"title":"当前军团菌病诊断方法在捕捉临床相关军团菌流行病学方面的充分性:范围审查。","authors":"Ryan Ha, Ashley Heilmann, Sylvain A Lother, Christine Turenne, David Alexander, Yoav Keynan, Zulma Vanessa Rueda","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13100857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Legionella</i> is an underdiagnosed and underreported etiology of pneumonia. <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> serogroup 1 (LpSG1) is thought to be the most common pathogenic subgroup. This assumption is based on the frequent use of a urinary antigen test (UAT), only capable of diagnosing LpSG1. We aimed to explore the frequency of <i>Legionella</i> infections in individuals diagnosed with pneumonia and the performance of diagnostic methods for detecting <i>Legionella</i> infections. We conducted a scoping review to answer the following questions: (1) \"Does nucleic acid testing (NAT) increase the detection of non-<i>pneumophila</i> serogroup 1 <i>Legionella</i> compared to non-NAT?\"; and (2) \"Does being immunocompromised increase the frequency of pneumonia caused by non-<i>pneumophila</i> serogroup 1 <i>Legionella</i> compared to non-immunocompromised individuals with Legionnaires' disease (LD)?\". Articles reporting various diagnostic methods (both NAT and non-NAT) for pneumonia were extracted from several databases. Of the 3449 articles obtained, 31 were included in our review. The most common species were found to be <i>L. pneumophila</i>, <i>L. longbeachae</i>, and unidentified <i>Legionella</i> species appearing in 1.4%, 0.9%, and 0.6% of pneumonia cases. Nearly 50% of cases were caused by unspecified species or serogroups not detected by the standard UAT. NAT-based techniques were more likely to detect <i>Legionella</i> than non-NAT-based techniques. The identification and detection of <i>Legionella</i> and serogroups other than serogroup 1 is hampered by a lack of application of broader pan-<i>Legionella</i> or pan-serogroup diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Adequacy of Current Legionnaires' Disease Diagnostic Practices in Capturing the Epidemiology of Clinically Relevant <i>Legionella</i>: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Ha, Ashley Heilmann, Sylvain A Lother, Christine Turenne, David Alexander, Yoav Keynan, Zulma Vanessa Rueda\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pathogens13100857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Legionella</i> is an underdiagnosed and underreported etiology of pneumonia. <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> serogroup 1 (LpSG1) is thought to be the most common pathogenic subgroup. This assumption is based on the frequent use of a urinary antigen test (UAT), only capable of diagnosing LpSG1. We aimed to explore the frequency of <i>Legionella</i> infections in individuals diagnosed with pneumonia and the performance of diagnostic methods for detecting <i>Legionella</i> infections. We conducted a scoping review to answer the following questions: (1) \\\"Does nucleic acid testing (NAT) increase the detection of non-<i>pneumophila</i> serogroup 1 <i>Legionella</i> compared to non-NAT?\\\"; and (2) \\\"Does being immunocompromised increase the frequency of pneumonia caused by non-<i>pneumophila</i> serogroup 1 <i>Legionella</i> compared to non-immunocompromised individuals with Legionnaires' disease (LD)?\\\". Articles reporting various diagnostic methods (both NAT and non-NAT) for pneumonia were extracted from several databases. Of the 3449 articles obtained, 31 were included in our review. The most common species were found to be <i>L. pneumophila</i>, <i>L. longbeachae</i>, and unidentified <i>Legionella</i> species appearing in 1.4%, 0.9%, and 0.6% of pneumonia cases. Nearly 50% of cases were caused by unspecified species or serogroups not detected by the standard UAT. NAT-based techniques were more likely to detect <i>Legionella</i> than non-NAT-based techniques. The identification and detection of <i>Legionella</i> and serogroups other than serogroup 1 is hampered by a lack of application of broader pan-<i>Legionella</i> or pan-serogroup diagnostics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathogens\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510479/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13100857\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13100857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

军团菌是一种诊断率低、报告率低的肺炎病原体。嗜肺军团菌血清群 1(LpSG1)被认为是最常见的致病亚群。这一假设的依据是尿液抗原检测(UAT)的频繁使用,而该检测只能诊断 LpSG1。我们的目的是探究肺炎患者感染军团菌的频率以及检测军团菌感染的诊断方法的性能。我们进行了范围综述以回答以下问题:(1) "与非 NAT 相比,核酸检测(NAT)是否能提高非嗜肺血清 1 型军团菌的检出率?";(2) "与患有军团菌病(LD)的非免疫力低下者相比,免疫力低下者是否会增加由非嗜肺血清 1 型军团菌引起的肺炎的发病率?"。我们从多个数据库中提取了报告各种肺炎诊断方法(包括 NAT 和非 NAT)的文章。在获得的 3449 篇文章中,有 31 篇被纳入我们的综述。我们发现最常见的菌种是嗜肺军团菌、长臂军团菌和不明军团菌,分别占肺炎病例的 1.4%、0.9% 和 0.6%。近 50% 的病例是由标准 UAT 检测不到的不明菌种或血清群引起的。与非基于 NAT 的技术相比,基于 NAT 的技术更有可能检测出军团菌。由于缺乏更广泛的泛军团菌或泛血清群诊断方法的应用,军团菌和血清群(血清群 1 除外)的鉴定和检测受到了阻碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Adequacy of Current Legionnaires' Disease Diagnostic Practices in Capturing the Epidemiology of Clinically Relevant Legionella: A Scoping Review.

Legionella is an underdiagnosed and underreported etiology of pneumonia. Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (LpSG1) is thought to be the most common pathogenic subgroup. This assumption is based on the frequent use of a urinary antigen test (UAT), only capable of diagnosing LpSG1. We aimed to explore the frequency of Legionella infections in individuals diagnosed with pneumonia and the performance of diagnostic methods for detecting Legionella infections. We conducted a scoping review to answer the following questions: (1) "Does nucleic acid testing (NAT) increase the detection of non-pneumophila serogroup 1 Legionella compared to non-NAT?"; and (2) "Does being immunocompromised increase the frequency of pneumonia caused by non-pneumophila serogroup 1 Legionella compared to non-immunocompromised individuals with Legionnaires' disease (LD)?". Articles reporting various diagnostic methods (both NAT and non-NAT) for pneumonia were extracted from several databases. Of the 3449 articles obtained, 31 were included in our review. The most common species were found to be L. pneumophila, L. longbeachae, and unidentified Legionella species appearing in 1.4%, 0.9%, and 0.6% of pneumonia cases. Nearly 50% of cases were caused by unspecified species or serogroups not detected by the standard UAT. NAT-based techniques were more likely to detect Legionella than non-NAT-based techniques. The identification and detection of Legionella and serogroups other than serogroup 1 is hampered by a lack of application of broader pan-Legionella or pan-serogroup diagnostics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信