定制与非定制正畸矫治器的临床效果:系统综述。

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_46_24
Yassir A Yassir, Mostafa K Sofar, Grant T McIntyre, David R Bearn
{"title":"定制与非定制正畸矫治器的临床效果:系统综述。","authors":"Yassir A Yassir, Mostafa K Sofar, Grant T McIntyre, David R Bearn","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_46_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with customized compared to noncustomized fixed orthodontic appliances.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed using 13 databases until February 20, 2024. Study eligibility criteria were based on studies that compared orthodontic treatment with customized fixed appliances (labial or lingual) with noncustomized appliances. All ages and types of malocclusions were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 95 studies, of which only four fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared labial customized brackets with self-ligating brackets, while one study compared lingual customized brackets with labial conventional brackets. There were no significant differences between these systems for treatment duration, outcome, number of appointments, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, and the archwire bends requirement. On the other hand, treatment planning was longer and the finishing and detailing phase was shorter in the customized appliances. There was a greater tendency for mandibular incisor proclination and bracket repositioning in the noncustomized appliances group and a greater number of bracket failures, complaints, and requirements for archwire changes in the customized appliances. Qualitative synthesis was applied due to heterogeneity in investigating the difference between the two appliance systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current limited evidence, the clinical effectiveness of customized and noncustomized orthodontic appliances was similar for the majority of clinical outcomes. Further high-quality clinical studies are required to confirm this finding.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Proper treatment planning and clinical management are the key factors for adequate outcomes apart from the type of appliance used.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical effectiveness of customized versus noncustomized orthodontic appliances: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Yassir A Yassir, Mostafa K Sofar, Grant T McIntyre, David R Bearn\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jos.jos_46_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with customized compared to noncustomized fixed orthodontic appliances.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed using 13 databases until February 20, 2024. Study eligibility criteria were based on studies that compared orthodontic treatment with customized fixed appliances (labial or lingual) with noncustomized appliances. All ages and types of malocclusions were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 95 studies, of which only four fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared labial customized brackets with self-ligating brackets, while one study compared lingual customized brackets with labial conventional brackets. There were no significant differences between these systems for treatment duration, outcome, number of appointments, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, and the archwire bends requirement. On the other hand, treatment planning was longer and the finishing and detailing phase was shorter in the customized appliances. There was a greater tendency for mandibular incisor proclination and bracket repositioning in the noncustomized appliances group and a greater number of bracket failures, complaints, and requirements for archwire changes in the customized appliances. Qualitative synthesis was applied due to heterogeneity in investigating the difference between the two appliance systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current limited evidence, the clinical effectiveness of customized and noncustomized orthodontic appliances was similar for the majority of clinical outcomes. Further high-quality clinical studies are required to confirm this finding.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Proper treatment planning and clinical management are the key factors for adequate outcomes apart from the type of appliance used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_46_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_46_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估与非定制固定矫治器相比,定制固定矫治器的临床疗效:在 2024 年 2 月 20 日前使用 13 个数据库进行了全面检索。研究资格标准基于比较使用定制固定矫治器(唇侧或舌侧)与非定制矫治器进行正畸治疗的研究。结果:搜索发现了 95 项研究,其中只有 4 项符合纳入标准。三项研究比较了唇侧定制托槽和自锁托槽,一项研究比较了舌侧定制托槽和唇侧传统托槽。这些系统在治疗时间、疗效、预约次数、镇痛剂用量、患者满意度和弓丝弯曲要求方面没有明显差异。另一方面,定制矫治器的治疗计划时间更长,完成和细化阶段更短。在非定制矫治器组中,下颌切牙前倾和托槽重新定位的趋势更大,而在定制矫治器组中,托槽失败、投诉和弓丝更换的要求更多。由于在研究两种矫治器系统的差异时存在异质性,因此采用了定性综合方法:结论:根据目前有限的证据,定制和非定制矫治器在大多数临床结果上的临床效果相似。临床意义:正确的治疗计划和临床管理是取得适当疗效的关键因素,而非所使用的矫治器类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical effectiveness of customized versus noncustomized orthodontic appliances: A systematic review.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of treatment with customized compared to noncustomized fixed orthodontic appliances.

Method: A comprehensive search was performed using 13 databases until February 20, 2024. Study eligibility criteria were based on studies that compared orthodontic treatment with customized fixed appliances (labial or lingual) with noncustomized appliances. All ages and types of malocclusions were included.

Results: The search identified 95 studies, of which only four fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared labial customized brackets with self-ligating brackets, while one study compared lingual customized brackets with labial conventional brackets. There were no significant differences between these systems for treatment duration, outcome, number of appointments, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, and the archwire bends requirement. On the other hand, treatment planning was longer and the finishing and detailing phase was shorter in the customized appliances. There was a greater tendency for mandibular incisor proclination and bracket repositioning in the noncustomized appliances group and a greater number of bracket failures, complaints, and requirements for archwire changes in the customized appliances. Qualitative synthesis was applied due to heterogeneity in investigating the difference between the two appliance systems.

Conclusion: Based on the current limited evidence, the clinical effectiveness of customized and noncustomized orthodontic appliances was similar for the majority of clinical outcomes. Further high-quality clinical studies are required to confirm this finding.

Clinical relevance: Proper treatment planning and clinical management are the key factors for adequate outcomes apart from the type of appliance used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信