用于耳鼻喉科培训的人工颞骨解剖的表面和内容验证。

IF 0.8 4区医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY

Journal of Laryngology and Otology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1017/S0022215124001774

Shadia Hashim Kurichiyil, Joshua D Whittaker, C Lucy Dalton

{"title":"用于耳鼻喉科培训的人工颞骨解剖的表面和内容验证。","authors":"Shadia Hashim Kurichiyil, Joshua D Whittaker, C Lucy Dalton","doi":"10.1017/S0022215124001774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the face and content validity of artificial temporal bone dissection in surgical training in the UK.Methods: Expert and non-expert groups participated in artificial temporal bone dissection at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Face and content validity were assessed by a validated post-dissection questionnaire.Results: The median content validity score was 34 out of 35 (interquartile range 32.00-35.00). Mean face validity score compared to human was 45.76 out of 65 (95 per cent CI 42.57-48.94). Face validity compared to cadaveric models demonstrated equivalence (95 per cent CI 25.30-30.70, crossing equivalence value 27.00). Experts rated face validity less favourably than non-experts (p = 0.012 and 0.042, respectively). Content validity was equivalent between experts and non-experts (p = 0.052). There were no significant differences in total content (p = 0.606) and face validity (p = 0.133, p = 0.105) scores between different artificial bones.Conclusion: The high content and face validity suggests ENT training programs should consider formally incorporating artificial models into mastoid surgery training pathways.","PeriodicalId":16293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","volume":" ","pages":"451-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face and content validation of artificial temporal bone dissection for otolaryngology training.\",\"authors\":\"Shadia Hashim Kurichiyil, Joshua D Whittaker, C Lucy Dalton\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0022215124001774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the face and content validity of artificial temporal bone dissection in surgical training in the UK.Methods: Expert and non-expert groups participated in artificial temporal bone dissection at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Face and content validity were assessed by a validated post-dissection questionnaire.Results: The median content validity score was 34 out of 35 (interquartile range 32.00-35.00). Mean face validity score compared to human was 45.76 out of 65 (95 per cent CI 42.57-48.94). Face validity compared to cadaveric models demonstrated equivalence (95 per cent CI 25.30-30.70, crossing equivalence value 27.00). Experts rated face validity less favourably than non-experts (p = 0.012 and 0.042, respectively). Content validity was equivalent between experts and non-experts (p = 0.052). There were no significant differences in total content (p = 0.606) and face validity (p = 0.133, p = 0.105) scores between different artificial bones.Conclusion: The high content and face validity suggests ENT training programs should consider formally incorporating artificial models into mastoid surgery training pathways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laryngology and Otology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"451-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laryngology and Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124001774\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124001774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：评价英国人工颞骨剥离术在外科训练中的面部效度和内容效度。方法：专家组和非专家组在英国伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院进行人工颞骨剥离术。脸效度和内容效度通过解剖后问卷进行评估。结果：内容效度得分中位数为34分（四分位差32.00 ~ 35.00）。与人类相比，平均面部效度得分为45.76分（95% CI 42.57-48.94）。与尸体模型相比，面部效度证明了等效性（95%置信区间25.30-30.70，交叉等值值27.00）。专家对面孔效度的评价低于非专家（p分别= 0.012和0.042）。专家和非专家的内容效度相当（p = 0.052）。不同人工骨的总含量（p = 0.606）和面效度（p = 0.133, p = 0.105）评分差异均无统计学意义。结论：耳鼻喉科培训方案应考虑将人工模型正式纳入乳突手术培训途径。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Face and content validation of artificial temporal bone dissection for otolaryngology training.

Objective: To assess the face and content validity of artificial temporal bone dissection in surgical training in the UK.

Methods: Expert and non-expert groups participated in artificial temporal bone dissection at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Face and content validity were assessed by a validated post-dissection questionnaire.

Results: The median content validity score was 34 out of 35 (interquartile range 32.00-35.00). Mean face validity score compared to human was 45.76 out of 65 (95 per cent CI 42.57-48.94). Face validity compared to cadaveric models demonstrated equivalence (95 per cent CI 25.30-30.70, crossing equivalence value 27.00). Experts rated face validity less favourably than non-experts (p = 0.012 and 0.042, respectively). Content validity was equivalent between experts and non-experts (p = 0.052). There were no significant differences in total content (p = 0.606) and face validity (p = 0.133, p = 0.105) scores between different artificial bones.

Conclusion: The high content and face validity suggests ENT training programs should consider formally incorporating artificial models into mastoid surgery training pathways.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Laryngology and Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

11.80%

发文量

593

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (JLO) is a leading, monthly journal containing original scientific articles and clinical records in otology, rhinology, laryngology and related specialties. Founded in 1887, JLO is absorbing reading for ENT specialists and trainees. The journal has an international outlook with contributions from around the world, relevant to all specialists in this area regardless of the country in which they practise. JLO contains main articles (original, review and historical), case reports and short reports as well as radiology, pathology or oncology in focus, a selection of abstracts, book reviews, letters to the editor, general notes and calendar, operative surgery techniques, and occasional supplements. It is fully illustrated and has become a definitive reference source in this fast-moving subject area. Published monthly an annual subscription is excellent value for money. Included in the subscription is access to the JLO interactive web site with searchable abstract database of the journal archive back to 1887.