慢性阻塞性肺病患者报告体验测量(PREM-C9)在西班牙语和加泰罗尼亚语中的翻译和验证。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
M Moharra, A Llupià, B Bayés, J Escarrabill, C Almazán
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病患者报告体验测量(PREM-C9)在西班牙语和加泰罗尼亚语中的翻译和验证。","authors":"M Moharra, A Llupià, B Bayés, J Escarrabill, C Almazán","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00393-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMS) are questionnaires developed to assess the patient experience<sup>1</sup> and incorporate a vision of patient centered care as a new element of value in the quality of healthcare. The PREM-C9 was developed and tested recently in the United Kingdom (UK) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CODP). The aim of the current study was to test the validity and reliability of the PREM-C9 in Spanish and Catalan. 239 patients with COPD completed the PREM-C9 (male 68.9%; female 30.2%). Internal consistency was high for both the Spanish [Cronbach's alpha=0.802] and Catalan [Cronbach's alpha=0.875] versions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) proved the item distribution and dimensional structure of the questionnaire except for item2 of the scale \"My everyday life with COPD\". Goodness-of-fit indices were very close to acceptable values for the CFI/TLI of 0.90. Two of the three hypotheses tested to assess known groups' validity were confirmed, with statistically significant differences found between response categories on the satisfaction (p < 0.001) and breathlessness (p = 0.023) scales. No statistically significant differences were observed between the different categories for the education variable. The finding that educational level was not associated with PREM-C9 scores was supported by the results of the multiple regression analysis, which also showed that overall lower levels of overall satisfaction with health services and a greater degree of breathlessness were associated with poorer scores on the PREM-C9. This study has provided evidence for good reliability and structural and construct validity of the Catalan and Spanish versions of the PREM-C9.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and validation of the COPD Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM-C9) in Spanish and Catalan.\",\"authors\":\"M Moharra, A Llupià, B Bayés, J Escarrabill, C Almazán\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41533-024-00393-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMS) are questionnaires developed to assess the patient experience<sup>1</sup> and incorporate a vision of patient centered care as a new element of value in the quality of healthcare. The PREM-C9 was developed and tested recently in the United Kingdom (UK) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CODP). The aim of the current study was to test the validity and reliability of the PREM-C9 in Spanish and Catalan. 239 patients with COPD completed the PREM-C9 (male 68.9%; female 30.2%). Internal consistency was high for both the Spanish [Cronbach's alpha=0.802] and Catalan [Cronbach's alpha=0.875] versions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) proved the item distribution and dimensional structure of the questionnaire except for item2 of the scale \\\"My everyday life with COPD\\\". Goodness-of-fit indices were very close to acceptable values for the CFI/TLI of 0.90. Two of the three hypotheses tested to assess known groups' validity were confirmed, with statistically significant differences found between response categories on the satisfaction (p < 0.001) and breathlessness (p = 0.023) scales. No statistically significant differences were observed between the different categories for the education variable. The finding that educational level was not associated with PREM-C9 scores was supported by the results of the multiple regression analysis, which also showed that overall lower levels of overall satisfaction with health services and a greater degree of breathlessness were associated with poorer scores on the PREM-C9. This study has provided evidence for good reliability and structural and construct validity of the Catalan and Spanish versions of the PREM-C9.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00393-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00393-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者报告体验测量法(PREMS)是为评估患者体验1 而开发的调查问卷,将以患者为中心的护理愿景作为医疗质量的新价值要素。最近,英国针对慢性阻塞性肺病(CODP)患者开发并测试了 PREM-C9。本研究旨在测试 PREM-C9 在西班牙语和加泰罗尼亚语中的有效性和可靠性。239 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者完成了 PREM-C9(男性占 68.9%;女性占 30.2%)。西班牙语版[Cronbach's alpha=0.802]和加泰罗尼亚语版[Cronbach's alpha=0.875]的内部一致性都很高。除 "我与慢性阻塞性肺病的日常生活 "量表的第 2 项外,确认性因子分析(CFA)证明了问卷的项目分布和维度结构。拟合优度指数非常接近可接受值,CFI/TLI 为 0.90。为评估已知组别的有效性而测试的三个假设中,有两个得到了证实,在满意度方面,不同回答类别之间存在显著的统计学差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translation and validation of the COPD Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM-C9) in Spanish and Catalan.

Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMS) are questionnaires developed to assess the patient experience1 and incorporate a vision of patient centered care as a new element of value in the quality of healthcare. The PREM-C9 was developed and tested recently in the United Kingdom (UK) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CODP). The aim of the current study was to test the validity and reliability of the PREM-C9 in Spanish and Catalan. 239 patients with COPD completed the PREM-C9 (male 68.9%; female 30.2%). Internal consistency was high for both the Spanish [Cronbach's alpha=0.802] and Catalan [Cronbach's alpha=0.875] versions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) proved the item distribution and dimensional structure of the questionnaire except for item2 of the scale "My everyday life with COPD". Goodness-of-fit indices were very close to acceptable values for the CFI/TLI of 0.90. Two of the three hypotheses tested to assess known groups' validity were confirmed, with statistically significant differences found between response categories on the satisfaction (p < 0.001) and breathlessness (p = 0.023) scales. No statistically significant differences were observed between the different categories for the education variable. The finding that educational level was not associated with PREM-C9 scores was supported by the results of the multiple regression analysis, which also showed that overall lower levels of overall satisfaction with health services and a greater degree of breathlessness were associated with poorer scores on the PREM-C9. This study has provided evidence for good reliability and structural and construct validity of the Catalan and Spanish versions of the PREM-C9.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信