品牌与非专利阿维菌素的松弛性和体内人体表现。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Rianne A van der Heijden, Daiki Tamada, Lu Mao, James Rice, Scott B Reeder
{"title":"品牌与非专利阿维菌素的松弛性和体内人体表现。","authors":"Rianne A van der Heijden, Daiki Tamada, Lu Mao, James Rice, Scott B Reeder","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ferumoxytol is a superparamagnetic iron-oxide product that is increasingly used off-label for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). With the recent regulatory approval of generic ferumoxytol, there may be an opportunity to reduce cost, so long as generic ferumoxytol has similar imaging performance to brand name ferumoxytol. This study aims to compare the relaxation-concentration dependence and MRI performance of brand name ferumoxytol with generic ferumoxytol through phantom and in vivo experiments. The secondary purpose was to determine the optimal flip angle and optimal weight-based dosing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Phantom experiments were performed using both brand name (AMAG Pharmaceuticals) and generic (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals) ferumoxytol products. Each ferumoxytol product was diluted in saline, and separately in adult bovine whole blood, at 5 iron concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 2.1 mM. Vials were placed in an MR-compatible water bath at 37°C and imaged at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Longitudinal and transverse relaxation rate constants (R1, R2, R2*) were measured for each ferumoxytol concentration, and relaxation-concentration curves were estimated. An in vivo dose accumulation study with flip angle optimization was also implemented using a cross-over design, in healthy volunteers. Cumulative doses of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mg/kg diluted ferumoxytol were administered prior to MRA of the chest on a 3.0 T clinical MRI system. For each incremental dose, the flip angle was varied from 40° to 10° in -10° increments over 5 breath-holds followed by a repeated 40° flip angle acquisition. Regions of interest were drawn in the aortic arch, paraspinous muscles, and a noisy area outside of the patient, free from obvious artifact. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated as the quotient of the average signal in the aortic arch and the standard deviation of the noise, corrected for a Rician noise distribution. Contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated as the difference in SNR between the aorta and paraspinous muscles. Absolute SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio values were compared between products for different flip angles and doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in relaxation-concentration curves between AMAG and Sandoz products in phantom experiments. Six healthy volunteers (38.8 ± 11.5 years, 3 female, 3 male) were successfully recruited and completed both imaging visits. No clinically relevant differences in image quality were observed between ferumoxytol products. The optimal flip angle range and dose for both products was 20°-30° and 5 mg/kg, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brand name and generic ferumoxytol products can be used interchangeably for MRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relaxivity and In Vivo Human Performance of Brand Name Versus Generic Ferumoxytol.\",\"authors\":\"Rianne A van der Heijden, Daiki Tamada, Lu Mao, James Rice, Scott B Reeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ferumoxytol is a superparamagnetic iron-oxide product that is increasingly used off-label for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). With the recent regulatory approval of generic ferumoxytol, there may be an opportunity to reduce cost, so long as generic ferumoxytol has similar imaging performance to brand name ferumoxytol. This study aims to compare the relaxation-concentration dependence and MRI performance of brand name ferumoxytol with generic ferumoxytol through phantom and in vivo experiments. The secondary purpose was to determine the optimal flip angle and optimal weight-based dosing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Phantom experiments were performed using both brand name (AMAG Pharmaceuticals) and generic (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals) ferumoxytol products. Each ferumoxytol product was diluted in saline, and separately in adult bovine whole blood, at 5 iron concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 2.1 mM. Vials were placed in an MR-compatible water bath at 37°C and imaged at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Longitudinal and transverse relaxation rate constants (R1, R2, R2*) were measured for each ferumoxytol concentration, and relaxation-concentration curves were estimated. An in vivo dose accumulation study with flip angle optimization was also implemented using a cross-over design, in healthy volunteers. Cumulative doses of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mg/kg diluted ferumoxytol were administered prior to MRA of the chest on a 3.0 T clinical MRI system. For each incremental dose, the flip angle was varied from 40° to 10° in -10° increments over 5 breath-holds followed by a repeated 40° flip angle acquisition. Regions of interest were drawn in the aortic arch, paraspinous muscles, and a noisy area outside of the patient, free from obvious artifact. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated as the quotient of the average signal in the aortic arch and the standard deviation of the noise, corrected for a Rician noise distribution. Contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated as the difference in SNR between the aorta and paraspinous muscles. Absolute SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio values were compared between products for different flip angles and doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in relaxation-concentration curves between AMAG and Sandoz products in phantom experiments. Six healthy volunteers (38.8 ± 11.5 years, 3 female, 3 male) were successfully recruited and completed both imaging visits. No clinically relevant differences in image quality were observed between ferumoxytol products. The optimal flip angle range and dose for both products was 20°-30° and 5 mg/kg, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brand name and generic ferumoxytol products can be used interchangeably for MRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001130\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:铁莫司特醇是一种超顺磁性氧化铁产品,越来越多地在标签外用于造影剂增强磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振血管造影(MRA)。最近,监管部门批准了非专利铁莫昔托,只要非专利铁莫昔托的成像性能与品牌铁莫昔托相似,就有可能降低成本。本研究旨在通过模型和活体实验,比较品牌铁莫司醇与仿制铁莫司醇的弛豫-浓度依赖性和磁共振成像性能。材料和方法:使用品牌产品(AMAG 制药公司)和非专利产品(Sandoz 制药公司)进行了模型实验。每种铁莫司特醇产品都稀释在生理盐水中,并分别稀释在成年牛全血中,铁浓度从 0.3 到 2.1 mM 不等。测量了每种铁莫司特醇浓度的纵向和横向弛豫速率常数(R1、R2、R2*),并估算了弛豫-浓度曲线。此外,还采用交叉设计,在健康志愿者中进行了翻转角优化的体内剂量累积研究。在使用 3.0 T 临床磁共振成像系统进行胸部 MRA 之前,分别给予 1、3、5 和 7 mg/kg 稀释阿魏酸麝香草酚累积剂量。对于每个递增剂量,翻转角以-10°为增量从40°到10°变化,持续5次呼吸,然后重复40°翻转角采集。感兴趣区位于主动脉弓、棘旁肌肉和患者体外无明显伪影的噪声区域。信噪比(SNR)按主动脉弓平均信号与噪声标准偏差之商计算,并根据里氏噪声分布进行校正。对比噪声比按主动脉和棘旁肌肉之间的 SNR 差值计算。比较了不同翻转角度和剂量下不同产品的绝对信噪比和对比度-噪声比值:在模型实验中,AMAG 和山德士产品的弛豫-浓度曲线没有明显的统计学差异或临床相关差异。成功招募了 6 名健康志愿者(38.8 ± 11.5 岁,3 女 3 男),并完成了两次成像检查。阿魏酸麝香草酚产品之间的图像质量没有临床相关性差异。两种产品的最佳翻转角范围和剂量分别为20°-30°和5 mg/kg:结论:品牌和非专利阿魏酸产品可在 MRA 中互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relaxivity and In Vivo Human Performance of Brand Name Versus Generic Ferumoxytol.

Objectives: Ferumoxytol is a superparamagnetic iron-oxide product that is increasingly used off-label for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). With the recent regulatory approval of generic ferumoxytol, there may be an opportunity to reduce cost, so long as generic ferumoxytol has similar imaging performance to brand name ferumoxytol. This study aims to compare the relaxation-concentration dependence and MRI performance of brand name ferumoxytol with generic ferumoxytol through phantom and in vivo experiments. The secondary purpose was to determine the optimal flip angle and optimal weight-based dosing.

Materials and methods: Phantom experiments were performed using both brand name (AMAG Pharmaceuticals) and generic (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals) ferumoxytol products. Each ferumoxytol product was diluted in saline, and separately in adult bovine whole blood, at 5 iron concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 2.1 mM. Vials were placed in an MR-compatible water bath at 37°C and imaged at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Longitudinal and transverse relaxation rate constants (R1, R2, R2*) were measured for each ferumoxytol concentration, and relaxation-concentration curves were estimated. An in vivo dose accumulation study with flip angle optimization was also implemented using a cross-over design, in healthy volunteers. Cumulative doses of 1, 3, 5, and 7 mg/kg diluted ferumoxytol were administered prior to MRA of the chest on a 3.0 T clinical MRI system. For each incremental dose, the flip angle was varied from 40° to 10° in -10° increments over 5 breath-holds followed by a repeated 40° flip angle acquisition. Regions of interest were drawn in the aortic arch, paraspinous muscles, and a noisy area outside of the patient, free from obvious artifact. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated as the quotient of the average signal in the aortic arch and the standard deviation of the noise, corrected for a Rician noise distribution. Contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated as the difference in SNR between the aorta and paraspinous muscles. Absolute SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio values were compared between products for different flip angles and doses.

Results: There were no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in relaxation-concentration curves between AMAG and Sandoz products in phantom experiments. Six healthy volunteers (38.8 ± 11.5 years, 3 female, 3 male) were successfully recruited and completed both imaging visits. No clinically relevant differences in image quality were observed between ferumoxytol products. The optimal flip angle range and dose for both products was 20°-30° and 5 mg/kg, respectively.

Conclusions: Brand name and generic ferumoxytol products can be used interchangeably for MRA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信