Atakan Orscelik, Cem Bilgin, Jonathan Cortese, Joshua J Cayme, Sara Zandpazandi, Yigit Can Senol, Basel Musmar, Sherief Ghozy, Esref Alperen Bayraktar, Zahra Beizavi, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes
{"title":"单平面和双平面血管造影系统用于急性缺血性脑卒中机械血栓切除术的比较分析：系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Atakan Orscelik, Cem Bilgin, Jonathan Cortese, Joshua J Cayme, Sara Zandpazandi, Yigit Can Senol, Basel Musmar, Sherief Ghozy, Esref Alperen Bayraktar, Zahra Beizavi, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice of angiography system could influence the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but its impact is not yet well understood. This study aims to compare the clinical and technical outcomes of MT performed with single plane versus biplane angiography systems.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus to include studies on patients with AIS who underwent MT with either single plane or biplane angiography up to May 4, 2024. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days after the procedure. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> test and Q statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with a total of 1562 patients were analyzed. Of these, 68.4% were treated with biplane systems and 31.6% with single plane systems. Single plane angiography was associated with a significantly higher rate of favorable outcomes (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.80; P<0.01). There were no significant differences in successful recanalization, periprocedural complications, procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, or contrast volume between the two systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While single plane angiography systems may offer slightly better outcomes in MT for AIS, both systems appear equally effective in most clinical and technical perspectives, suggesting that system selection may be more dependent on availability and procedural requirements rather than inherent superiority. Our findings may encourage clinicians to use single-plane angiography in settings where the biplane angiography suite availability is limited, but it should be noted that this observation may have been influenced by selection bias, particularly since the larger studies included in our meta-analysis did not observe this effect in adjusted analyses for potential confounder factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of single plane and biplane angiography systems for mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Atakan Orscelik, Cem Bilgin, Jonathan Cortese, Joshua J Cayme, Sara Zandpazandi, Yigit Can Senol, Basel Musmar, Sherief Ghozy, Esref Alperen Bayraktar, Zahra Beizavi, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2024-022381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice of angiography system could influence the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but its impact is not yet well understood. This study aims to compare the clinical and technical outcomes of MT performed with single plane versus biplane angiography systems.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus to include studies on patients with AIS who underwent MT with either single plane or biplane angiography up to May 4, 2024. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days after the procedure. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> test and Q statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with a total of 1562 patients were analyzed. Of these, 68.4% were treated with biplane systems and 31.6% with single plane systems. Single plane angiography was associated with a significantly higher rate of favorable outcomes (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.80; P<0.01). There were no significant differences in successful recanalization, periprocedural complications, procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, or contrast volume between the two systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While single plane angiography systems may offer slightly better outcomes in MT for AIS, both systems appear equally effective in most clinical and technical perspectives, suggesting that system selection may be more dependent on availability and procedural requirements rather than inherent superiority. Our findings may encourage clinicians to use single-plane angiography in settings where the biplane angiography suite availability is limited, but it should be noted that this observation may have been influenced by selection bias, particularly since the larger studies included in our meta-analysis did not observe this effect in adjusted analyses for potential confounder factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022381\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022381","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of single plane and biplane angiography systems for mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: The choice of angiography system could influence the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but its impact is not yet well understood. This study aims to compare the clinical and technical outcomes of MT performed with single plane versus biplane angiography systems.
Method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus to include studies on patients with AIS who underwent MT with either single plane or biplane angiography up to May 4, 2024. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days after the procedure. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test and Q statistics.
Results: Five studies with a total of 1562 patients were analyzed. Of these, 68.4% were treated with biplane systems and 31.6% with single plane systems. Single plane angiography was associated with a significantly higher rate of favorable outcomes (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.80; P<0.01). There were no significant differences in successful recanalization, periprocedural complications, procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, or contrast volume between the two systems.
Conclusion: While single plane angiography systems may offer slightly better outcomes in MT for AIS, both systems appear equally effective in most clinical and technical perspectives, suggesting that system selection may be more dependent on availability and procedural requirements rather than inherent superiority. Our findings may encourage clinicians to use single-plane angiography in settings where the biplane angiography suite availability is limited, but it should be noted that this observation may have been influenced by selection bias, particularly since the larger studies included in our meta-analysis did not observe this effect in adjusted analyses for potential confounder factors.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
