一款针对学龄前儿童喘息和病史收集可靠性的智能手机应用程序。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Nicola Ullmann, Adriana Fracchiolla, Alessandra Boni, Valentina Negro, Federica Porcaro, Antonio Di Marco, Salvatore Tripodi, Renato Cutrera
{"title":"一款针对学龄前儿童喘息和病史收集可靠性的智能手机应用程序。","authors":"Nicola Ullmann, Adriana Fracchiolla, Alessandra Boni, Valentina Negro, Federica Porcaro, Antonio Di Marco, Salvatore Tripodi, Renato Cutrera","doi":"10.1186/s13052-024-01792-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of mobile applications helps improving self-management in adolescents with asthma. However, no evidence is available for children with preschool wheezing. In addition, we have no data on the reliability of medical history collected at visits. The first aim was to assess the feasibility of a smartphone app in the management of preschool wheezing; secondly we aimed to evaluate the reliability of anamnestic data collected during face-to-face medical interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children with recurrent wheezing, age between 25 and 72 months, were randomly assigned to the intervention group, provided with a smartphone app for symptoms monitoring and asthma attack treatment, or to the control group, with a written action plan. At follow-up medical history was collected and the asthma control test and a clinical questionnaire were completed. App acceptability was also explored. Respiratory symptoms, medication and utilization of healthcare resources were collected. Plus, medical information obtained from the paper questionnaires was compared with data daily recorded by the app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 85 preschool children with recurrent wheezing: 43 assigned to the intervention and 42 to the control group. The average (SD) adherence to e-Diary compilation was 60 (15)%. The acceptance and usability of the intervention was favorable as 70% and 93% of participants in the intervention arm described the app as ''simple and intuitive'' at Visit1 (after 3 months from enrollement) and Visit2 (3 months later than Visit1), respectively and 95% and 98% found it useful in symptoms management. There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical outcomes. At Visit1, the cACT median score (IQR) was 23,5 (21-25) for the control group (42 patients) and 23 (21-24) for the intervention group (43 patients). At Visit2 (41 controls and 42 in the intervention group) it was 25 (24-25) and 24 (24-25), respectively. Secondary analysis of data from the intervention group showed higher incidence of daily symptoms recorded by the app in comparison with the paper questionnaire, suggesting that collection of retrospective medical history may not be completely reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The smartphone app is usable and acceptable by families of preschool wheezers. Future controlled trial are needed to prove an impact on clinical outcomes or its efficacy in a telemedicine program. Finally a daily questionnaire could provide physicians with a more reliable clinical picture as reflected better daily asthma symptoms than the written retrospective questionnaire filled at clinical visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14511,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"50 1","pages":"220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A smartphone app for preschool wheezing and reliability of medical history collection.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Ullmann, Adriana Fracchiolla, Alessandra Boni, Valentina Negro, Federica Porcaro, Antonio Di Marco, Salvatore Tripodi, Renato Cutrera\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13052-024-01792-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of mobile applications helps improving self-management in adolescents with asthma. However, no evidence is available for children with preschool wheezing. In addition, we have no data on the reliability of medical history collected at visits. The first aim was to assess the feasibility of a smartphone app in the management of preschool wheezing; secondly we aimed to evaluate the reliability of anamnestic data collected during face-to-face medical interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children with recurrent wheezing, age between 25 and 72 months, were randomly assigned to the intervention group, provided with a smartphone app for symptoms monitoring and asthma attack treatment, or to the control group, with a written action plan. At follow-up medical history was collected and the asthma control test and a clinical questionnaire were completed. App acceptability was also explored. Respiratory symptoms, medication and utilization of healthcare resources were collected. Plus, medical information obtained from the paper questionnaires was compared with data daily recorded by the app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 85 preschool children with recurrent wheezing: 43 assigned to the intervention and 42 to the control group. The average (SD) adherence to e-Diary compilation was 60 (15)%. The acceptance and usability of the intervention was favorable as 70% and 93% of participants in the intervention arm described the app as ''simple and intuitive'' at Visit1 (after 3 months from enrollement) and Visit2 (3 months later than Visit1), respectively and 95% and 98% found it useful in symptoms management. There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical outcomes. At Visit1, the cACT median score (IQR) was 23,5 (21-25) for the control group (42 patients) and 23 (21-24) for the intervention group (43 patients). At Visit2 (41 controls and 42 in the intervention group) it was 25 (24-25) and 24 (24-25), respectively. Secondary analysis of data from the intervention group showed higher incidence of daily symptoms recorded by the app in comparison with the paper questionnaire, suggesting that collection of retrospective medical history may not be completely reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The smartphone app is usable and acceptable by families of preschool wheezers. Future controlled trial are needed to prove an impact on clinical outcomes or its efficacy in a telemedicine program. Finally a daily questionnaire could provide physicians with a more reliable clinical picture as reflected better daily asthma symptoms than the written retrospective questionnaire filled at clinical visit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515270/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-024-01792-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-024-01792-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用移动应用程序有助于改善青少年哮喘患者的自我管理。然而,对于学龄前喘息的儿童,目前还没有相关的证据。此外,我们也没有关于就诊时收集的病史可靠性的数据。我们的第一个目的是评估智能手机应用程序在学龄前喘息管理中的可行性;第二个目的是评估在面对面医疗访谈中收集的病史数据的可靠性:方法:将年龄在 25 到 72 个月之间、反复喘息的儿童随机分配到干预组和对照组,干预组使用智能手机应用程序进行症状监测和哮喘发作治疗,对照组则使用书面行动计划。随访时收集病史,完成哮喘控制测试和临床问卷调查。此外,还探讨了应用程序的可接受性。此外,还收集了呼吸道症状、用药情况和医疗资源使用情况。此外,还将从纸质问卷中获得的医疗信息与应用程序每天记录的数据进行了比较:我们招募了 85 名反复喘息的学龄前儿童:43 名分配到干预组,42 名分配到对照组。电子日记的平均(标清)坚持率为 60 (15)%。干预措施的接受度和可用性良好,干预组分别有 70% 和 93% 的参与者在第一次就诊(自注册起 3 个月后)和第二次就诊(比第一次就诊晚 3 个月)时认为该应用程序 "简单、直观",95% 和 98% 的参与者认为该应用程序有助于症状管理。两组患者的临床结果无明显差异。在第 1 次就诊时,对照组(42 名患者)的 cACT 中位数分数(IQR)为 23.5(21-25),干预组(43 名患者)的 cACT 中位数分数(IQR)为 23(21-24)。在第二次就诊时(对照组 41 人,干预组 42 人),中位数分别为 25 (24-25) 和 24 (24-25)。对干预组数据的二次分析表明,与纸质问卷相比,应用程序记录的日常症状发生率更高,这表明回顾病史的收集可能并不完全可靠:结论:学龄前喘息者家庭可以使用并接受智能手机应用程序。今后还需要进行对照试验,以证明其对临床结果的影响或在远程医疗项目中的有效性。最后,与临床就诊时填写的书面回顾性问卷相比,每日问卷可为医生提供更可靠的临床信息,更好地反映每日哮喘症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A smartphone app for preschool wheezing and reliability of medical history collection.

Background: The use of mobile applications helps improving self-management in adolescents with asthma. However, no evidence is available for children with preschool wheezing. In addition, we have no data on the reliability of medical history collected at visits. The first aim was to assess the feasibility of a smartphone app in the management of preschool wheezing; secondly we aimed to evaluate the reliability of anamnestic data collected during face-to-face medical interviews.

Methods: Children with recurrent wheezing, age between 25 and 72 months, were randomly assigned to the intervention group, provided with a smartphone app for symptoms monitoring and asthma attack treatment, or to the control group, with a written action plan. At follow-up medical history was collected and the asthma control test and a clinical questionnaire were completed. App acceptability was also explored. Respiratory symptoms, medication and utilization of healthcare resources were collected. Plus, medical information obtained from the paper questionnaires was compared with data daily recorded by the app.

Results: We enrolled 85 preschool children with recurrent wheezing: 43 assigned to the intervention and 42 to the control group. The average (SD) adherence to e-Diary compilation was 60 (15)%. The acceptance and usability of the intervention was favorable as 70% and 93% of participants in the intervention arm described the app as ''simple and intuitive'' at Visit1 (after 3 months from enrollement) and Visit2 (3 months later than Visit1), respectively and 95% and 98% found it useful in symptoms management. There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical outcomes. At Visit1, the cACT median score (IQR) was 23,5 (21-25) for the control group (42 patients) and 23 (21-24) for the intervention group (43 patients). At Visit2 (41 controls and 42 in the intervention group) it was 25 (24-25) and 24 (24-25), respectively. Secondary analysis of data from the intervention group showed higher incidence of daily symptoms recorded by the app in comparison with the paper questionnaire, suggesting that collection of retrospective medical history may not be completely reliable.

Conclusions: The smartphone app is usable and acceptable by families of preschool wheezers. Future controlled trial are needed to prove an impact on clinical outcomes or its efficacy in a telemedicine program. Finally a daily questionnaire could provide physicians with a more reliable clinical picture as reflected better daily asthma symptoms than the written retrospective questionnaire filled at clinical visit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.90%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Italian Journal of Pediatrics is an open access peer-reviewed journal that includes all aspects of pediatric medicine. The journal also covers health service and public health research that addresses primary care issues. The journal provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, which commenced in 1975 as Rivista Italiana di Pediatria, provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信