交通是城市健康的决定因素:TikTok 上对纽约市拥堵定价计划的报道。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Corey H Basch, Helen Yousaf, Joseph Fera, Rafael Gonzalez Castillo
{"title":"交通是城市健康的决定因素:TikTok 上对纽约市拥堵定价计划的报道。","authors":"Corey H Basch, Helen Yousaf, Joseph Fera, Rafael Gonzalez Castillo","doi":"10.1007/s10900-024-01415-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social listening can provide deeper insight into public sentiment regarding policy proposals, as seen with the congestion pricing initiative in New York City (NYC). The purpose of this study was to assess the content of a sample of TikTok videos related to congestion pricing in NYC. A total of 100 unique videos were extracted from the hashtag #nyccongestionpricing on TikTok and coded for the presence of the following information based on four different areas of focus: video metrics, details about pricing plan, effects of pricing plan, and user-related issues. In total, the 100-video sample received 17,375,818 views, 1,285,610 likes, 89,883 favorites, and 100,634 comments. Only 3 of the 25 content characteristics were present in a majority (> 50) of the videos. These were mentions location (below 60th street of Manhattan) (N = 65), mentions cost (N = 61), and mentions cons of pricing (N = 56). Mentioning location had a significant effect on the views (p = 0.0163) and likes (p = 0.0225) a video received. Mentioning cost had a statistical impact on the views (p = 0.0098), likes (p = 0.0128), favorites (p = 0.0128), and comments (p = 0.0030) that the video received. Mentioning the MTA and benefits of the congestion plan significantly lowered metrics of engagement. Themes that emerged were personal, often negative and tended to focus more on cost to citizens and location, despite the evidence of negative public health impacts. This research can be used as a springboard for future research that examines social listening at the intersection of public health and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traffic as an Urban Health Determinant: Coverage of the New York City Congestion Pricing Plan on TikTok.\",\"authors\":\"Corey H Basch, Helen Yousaf, Joseph Fera, Rafael Gonzalez Castillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10900-024-01415-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social listening can provide deeper insight into public sentiment regarding policy proposals, as seen with the congestion pricing initiative in New York City (NYC). The purpose of this study was to assess the content of a sample of TikTok videos related to congestion pricing in NYC. A total of 100 unique videos were extracted from the hashtag #nyccongestionpricing on TikTok and coded for the presence of the following information based on four different areas of focus: video metrics, details about pricing plan, effects of pricing plan, and user-related issues. In total, the 100-video sample received 17,375,818 views, 1,285,610 likes, 89,883 favorites, and 100,634 comments. Only 3 of the 25 content characteristics were present in a majority (> 50) of the videos. These were mentions location (below 60th street of Manhattan) (N = 65), mentions cost (N = 61), and mentions cons of pricing (N = 56). Mentioning location had a significant effect on the views (p = 0.0163) and likes (p = 0.0225) a video received. Mentioning cost had a statistical impact on the views (p = 0.0098), likes (p = 0.0128), favorites (p = 0.0128), and comments (p = 0.0030) that the video received. Mentioning the MTA and benefits of the congestion plan significantly lowered metrics of engagement. Themes that emerged were personal, often negative and tended to focus more on cost to citizens and location, despite the evidence of negative public health impacts. This research can be used as a springboard for future research that examines social listening at the intersection of public health and policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-024-01415-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-024-01415-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如纽约市(NYC)的交通拥堵定价倡议所体现的那样,社交聆听可以更深入地洞察公众对政策建议的看法。本研究旨在评估与纽约市交通拥堵定价相关的 TikTok 视频样本的内容。我们从 TikTok 上的 #nyccongestionpricing 标签中提取了总共 100 个独特的视频,并根据以下四个不同的重点领域对视频信息进行了编码:视频指标、定价计划详情、定价计划效果以及用户相关问题。这 100 个视频样本总共获得了 17,375,818 次观看、1,285,610 次点赞、89,883 次收藏和 100,634 条评论。在 25 个内容特征中,只有 3 个特征出现在大多数(大于 50 个)视频中。它们分别是提及地点(曼哈顿第 60 街以下)(65 个)、提及成本(61 个)和提及定价的缺点(56 个)。提及地点对视频的浏览量(p = 0.0163)和点赞量(p = 0.0225)有显著影响。提及成本对视频的观看次数(p = 0.0098)、点赞次数(p = 0.0128)、收藏次数(p = 0.0128)和评论次数(p = 0.0030)有统计学影响。提到 MTA 和拥堵计划的好处会大大降低参与度指标。尽管有证据表明拥堵计划会对公众健康造成负面影响,但出现的主题都是个人的,通常都是负面的,而且往往更关注市民的成本和地点。这项研究可作为未来研究的跳板,用于研究公共卫生和政策交叉点上的社会倾听。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traffic as an Urban Health Determinant: Coverage of the New York City Congestion Pricing Plan on TikTok.

Social listening can provide deeper insight into public sentiment regarding policy proposals, as seen with the congestion pricing initiative in New York City (NYC). The purpose of this study was to assess the content of a sample of TikTok videos related to congestion pricing in NYC. A total of 100 unique videos were extracted from the hashtag #nyccongestionpricing on TikTok and coded for the presence of the following information based on four different areas of focus: video metrics, details about pricing plan, effects of pricing plan, and user-related issues. In total, the 100-video sample received 17,375,818 views, 1,285,610 likes, 89,883 favorites, and 100,634 comments. Only 3 of the 25 content characteristics were present in a majority (> 50) of the videos. These were mentions location (below 60th street of Manhattan) (N = 65), mentions cost (N = 61), and mentions cons of pricing (N = 56). Mentioning location had a significant effect on the views (p = 0.0163) and likes (p = 0.0225) a video received. Mentioning cost had a statistical impact on the views (p = 0.0098), likes (p = 0.0128), favorites (p = 0.0128), and comments (p = 0.0030) that the video received. Mentioning the MTA and benefits of the congestion plan significantly lowered metrics of engagement. Themes that emerged were personal, often negative and tended to focus more on cost to citizens and location, despite the evidence of negative public health impacts. This research can be used as a springboard for future research that examines social listening at the intersection of public health and policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信