利用 HS-SPME/GC-MS 测定头孢菌素中残留的硫酸二甲酯。

IF 1.5 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Rongchun Lu
{"title":"利用 HS-SPME/GC-MS 测定头孢菌素中残留的硫酸二甲酯。","authors":"Rongchun Lu","doi":"10.1093/chromsci/bmae054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) is widely used in manufacturing process but because of its genotoxicity nature, it should be monitored at trace levels (1 μg/mL). It is complicated and difficult to quantify DMS in cephalosporin with traditional method. Herein, a method for quantifying residual DMS in cephalosporin was developed, without complex sample preprocessing, no need for a large amount of solvent, employing headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Compared with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/divinylbenzene and polyacrylate fibers, PDMS was more suitable for absorbing DMS. The research showed that the PDMS fiber should be changed after 50 adsorption-desorption cycles. Linear regression analysis of the calibration curve demonstrated a robust linear relationship, with R2 of 0.999, across a concentration range of 0.25 to 4.0 μg/mL. The method underwent rigorous validation for specificity, linearity, precision and accuracy. This method was proven effective in measuring DMS in complex matrices. The limits of detection and quantification for this method is 0.05 and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively, which has room for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chromatographic science","volume":" ","pages":"922-928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Residual Dimethyl Sulfate in Cephalosporin Using HS-SPME/GC-MS.\",\"authors\":\"Rongchun Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/chromsci/bmae054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) is widely used in manufacturing process but because of its genotoxicity nature, it should be monitored at trace levels (1 μg/mL). It is complicated and difficult to quantify DMS in cephalosporin with traditional method. Herein, a method for quantifying residual DMS in cephalosporin was developed, without complex sample preprocessing, no need for a large amount of solvent, employing headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Compared with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/divinylbenzene and polyacrylate fibers, PDMS was more suitable for absorbing DMS. The research showed that the PDMS fiber should be changed after 50 adsorption-desorption cycles. Linear regression analysis of the calibration curve demonstrated a robust linear relationship, with R2 of 0.999, across a concentration range of 0.25 to 4.0 μg/mL. The method underwent rigorous validation for specificity, linearity, precision and accuracy. This method was proven effective in measuring DMS in complex matrices. The limits of detection and quantification for this method is 0.05 and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively, which has room for improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chromatographic science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"922-928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chromatographic science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmae054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chromatographic science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmae054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硫酸二甲酯(DMS)在生产过程中被广泛使用,但由于其具有遗传毒性,因此应在痕量水平(1 μg/mL)进行监测。用传统方法定量头孢菌素中的 DMS 既复杂又困难。本文采用顶空固相微萃取(SPME)和气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)技术,建立了一种头孢菌素中残留 DMS 的定量方法,该方法无需复杂的样品预处理,也不需要大量溶剂。与聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)/二乙烯基苯纤维和聚丙烯酸酯纤维相比,PDMS 纤维更适合吸收 DMS。研究表明,PDMS 纤维应在吸附-解吸循环 50 次后更换。校准曲线的线性回归分析表明,在 0.25 至 4.0 μg/mL 的浓度范围内,线性关系良好,R2 为 0.999。该方法在特异性、线性、精密度和准确度方面都经过了严格的验证。该方法被证明可有效测定复杂基质中的 DMS。该方法的检出限和定量限分别为 0.05 和 0.25 μg/mL,还有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Residual Dimethyl Sulfate in Cephalosporin Using HS-SPME/GC-MS.

Dimethyl sulfate (DMS) is widely used in manufacturing process but because of its genotoxicity nature, it should be monitored at trace levels (1 μg/mL). It is complicated and difficult to quantify DMS in cephalosporin with traditional method. Herein, a method for quantifying residual DMS in cephalosporin was developed, without complex sample preprocessing, no need for a large amount of solvent, employing headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Compared with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/divinylbenzene and polyacrylate fibers, PDMS was more suitable for absorbing DMS. The research showed that the PDMS fiber should be changed after 50 adsorption-desorption cycles. Linear regression analysis of the calibration curve demonstrated a robust linear relationship, with R2 of 0.999, across a concentration range of 0.25 to 4.0 μg/mL. The method underwent rigorous validation for specificity, linearity, precision and accuracy. This method was proven effective in measuring DMS in complex matrices. The limits of detection and quantification for this method is 0.05 and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively, which has room for improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatographic Science is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning all methods of chromatographic analysis. The standard manuscript is a description of recent original research that covers any or all phases of a specific separation problem, principle, or method. Manuscripts which have a high degree of novelty and fundamental significance to the field of separation science are particularly encouraged. It is expected the authors will clearly state in the Introduction how their method compares in some markedly new and improved way to previous published related methods. Analytical performance characteristics of new methods including sensitivity, tested limits of detection or quantification, accuracy, precision, and specificity should be provided. Manuscripts which describe a straightforward extension of a known analytical method or an application to a previously analyzed and/or uncomplicated sample matrix will not normally be reviewed favorably. Manuscripts in which mass spectrometry is the dominant analytical method and chromatography is of marked secondary importance may be declined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信