经皮肾镜碎石术后残留结石碎片对意外结石风险的影响

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0435
Denzel Zhu, Kaela Mali, Christopher Carlisi, Galen Cheng, Karen M Doersch, Scott O Quarrier, Rajat K Jain
{"title":"经皮肾镜碎石术后残留结石碎片对意外结石风险的影响","authors":"Denzel Zhu, Kaela Mali, Christopher Carlisi, Galen Cheng, Karen M Doersch, Scott O Quarrier, Rajat K Jain","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Residual stone fragments are common after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), however, there is an unclear relationship between the presence of these residual stone fragments and the risk of unplanned stone events (USE). We investigated how the size of the largest residual stone fragment (LRSF) impacts the risk of USE post-PCNL. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study of PCNL between 2018 and 2022. Preoperative computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) imaging and postoperative CTAP imaging were reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative USE, defined as stone-related emergency department visits or unplanned stone procedures. LRSF were stratified by five thresholds (no postoperative stone fragments <i>vs</i> ≥0 mm, <2 <i>vs</i> ≥2 mm, <3 <i>vs</i> ≥3 mm, <4 <i>vs</i> ≥4 mm, and <5 <i>vs</i> ≥5 mm), and Cox regression was used to compare the impact of these thresholds on the risk of USE. <b><i>Results:</i></b> After exclusions, we identified 138 patients who underwent PCNL during the study period; 42 patients had a USE. When applying a 4 mm threshold, 52% of patients with LRSF ≥4 mm experienced USE <i>vs</i> 21% with LRSF <4 mm (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.0004); similarly, with a 5 mm threshold, 62.5% with LRSF ≥5 mm had such events compared with 21% with LRSF <5 mm (log-rank <i>p</i> < 0.00001). A larger LRSF was associated with a greater risk of having a USE. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> After PCNL, larger residual stone fragments, particularly those ≥4 mm, are associated with an increased risk of USE. These results demonstrate the value of identifying residual fragments in predicting USE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"1380-1386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Residual Stone Fragments on Risk of Unplanned Stone Events Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Denzel Zhu, Kaela Mali, Christopher Carlisi, Galen Cheng, Karen M Doersch, Scott O Quarrier, Rajat K Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2024.0435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Residual stone fragments are common after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), however, there is an unclear relationship between the presence of these residual stone fragments and the risk of unplanned stone events (USE). We investigated how the size of the largest residual stone fragment (LRSF) impacts the risk of USE post-PCNL. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study of PCNL between 2018 and 2022. Preoperative computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) imaging and postoperative CTAP imaging were reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative USE, defined as stone-related emergency department visits or unplanned stone procedures. LRSF were stratified by five thresholds (no postoperative stone fragments <i>vs</i> ≥0 mm, <2 <i>vs</i> ≥2 mm, <3 <i>vs</i> ≥3 mm, <4 <i>vs</i> ≥4 mm, and <5 <i>vs</i> ≥5 mm), and Cox regression was used to compare the impact of these thresholds on the risk of USE. <b><i>Results:</i></b> After exclusions, we identified 138 patients who underwent PCNL during the study period; 42 patients had a USE. When applying a 4 mm threshold, 52% of patients with LRSF ≥4 mm experienced USE <i>vs</i> 21% with LRSF <4 mm (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.0004); similarly, with a 5 mm threshold, 62.5% with LRSF ≥5 mm had such events compared with 21% with LRSF <5 mm (log-rank <i>p</i> < 0.00001). A larger LRSF was associated with a greater risk of having a USE. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> After PCNL, larger residual stone fragments, particularly those ≥4 mm, are associated with an increased risk of USE. These results demonstrate the value of identifying residual fragments in predicting USE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1380-1386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)后残留结石碎片很常见,但这些残留结石碎片的存在与非计划性结石事件(USE)风险之间的关系尚不明确。我们研究了最大残余结石碎片(LRSF)的大小如何影响 PCNL 术后的结石事件风险。材料和方法:我们对 2018 年至 2022 年期间的 PCNL 进行了回顾性队列研究。回顾了术前腹部和盆腔计算机断层扫描(CTAP)成像和术后 CTAP 成像。主要结果是术后USE的发生率,定义为结石相关的急诊就诊或计划外结石手术。根据五个阈值(术后无结石碎片 vs ≥0毫米、vs ≥2毫米、vs ≥3毫米、vs ≥4毫米和vs ≥5毫米)对LRSF进行分层,并使用Cox回归比较这些阈值对USE风险的影响。结果:经过排除,我们确定了 138 名在研究期间接受 PCNL 的患者,其中 42 名患者发生了 USE。当采用 4 毫米阈值时,52% 的 LRSF ≥4 毫米的患者发生过 USE,而 21% 的 LRSF 患者发生过 USE(P = 0.0004);同样,当采用 5 毫米阈值时,62.5% 的 LRSF ≥5 毫米的患者发生过 USE,而 21% 的 LRSF 患者发生过 USE(P < 0.00001)。LRSF 越大,发生 USE 的风险越高。结论:PCNL 后,较大的残余结石碎片,尤其是≥4 毫米的残余结石碎片,与 USE 风险增加有关。这些结果证明了识别残余碎石在预测USE方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Residual Stone Fragments on Risk of Unplanned Stone Events Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Purpose: Residual stone fragments are common after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), however, there is an unclear relationship between the presence of these residual stone fragments and the risk of unplanned stone events (USE). We investigated how the size of the largest residual stone fragment (LRSF) impacts the risk of USE post-PCNL. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of PCNL between 2018 and 2022. Preoperative computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) imaging and postoperative CTAP imaging were reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative USE, defined as stone-related emergency department visits or unplanned stone procedures. LRSF were stratified by five thresholds (no postoperative stone fragments vs ≥0 mm, <2 vs ≥2 mm, <3 vs ≥3 mm, <4 vs ≥4 mm, and <5 vs ≥5 mm), and Cox regression was used to compare the impact of these thresholds on the risk of USE. Results: After exclusions, we identified 138 patients who underwent PCNL during the study period; 42 patients had a USE. When applying a 4 mm threshold, 52% of patients with LRSF ≥4 mm experienced USE vs 21% with LRSF <4 mm (log-rank p = 0.0004); similarly, with a 5 mm threshold, 62.5% with LRSF ≥5 mm had such events compared with 21% with LRSF <5 mm (log-rank p < 0.00001). A larger LRSF was associated with a greater risk of having a USE. Conclusion: After PCNL, larger residual stone fragments, particularly those ≥4 mm, are associated with an increased risk of USE. These results demonstrate the value of identifying residual fragments in predicting USE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信