不同临床循环方法对超弹性和热敏镍钛正畸弓丝负载变形特性的影响:对比评估

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_200_23
Priti Shukla, Sudhir Kapoor, Raj Kumar Jaiswal, Vipul Kumar Sharma, Dipti Shashtri, Jitendra Bhagchandani
{"title":"不同临床循环方法对超弹性和热敏镍钛正畸弓丝负载变形特性的影响:对比评估","authors":"Priti Shukla, Sudhir Kapoor, Raj Kumar Jaiswal, Vipul Kumar Sharma, Dipti Shashtri, Jitendra Bhagchandani","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_200_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Repeated clinical use of arch wires requires sterilization and may result in alteration of the properties of the wires as they get subjected to corrosion and cold working. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the effects of different clinical recycling methods on the load-deflection properties of super-elastic and thermal nickel-titanium orthodontic arch wires.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 50 0.014\" round nickel-titanium orthodontic wires [Group I: super-elastic nickel-titanium (n = 25) and Group II: thermal nickel-titanium wires (n = 25)] were tested for changes in their load deflection properties after three different recycling methods, that is, dry heat sterilization, autoclave, and cold sterilization. For each group, five wires as received from the manufacturer were taken as control (T0), and the rest of the 20 wires were placed intra-orally for a duration of one cycle of clinical use (T1). Five wires out of these were subjected to 3-point bending tests, and the rest of the wires were subjected to different recycling methods. Load deflection properties of recycled wires were measured with an Instron universal testing machine. The results were tabulated, and the data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey <i>post hoc</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically, no significant difference was found in the super-elastic group between samples recycled by dry heat, autoclave, and cold sterilization when compared with as-received super-elastic NiTi up to 2.5 mm of deflection. A highly significant difference was found between as-received thermal NiTi group (83.51 ± 6.49 N/mm) and samples recycled by dry heat (53.73 ± 4.72 N/mm), autoclave (45.38 ± 4.37 N/mm), and cold sterilization (48.44 ± 3.12 N/mm) at 0.5 mm of deflection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among thermal NiTi, any of the sterilization methods could opt at all deflections. For super-elastic NiTi, at higher deflections or in cases of crowding of more than 2.5 mm, cold sterilization should be the method of choice, whereas any sterilization method can be used at deflections less than 2.5 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of different clinical recycling methods on load deflection properties of super-elastic and thermal nickel-titanium orthodontic arch wires: A comparative assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Priti Shukla, Sudhir Kapoor, Raj Kumar Jaiswal, Vipul Kumar Sharma, Dipti Shashtri, Jitendra Bhagchandani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jos.jos_200_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Repeated clinical use of arch wires requires sterilization and may result in alteration of the properties of the wires as they get subjected to corrosion and cold working. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the effects of different clinical recycling methods on the load-deflection properties of super-elastic and thermal nickel-titanium orthodontic arch wires.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 50 0.014\\\" round nickel-titanium orthodontic wires [Group I: super-elastic nickel-titanium (n = 25) and Group II: thermal nickel-titanium wires (n = 25)] were tested for changes in their load deflection properties after three different recycling methods, that is, dry heat sterilization, autoclave, and cold sterilization. For each group, five wires as received from the manufacturer were taken as control (T0), and the rest of the 20 wires were placed intra-orally for a duration of one cycle of clinical use (T1). Five wires out of these were subjected to 3-point bending tests, and the rest of the wires were subjected to different recycling methods. Load deflection properties of recycled wires were measured with an Instron universal testing machine. The results were tabulated, and the data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey <i>post hoc</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically, no significant difference was found in the super-elastic group between samples recycled by dry heat, autoclave, and cold sterilization when compared with as-received super-elastic NiTi up to 2.5 mm of deflection. A highly significant difference was found between as-received thermal NiTi group (83.51 ± 6.49 N/mm) and samples recycled by dry heat (53.73 ± 4.72 N/mm), autoclave (45.38 ± 4.37 N/mm), and cold sterilization (48.44 ± 3.12 N/mm) at 0.5 mm of deflection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among thermal NiTi, any of the sterilization methods could opt at all deflections. For super-elastic NiTi, at higher deflections or in cases of crowding of more than 2.5 mm, cold sterilization should be the method of choice, whereas any sterilization method can be used at deflections less than 2.5 mm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500735/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_200_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_200_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在临床上反复使用弓丝需要进行消毒,而且由于弓丝受到腐蚀和冷加工,可能会导致弓丝的特性发生改变。因此,本研究旨在评估不同临床回收方法对超弹性和热敏镍钛正畸弓丝的载荷-挠度特性的影响:共测试了 50 根 0.014 英寸圆形镍钛正畸钢丝(I 组:超弹性镍钛(n = 25),II 组:热敏镍钛(n = 25))在三种不同的回收方法(即干热灭菌、高压灭菌和冷灭菌)后的载荷变形性能变化。每组中,5 根从制造商处收到的钢丝作为对照(T0),其余 20 根钢丝口腔内放置,临床使用一个周期(T1)。其中五根钢丝进行了三点弯曲测试,其余钢丝则采用了不同的回收方法。使用 Instron 万能试验机测量了回收钢丝的载荷变形特性。结果已列表,并通过方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验对数据进行了分析:据统计,在超弹性组中,经干热、高压灭菌和冷灭菌回收的样品与原样超弹性镍钛相比,在 2.5 毫米的挠度范围内无明显差异。在挠度为 0.5 毫米时,原样热处理镍钛组(83.51 ± 6.49 牛顿/毫米)与干热(53.73 ± 4.72 牛顿/毫米)、高压蒸汽(45.38 ± 4.37 牛顿/毫米)和冷灭菌(48.44 ± 3.12 牛顿/毫米)回收样品之间的差异非常明显:在热镍钛中,任何一种灭菌方法都可以在所有偏转情况下选择。对于超弹性镍钛,在挠度较大或挤压超过 2.5 毫米的情况下,应选择冷消毒方法,而在挠度小于 2.5 毫米的情况下,任何消毒方法都可以使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of different clinical recycling methods on load deflection properties of super-elastic and thermal nickel-titanium orthodontic arch wires: A comparative assessment.

Introduction: Repeated clinical use of arch wires requires sterilization and may result in alteration of the properties of the wires as they get subjected to corrosion and cold working. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the effects of different clinical recycling methods on the load-deflection properties of super-elastic and thermal nickel-titanium orthodontic arch wires.

Materials and methods: A total of 50 0.014" round nickel-titanium orthodontic wires [Group I: super-elastic nickel-titanium (n = 25) and Group II: thermal nickel-titanium wires (n = 25)] were tested for changes in their load deflection properties after three different recycling methods, that is, dry heat sterilization, autoclave, and cold sterilization. For each group, five wires as received from the manufacturer were taken as control (T0), and the rest of the 20 wires were placed intra-orally for a duration of one cycle of clinical use (T1). Five wires out of these were subjected to 3-point bending tests, and the rest of the wires were subjected to different recycling methods. Load deflection properties of recycled wires were measured with an Instron universal testing machine. The results were tabulated, and the data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey post hoc test.

Results: Statistically, no significant difference was found in the super-elastic group between samples recycled by dry heat, autoclave, and cold sterilization when compared with as-received super-elastic NiTi up to 2.5 mm of deflection. A highly significant difference was found between as-received thermal NiTi group (83.51 ± 6.49 N/mm) and samples recycled by dry heat (53.73 ± 4.72 N/mm), autoclave (45.38 ± 4.37 N/mm), and cold sterilization (48.44 ± 3.12 N/mm) at 0.5 mm of deflection.

Conclusion: Among thermal NiTi, any of the sterilization methods could opt at all deflections. For super-elastic NiTi, at higher deflections or in cases of crowding of more than 2.5 mm, cold sterilization should be the method of choice, whereas any sterilization method can be used at deflections less than 2.5 mm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信