基于 BIOMOD2 和土地利用数据的青藏高原两种特有草原毛虫潜在栖息地比较研究

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Insects Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.3390/insects15100781
Chuanji Li, Yunxiang Liu, Youpeng Lai, Hainan Shao
{"title":"基于 BIOMOD2 和土地利用数据的青藏高原两种特有草原毛虫潜在栖息地比较研究","authors":"Chuanji Li, Yunxiang Liu, Youpeng Lai, Hainan Shao","doi":"10.3390/insects15100781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study has systematically investigated and compared the geographical distribution patterns and population density of <i>G. menyuanensis</i> (<i>Gm</i>) and <i>G. qinghaiensis</i> (<i>Gq</i>), which are endemic to the QTP region and inflict severe damage. Using a method combining the BIOMOD2 integration model (incorporating nine ecological niche models) and current species distribution data, this study has compared changes in potential habitats and distribution centers of these two species during ancient, present, and future climate periods and conducted a correlation test on the prediction results with land use types. The study results indicate that there are differences in geographical distribution patterns, distribution elevations, and population density of these two species. Compared with single models, the integration model exhibits prominent accuracy and stability with higher KAPPA, TSS, and AUC values. The distribution of suitable habitats for these two species is significantly affected by climatic temperature and precipitation. There is a significant difference between the potential habitats of these two species. <i>Gm</i> and <i>Gq</i> are distributed in the northeastern boundary area and the central and eastern areas of the QTP, respectively. The areas of their suitable habitats are significantly and positively correlated with the area of grassland among all land use types of QTP, with no correlations with the areas of other land use types of QTP. The potential habitats of both species during the paleoclimate period were located in the eastern and southeastern boundary areas of the QTP. During the paleoclimate period, their potential habitats expanded towards the Hengduan Mountains (low-latitude regions) in the south compared with their current suitable habitats. With the subsequent temperature rising, their distribution centers shifted towards the northeast (high-latitude) regions, which could validate the hypothesis that the Hengduan Mountains were refuges for these species during the glacial period. In the future, there will be more potential suitable habitats for these two species in the QTP. This study elucidates the ecological factors affecting the current distribution of these grass caterpillars, provides an important reference for designating the prevention and control areas for <i>Gm</i> and <i>Gq</i>, and helps protect the alpine meadow ecosystem in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":13642,"journal":{"name":"Insects","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Potential Habitats for Two Endemic Grassland Caterpillars on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Based on BIOMOD2 and Land Use Data.\",\"authors\":\"Chuanji Li, Yunxiang Liu, Youpeng Lai, Hainan Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/insects15100781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study has systematically investigated and compared the geographical distribution patterns and population density of <i>G. menyuanensis</i> (<i>Gm</i>) and <i>G. qinghaiensis</i> (<i>Gq</i>), which are endemic to the QTP region and inflict severe damage. Using a method combining the BIOMOD2 integration model (incorporating nine ecological niche models) and current species distribution data, this study has compared changes in potential habitats and distribution centers of these two species during ancient, present, and future climate periods and conducted a correlation test on the prediction results with land use types. The study results indicate that there are differences in geographical distribution patterns, distribution elevations, and population density of these two species. Compared with single models, the integration model exhibits prominent accuracy and stability with higher KAPPA, TSS, and AUC values. The distribution of suitable habitats for these two species is significantly affected by climatic temperature and precipitation. There is a significant difference between the potential habitats of these two species. <i>Gm</i> and <i>Gq</i> are distributed in the northeastern boundary area and the central and eastern areas of the QTP, respectively. The areas of their suitable habitats are significantly and positively correlated with the area of grassland among all land use types of QTP, with no correlations with the areas of other land use types of QTP. The potential habitats of both species during the paleoclimate period were located in the eastern and southeastern boundary areas of the QTP. During the paleoclimate period, their potential habitats expanded towards the Hengduan Mountains (low-latitude regions) in the south compared with their current suitable habitats. With the subsequent temperature rising, their distribution centers shifted towards the northeast (high-latitude) regions, which could validate the hypothesis that the Hengduan Mountains were refuges for these species during the glacial period. In the future, there will be more potential suitable habitats for these two species in the QTP. This study elucidates the ecological factors affecting the current distribution of these grass caterpillars, provides an important reference for designating the prevention and control areas for <i>Gm</i> and <i>Gq</i>, and helps protect the alpine meadow ecosystem in the region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insects\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insects","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究系统地研究和比较了青藏高原地区特有的、危害严重的门源蛙(Gm)和青海蛙(Gq)的地理分布格局和种群密度。本研究采用 BIOMOD2 集成模型(包含 9 个生态位模型)和当前物种分布数据相结合的方法,比较了这两个物种在远古、现在和未来气候时期的潜在栖息地和分布中心的变化,并对预测结果与土地利用类型进行了相关性检验。研究结果表明,这两个物种的地理分布格局、分布海拔和种群密度存在差异。与单一模型相比,集成模型具有更高的准确性和稳定性,KAPPA、TSS 和 AUC 值也更高。这两个物种的适宜栖息地分布受气候温度和降水的影响较大。这两个物种的潜在栖息地之间存在明显差异。Gm和Gq分别分布在QTP的东北部边界地区和中部及东部地区。它们的适宜栖息地面积与QTP所有土地利用类型中的草地面积呈显著正相关,与QTP其他土地利用类型的面积无相关性。这两个物种在古气候时期的潜在栖息地位于QTP的东部和东南部边界地区。在古气候时期,与目前的适宜栖息地相比,它们的潜在栖息地向南扩展到横断山脉(低纬度地区)。随着温度的升高,它们的分布中心向东北部(高纬度地区)转移,这可以验证冰川期横断山脉是这些物种避难所的假设。未来,这两个物种在青藏高原将有更多潜在的适宜栖息地。本研究阐明了影响这两种草履虫当前分布的生态因子,为划定Gm和Gq的防治区提供了重要参考,有助于保护该地区的高山草甸生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Potential Habitats for Two Endemic Grassland Caterpillars on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Based on BIOMOD2 and Land Use Data.

This study has systematically investigated and compared the geographical distribution patterns and population density of G. menyuanensis (Gm) and G. qinghaiensis (Gq), which are endemic to the QTP region and inflict severe damage. Using a method combining the BIOMOD2 integration model (incorporating nine ecological niche models) and current species distribution data, this study has compared changes in potential habitats and distribution centers of these two species during ancient, present, and future climate periods and conducted a correlation test on the prediction results with land use types. The study results indicate that there are differences in geographical distribution patterns, distribution elevations, and population density of these two species. Compared with single models, the integration model exhibits prominent accuracy and stability with higher KAPPA, TSS, and AUC values. The distribution of suitable habitats for these two species is significantly affected by climatic temperature and precipitation. There is a significant difference between the potential habitats of these two species. Gm and Gq are distributed in the northeastern boundary area and the central and eastern areas of the QTP, respectively. The areas of their suitable habitats are significantly and positively correlated with the area of grassland among all land use types of QTP, with no correlations with the areas of other land use types of QTP. The potential habitats of both species during the paleoclimate period were located in the eastern and southeastern boundary areas of the QTP. During the paleoclimate period, their potential habitats expanded towards the Hengduan Mountains (low-latitude regions) in the south compared with their current suitable habitats. With the subsequent temperature rising, their distribution centers shifted towards the northeast (high-latitude) regions, which could validate the hypothesis that the Hengduan Mountains were refuges for these species during the glacial period. In the future, there will be more potential suitable habitats for these two species in the QTP. This study elucidates the ecological factors affecting the current distribution of these grass caterpillars, provides an important reference for designating the prevention and control areas for Gm and Gq, and helps protect the alpine meadow ecosystem in the region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insects
Insects Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1013
审稿时长
21.77 days
期刊介绍: Insects (ISSN 2075-4450) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of entomology published by MDPI online quarterly. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications related to the biology, physiology and the behavior of insects and arthropods. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信