舌下神经刺激治疗唐氏综合征小儿重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的成本效益。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1030
Frances Nowlen, Patrick Scheffler
{"title":"舌下神经刺激治疗唐氏综合征小儿重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的成本效益。","authors":"Frances Nowlen, Patrick Scheffler","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the cost-effectiveness of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) implantation at an early age in simulated pediatric cohorts with Down Syndrome (DS) and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cost-utility analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hypothetical cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model simulated 3 pediatric cohorts with DS and OSA beginning at age 4 years until 21 years. Cohorts received HGNS implants in early childhood, late childhood, or adulthood at age 4, 13 (current FDA-approved age), or 18 years, respectively. Input model parameters were obtained from the literature and our institution. Outcomes were measured with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured in dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Deterministic 1-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of parameter uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results (total costs; total QALYs) across the time horizon were determined for each cohort: early implantation ($83,300.35; 15.79), late ($48,319.09; 14.98), and adult ($38,721.07; 14.55). ICERs were $48,892.47 per QALY for early vs late implantation, $43,471.15 per QALY for early vs adult implantation, and $30,959.58 per QALY for late vs adult implantation. All ICERs were below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Varying the discount rate and utility expectedly varied the ICERs and cost-effectiveness. Threshold analysis showed early implantation to be cost-effective for a HGNS implantation cost up to $62,230 compared to late implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study suggests HGNS is a cost-effective treatment strategy for pediatric patients with DS and severe OSA. Our findings also suggest cost-effectiveness at ages younger than 13, the current age of FDA approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"661-667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Pediatric Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Down Syndrome Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Frances Nowlen, Patrick Scheffler\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the cost-effectiveness of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) implantation at an early age in simulated pediatric cohorts with Down Syndrome (DS) and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cost-utility analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hypothetical cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model simulated 3 pediatric cohorts with DS and OSA beginning at age 4 years until 21 years. Cohorts received HGNS implants in early childhood, late childhood, or adulthood at age 4, 13 (current FDA-approved age), or 18 years, respectively. Input model parameters were obtained from the literature and our institution. Outcomes were measured with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured in dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Deterministic 1-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of parameter uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results (total costs; total QALYs) across the time horizon were determined for each cohort: early implantation ($83,300.35; 15.79), late ($48,319.09; 14.98), and adult ($38,721.07; 14.55). ICERs were $48,892.47 per QALY for early vs late implantation, $43,471.15 per QALY for early vs adult implantation, and $30,959.58 per QALY for late vs adult implantation. All ICERs were below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Varying the discount rate and utility expectedly varied the ICERs and cost-effectiveness. Threshold analysis showed early implantation to be cost-effective for a HGNS implantation cost up to $62,230 compared to late implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study suggests HGNS is a cost-effective treatment strategy for pediatric patients with DS and severe OSA. Our findings also suggest cost-effectiveness at ages younger than 13, the current age of FDA approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"661-667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在患有唐氏综合征(DS)和严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的模拟儿科群体中,研究舌下神经刺激(HGNS)早期植入的成本效益:研究设计:成本效用分析:研究设计:成本效用分析:马尔可夫模型模拟了 3 个患有 DS 和 OSA 的儿科队列,这些队列从 4 岁开始一直到 21 岁。队列分别在儿童早期、儿童晚期或成年后 4 岁、13 岁(目前 FDA 批准的年龄)或 18 岁时接受 HGNS 植入。输入模型参数来自文献和本机构。结果以增量成本效益比(ICER)衡量,单位为每质量调整生命年(QALY)美元。进行了确定性单向敏感性分析,以评估参数不确定性的影响:确定了每个队列在整个时间跨度内的结果(总成本;总 QALYs):早期植入(83300.35 美元;15.79)、晚期(48319.09 美元;14.98)和成人(38721.07 美元;14.55)。早期植入与晚期植入相比,ICER 为每 QALY 48892.47 美元;早期植入与成人植入相比,ICER 为每 QALY 43471.15 美元;晚期植入与成人植入相比,ICER 为每 QALY 30959.58 美元。所有 ICER 均低于每 QALY 50,000 美元的支付意愿阈值。改变贴现率和效用预计会改变 ICER 和成本效益。阈值分析显示,与晚期植入相比,早期植入 HGNS 的成本高达 62,230 美元,具有成本效益:目前的研究表明,对于患有 DS 和严重 OSA 的儿童患者来说,HGNS 是一种具有成本效益的治疗策略。我们的研究结果还表明,13 岁以下(目前美国食品药品管理局批准的年龄)的患者也具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Effectiveness of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Pediatric Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Down Syndrome Patients.

Objective: To examine the cost-effectiveness of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) implantation at an early age in simulated pediatric cohorts with Down Syndrome (DS) and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Study design: Cost-utility analysis.

Setting: Hypothetical cohort.

Methods: A Markov model simulated 3 pediatric cohorts with DS and OSA beginning at age 4 years until 21 years. Cohorts received HGNS implants in early childhood, late childhood, or adulthood at age 4, 13 (current FDA-approved age), or 18 years, respectively. Input model parameters were obtained from the literature and our institution. Outcomes were measured with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured in dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Deterministic 1-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of parameter uncertainty.

Results: Results (total costs; total QALYs) across the time horizon were determined for each cohort: early implantation ($83,300.35; 15.79), late ($48,319.09; 14.98), and adult ($38,721.07; 14.55). ICERs were $48,892.47 per QALY for early vs late implantation, $43,471.15 per QALY for early vs adult implantation, and $30,959.58 per QALY for late vs adult implantation. All ICERs were below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Varying the discount rate and utility expectedly varied the ICERs and cost-effectiveness. Threshold analysis showed early implantation to be cost-effective for a HGNS implantation cost up to $62,230 compared to late implantation.

Conclusion: The current study suggests HGNS is a cost-effective treatment strategy for pediatric patients with DS and severe OSA. Our findings also suggest cost-effectiveness at ages younger than 13, the current age of FDA approval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信