不同类型的漱口水对 SARS-COV-2 大流行中推荐的弹性链力量衰减的影响。

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_18_24
Sarmad S Salih Al Qassar, Afnan Jamaluddin Ismael, Zaid Br Dewachi
{"title":"不同类型的漱口水对 SARS-COV-2 大流行中推荐的弹性链力量衰减的影响。","authors":"Sarmad S Salih Al Qassar, Afnan Jamaluddin Ismael, Zaid Br Dewachi","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_18_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the force decay of the power-chain elastics after exposure to anti-coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) antiseptic mouthwashes at different intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 300 power-chain pieces were used from American Orthodontics (AO) and Dentaurum (D) brands. Each piece composed of five loops that were selected to simulate canine retraction distally. The samples were randomly grouped according to immersion in the tested mouthwashes 0.2% povidone-iodine (PVP-I), 1% hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). The maximum tensile load failure testing (MTLT) was assessed at six time points (zero, one hour, 24 hours, 1, 2 and 4 weeks). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> tests were used to analyse the data, where <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in MTLT of power-chain elastics used at different immersion intervals were observed. MTLT, in each tested group, decreased significantly as the immersion time increased with significant differences among the tested mouthwashes at each time point. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> group displays a maximum force decay throughout the time intervals for both brands, in contrast to CPC group, which shows less degradation over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both brands are decade over time during exposure to the tested mouthwashes. CPC mouthwashes is a good option to be described for orthodontic patient during COVID-19 pandemic, whereas H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> mouthwashes should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of different types of mouthwashes on force decay of elastomeric chain recommended in SARS-COV-2 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Sarmad S Salih Al Qassar, Afnan Jamaluddin Ismael, Zaid Br Dewachi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jos.jos_18_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the force decay of the power-chain elastics after exposure to anti-coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) antiseptic mouthwashes at different intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 300 power-chain pieces were used from American Orthodontics (AO) and Dentaurum (D) brands. Each piece composed of five loops that were selected to simulate canine retraction distally. The samples were randomly grouped according to immersion in the tested mouthwashes 0.2% povidone-iodine (PVP-I), 1% hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). The maximum tensile load failure testing (MTLT) was assessed at six time points (zero, one hour, 24 hours, 1, 2 and 4 weeks). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> tests were used to analyse the data, where <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in MTLT of power-chain elastics used at different immersion intervals were observed. MTLT, in each tested group, decreased significantly as the immersion time increased with significant differences among the tested mouthwashes at each time point. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> group displays a maximum force decay throughout the time intervals for both brands, in contrast to CPC group, which shows less degradation over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both brands are decade over time during exposure to the tested mouthwashes. CPC mouthwashes is a good option to be described for orthodontic patient during COVID-19 pandemic, whereas H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> mouthwashes should be avoided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_18_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_18_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在比较动力链弹力袜在不同间隔时间接触抗冠状病毒 2019(COVID-19)消毒漱口水后的力衰减情况:方法:共使用了 300 个美国正畸公司 (AO) 和 Dentaurum (D) 品牌的动力链。每个链片由五个环组成,选择这五个环是为了模拟犬齿远端后缩。根据在 0.2% 聚维酮碘 (PVP-I)、1% 过氧化氢 (H2O2) 和 0.2% 氯己定 (CHX) 及氯化十六烷基吡啶 (CPC) 测试漱口水中的浸泡情况,将样品随机分组。在六个时间点(零点、1 小时、24 小时、1 周、2 周和 4 周)对最大拉伸载荷失效测试(MTLT)进行评估。在 P < 0.05 的情况下,采用方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 后检验来分析数据:不同浸泡间隔下使用的动力链弹力袜的 MTLT 存在显著差异。随着浸泡时间的延长,各测试组的 MTLT 均显著下降,且各时间点的测试漱口水之间存在显著差异。两个品牌的 H2O2 组在整个时间间隔内都显示出最大的力衰减,相比之下,CPC 组随着时间的推移显示出较小的衰减:结论:两种品牌的漱口水在暴露于测试的漱口水期间都会随着时间的推移而衰减。结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,两种品牌的漱口水都会随着时间的推移而衰减,CPC漱口水是正畸患者的不错选择,而 H2O2 漱口水则应避免使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of different types of mouthwashes on force decay of elastomeric chain recommended in SARS-COV-2 pandemic.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the force decay of the power-chain elastics after exposure to anti-coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) antiseptic mouthwashes at different intervals.

Methods: A total of 300 power-chain pieces were used from American Orthodontics (AO) and Dentaurum (D) brands. Each piece composed of five loops that were selected to simulate canine retraction distally. The samples were randomly grouped according to immersion in the tested mouthwashes 0.2% povidone-iodine (PVP-I), 1% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC). The maximum tensile load failure testing (MTLT) was assessed at six time points (zero, one hour, 24 hours, 1, 2 and 4 weeks). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc tests were used to analyse the data, where P < 0.05.

Results: Significant differences in MTLT of power-chain elastics used at different immersion intervals were observed. MTLT, in each tested group, decreased significantly as the immersion time increased with significant differences among the tested mouthwashes at each time point. H2O2 group displays a maximum force decay throughout the time intervals for both brands, in contrast to CPC group, which shows less degradation over time.

Conclusion: Both brands are decade over time during exposure to the tested mouthwashes. CPC mouthwashes is a good option to be described for orthodontic patient during COVID-19 pandemic, whereas H2O2 mouthwashes should be avoided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信