{"title":"胫骨前肌腱转移治疗马蹄内翻足畸形:立方体与外侧楔形。","authors":"Madison Craft, Gage Calhoon, Thomas R Lewis","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibialis anterior tendon transfer in relapsing clubfoot deformity is a well-known treatment option for dynamic forefoot supination and adduction deformities. The tibialis anterior tendon can be anchored to the lateral cuneiform or the cuboid. A complication of this surgery is overcorrection to a flatfoot deformity or undercorrection that maintains the clubfoot deformity. We compared reoperation rates and clinical outcomes between these 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study performed from 2005 to 2020. The primary outcome was repeat operation. The secondary outcome included clinical appearance scores described by Garceau and Palmer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 114 clubfeet (111 patients) treated in our study. Of them, 67 (58.8%) had a transfer to the lateral cuneiform, whereas 47 (41.2%) had a transfer to the cuboid. Nine patients had reoperations which included 4 (44.4%) in the lateral cuneiform group and 5 (55.6%) in the cuboid group which was not statistically significant (P=0.485). Clinical appearance scores revealed significantly better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group (P=0.0172).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no clinically significant differences in reoperation rates between transfers to the lateral cuneiform versus the cuboid. We did find better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for Clubfoot Deformity: Cuboid Versus Lateral Cuneiform.\",\"authors\":\"Madison Craft, Gage Calhoon, Thomas R Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibialis anterior tendon transfer in relapsing clubfoot deformity is a well-known treatment option for dynamic forefoot supination and adduction deformities. The tibialis anterior tendon can be anchored to the lateral cuneiform or the cuboid. A complication of this surgery is overcorrection to a flatfoot deformity or undercorrection that maintains the clubfoot deformity. We compared reoperation rates and clinical outcomes between these 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study performed from 2005 to 2020. The primary outcome was repeat operation. The secondary outcome included clinical appearance scores described by Garceau and Palmer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 114 clubfeet (111 patients) treated in our study. Of them, 67 (58.8%) had a transfer to the lateral cuneiform, whereas 47 (41.2%) had a transfer to the cuboid. Nine patients had reoperations which included 4 (44.4%) in the lateral cuneiform group and 5 (55.6%) in the cuboid group which was not statistically significant (P=0.485). Clinical appearance scores revealed significantly better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group (P=0.0172).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no clinically significant differences in reoperation rates between transfers to the lateral cuneiform versus the cuboid. We did find better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002852\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer for Clubfoot Deformity: Cuboid Versus Lateral Cuneiform.
Background: Tibialis anterior tendon transfer in relapsing clubfoot deformity is a well-known treatment option for dynamic forefoot supination and adduction deformities. The tibialis anterior tendon can be anchored to the lateral cuneiform or the cuboid. A complication of this surgery is overcorrection to a flatfoot deformity or undercorrection that maintains the clubfoot deformity. We compared reoperation rates and clinical outcomes between these 2 groups.
Methods: This is a retrospective study performed from 2005 to 2020. The primary outcome was repeat operation. The secondary outcome included clinical appearance scores described by Garceau and Palmer.
Results: There were 114 clubfeet (111 patients) treated in our study. Of them, 67 (58.8%) had a transfer to the lateral cuneiform, whereas 47 (41.2%) had a transfer to the cuboid. Nine patients had reoperations which included 4 (44.4%) in the lateral cuneiform group and 5 (55.6%) in the cuboid group which was not statistically significant (P=0.485). Clinical appearance scores revealed significantly better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group (P=0.0172).
Conclusions: There were no clinically significant differences in reoperation rates between transfers to the lateral cuneiform versus the cuboid. We did find better clinical appearance in the lateral cuneiform group after surgery compared with the cuboid group.
Level of evidence: Level III retrospective comparative study.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.