Rami Sammour, Elena Dikopoltsev, Shlomi Sagi, Dana Vitner, Inna Bleicher
{"title":"宫颈过长患者使用双气囊装置催熟宫颈 6 小时:随机对照试验的二次分析。","authors":"Rami Sammour, Elena Dikopoltsev, Shlomi Sagi, Dana Vitner, Inna Bleicher","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h is as effective as 12 h in patients with a cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on transvaginal ultrasound before induction of labor, and to determine whether patients with a long cervix need to have the balloon placed for a longer time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial that compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between women undergoing cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h (study group) versus 12 h (control group). In this secondary analysis, we included only patients who had cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on transvaginal ultrasound on admission. Our primary outcome was a Bishop score change after removal of the device. Secondary outcomes included insertion to delivery interval, mode of delivery, and oxytocin infusion duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven women met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis: 33 in the 6-h group and 34 in the 12-h group. Maternal characteristics were similar between both groups. Bishop score difference between the preinsertion and the postremoval scores were similar in the two groups (2.67 ± 1.8 vs. 2.53 ± 1.69, P = 0.76), while insertion to delivery time was 10 h shorter in the 6-h group (20.95 vs. 31.21, P = 0.02; mean difference, -10.26 [95% CI, -19.0 to -1.51]). The other secondary outcomes remained similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In women undergoing induction of labor who have a cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on admission transvaginal ultrasound, removing a double balloon device after 6 h achieved similar Bishop score changes as removal after 12 h, but significantly reduced the time to delivery. REGISTRATION AT CLINICAL TRIALS: https://classic.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ct2/show/NCT03045939.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h in patients with a long cervix: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rami Sammour, Elena Dikopoltsev, Shlomi Sagi, Dana Vitner, Inna Bleicher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.15955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h is as effective as 12 h in patients with a cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on transvaginal ultrasound before induction of labor, and to determine whether patients with a long cervix need to have the balloon placed for a longer time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial that compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between women undergoing cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h (study group) versus 12 h (control group). In this secondary analysis, we included only patients who had cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on transvaginal ultrasound on admission. Our primary outcome was a Bishop score change after removal of the device. Secondary outcomes included insertion to delivery interval, mode of delivery, and oxytocin infusion duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven women met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis: 33 in the 6-h group and 34 in the 12-h group. Maternal characteristics were similar between both groups. Bishop score difference between the preinsertion and the postremoval scores were similar in the two groups (2.67 ± 1.8 vs. 2.53 ± 1.69, P = 0.76), while insertion to delivery time was 10 h shorter in the 6-h group (20.95 vs. 31.21, P = 0.02; mean difference, -10.26 [95% CI, -19.0 to -1.51]). The other secondary outcomes remained similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In women undergoing induction of labor who have a cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on admission transvaginal ultrasound, removing a double balloon device after 6 h achieved similar Bishop score changes as removal after 12 h, but significantly reduced the time to delivery. REGISTRATION AT CLINICAL TRIALS: https://classic.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ct2/show/NCT03045939.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15955\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h in patients with a long cervix: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Objective: To examine whether cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h is as effective as 12 h in patients with a cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on transvaginal ultrasound before induction of labor, and to determine whether patients with a long cervix need to have the balloon placed for a longer time.
Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial that compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between women undergoing cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h (study group) versus 12 h (control group). In this secondary analysis, we included only patients who had cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on transvaginal ultrasound on admission. Our primary outcome was a Bishop score change after removal of the device. Secondary outcomes included insertion to delivery interval, mode of delivery, and oxytocin infusion duration.
Results: Sixty-seven women met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis: 33 in the 6-h group and 34 in the 12-h group. Maternal characteristics were similar between both groups. Bishop score difference between the preinsertion and the postremoval scores were similar in the two groups (2.67 ± 1.8 vs. 2.53 ± 1.69, P = 0.76), while insertion to delivery time was 10 h shorter in the 6-h group (20.95 vs. 31.21, P = 0.02; mean difference, -10.26 [95% CI, -19.0 to -1.51]). The other secondary outcomes remained similar in both groups.
Conclusion: In women undergoing induction of labor who have a cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on admission transvaginal ultrasound, removing a double balloon device after 6 h achieved similar Bishop score changes as removal after 12 h, but significantly reduced the time to delivery. REGISTRATION AT CLINICAL TRIALS: https://classic.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.