在经胫骨截肢者从坐到站的过程中,改变假肢排列不会影响髋关节和腰部关节的负荷。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Luis A. Nolasco , Anne K. Silverman , Deanna H. Gates
{"title":"在经胫骨截肢者从坐到站的过程中,改变假肢排列不会影响髋关节和腰部关节的负荷。","authors":"Luis A. Nolasco ,&nbsp;Anne K. Silverman ,&nbsp;Deanna H. Gates","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People with a transtibial amputation (TTA) have greater prevalence of low back and hip joint pain compared to the general population. Altered movement, loading patterns, and neuromuscular activation during daily tasks like sit-to-stand likely contribute to these high rates of pain. In addition, muscle activation, ground reaction forces, and trunk range of motion can be affected by prosthetic alignment during sit-to-stand. However, it is unclear how prosthetic alignment affects joint contact forces during this task. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prosthetic alignment on hip and low-back joint loading in people with TTA during sit-to-stand. Kinematics, ground reaction forces, and muscle activity data were collected from 10 people with TTA and 10 age- and sex- matched individuals without limb loss during five self-paced sit-to-stand trials. Participants with TTA completed the sit-to-stand task with their prescribed alignment and six altered alignment conditions (±10 mm anterior/posterior, medial/lateral, and ± 20 mm short/tall). A musculoskeletal model was used to calculate hip and L4-L5 joint loading. There were no differences in hip or L4-L5 joint loading between alignments. Participants with TTA had a greater peak hip joint contact force on the intact side hip compared to the amputated side hip across all alignments. Participants with TTA had greater L4-L5 joint contact force compared to those without amputation. While prosthetic alignment did not affect joint loading during sit-to-stand, future work on additional dynamic tasks is needed to better understand the potential role of prosthetic alignment on joint loading.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 112381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altering prosthetic alignment does not affect hip and low back joint loading during sit-to-stand in people with a transtibial amputation\",\"authors\":\"Luis A. Nolasco ,&nbsp;Anne K. Silverman ,&nbsp;Deanna H. Gates\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>People with a transtibial amputation (TTA) have greater prevalence of low back and hip joint pain compared to the general population. Altered movement, loading patterns, and neuromuscular activation during daily tasks like sit-to-stand likely contribute to these high rates of pain. In addition, muscle activation, ground reaction forces, and trunk range of motion can be affected by prosthetic alignment during sit-to-stand. However, it is unclear how prosthetic alignment affects joint contact forces during this task. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prosthetic alignment on hip and low-back joint loading in people with TTA during sit-to-stand. Kinematics, ground reaction forces, and muscle activity data were collected from 10 people with TTA and 10 age- and sex- matched individuals without limb loss during five self-paced sit-to-stand trials. Participants with TTA completed the sit-to-stand task with their prescribed alignment and six altered alignment conditions (±10 mm anterior/posterior, medial/lateral, and ± 20 mm short/tall). A musculoskeletal model was used to calculate hip and L4-L5 joint loading. There were no differences in hip or L4-L5 joint loading between alignments. Participants with TTA had a greater peak hip joint contact force on the intact side hip compared to the amputated side hip across all alignments. Participants with TTA had greater L4-L5 joint contact force compared to those without amputation. While prosthetic alignment did not affect joint loading during sit-to-stand, future work on additional dynamic tasks is needed to better understand the potential role of prosthetic alignment on joint loading.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004597\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与普通人相比,经胫骨截肢(TTA)患者的腰部和髋关节疼痛发生率更高。在坐立等日常任务中,运动、负荷模式和神经肌肉激活的改变很可能是造成这些高疼痛率的原因。此外,在坐立过程中,肌肉激活、地面反作用力和躯干活动范围都会受到假肢排列的影响。然而,目前还不清楚假肢排列如何影响这项任务中的关节接触力。本研究的目的是调查在坐立过程中,假肢排列对 TTA 患者髋关节和腰背部关节负荷的影响。研究人员收集了 10 名 TTA 患者和 10 名年龄和性别匹配的无肢体缺失者在五次自定步调的坐立试验中的运动学、地面反作用力和肌肉活动数据。TTA患者在规定的对齐方式和六种改变的对齐方式(±10毫米前/后、内/外侧和±20毫米短/高)下完成了坐立任务。肌肉骨骼模型用于计算髋关节和 L4-L5 关节的负荷。对齐方式之间的髋关节或 L4-L5 关节负荷没有差异。与截肢侧髋关节相比,患有 TTA 的参试者在所有对齐方式下,完整侧髋关节的峰值髋关节接触力更大。与未截肢者相比,TTA 患者的 L4-L5 关节接触力更大。虽然假体排列并不影响坐立时的关节负荷,但未来还需要在更多动态任务中进行研究,以更好地了解假体排列对关节负荷的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Altering prosthetic alignment does not affect hip and low back joint loading during sit-to-stand in people with a transtibial amputation
People with a transtibial amputation (TTA) have greater prevalence of low back and hip joint pain compared to the general population. Altered movement, loading patterns, and neuromuscular activation during daily tasks like sit-to-stand likely contribute to these high rates of pain. In addition, muscle activation, ground reaction forces, and trunk range of motion can be affected by prosthetic alignment during sit-to-stand. However, it is unclear how prosthetic alignment affects joint contact forces during this task. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prosthetic alignment on hip and low-back joint loading in people with TTA during sit-to-stand. Kinematics, ground reaction forces, and muscle activity data were collected from 10 people with TTA and 10 age- and sex- matched individuals without limb loss during five self-paced sit-to-stand trials. Participants with TTA completed the sit-to-stand task with their prescribed alignment and six altered alignment conditions (±10 mm anterior/posterior, medial/lateral, and ± 20 mm short/tall). A musculoskeletal model was used to calculate hip and L4-L5 joint loading. There were no differences in hip or L4-L5 joint loading between alignments. Participants with TTA had a greater peak hip joint contact force on the intact side hip compared to the amputated side hip across all alignments. Participants with TTA had greater L4-L5 joint contact force compared to those without amputation. While prosthetic alignment did not affect joint loading during sit-to-stand, future work on additional dynamic tasks is needed to better understand the potential role of prosthetic alignment on joint loading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信