利用大脑皮层复杂性诊断阿尔茨海默病的机器学习模型。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2024.1434589
Shaofan Jiang, Siyu Yang, Kaiji Deng, Rifeng Jiang, Yunjing Xue
{"title":"利用大脑皮层复杂性诊断阿尔茨海默病的机器学习模型。","authors":"Shaofan Jiang, Siyu Yang, Kaiji Deng, Rifeng Jiang, Yunjing Xue","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2024.1434589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models (MLMs) to diagnose Alzheimer's disease (AD) using cortical complexity indicated by fractal dimension (FD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 296 participants with normal cognitive (NC) function and 182 with AD from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative database were randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts. Then, FDs, demographic characteristics, baseline global cognitive function scales [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)], phospho-tau (p-tau 181), amyloidβ-42/40, apolipoprotein E (APOE) and polygenic hazard score (PHS) were collected to establish multiple MLMs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate model performance. Participants from our institution (<i>n</i> = 66; 33 with NC and 33 with AD) served as external validation cohorts to validate the MLMs. Decision curve analysis was used to estimate the models' clinical values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FDs from 30 out of 69 regions showed significant alteration. All MLMs were conducted based on the 30 significantly different FDs. The FD model had good accuracy in predicting AD in three cohorts [area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) = 0.842, 0.808, and 0.803]. There were no statistically significant differences in AUC values between the FD model and the other combined models in the training and internal validation cohorts except MoCA + FD and FAQ + FD models. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model showed the best predictive efficiency in three cohorts (AUC = 0.951, 0.931, and 0.955) and had the highest clinical net benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FD model showed favorable diagnostic performance for AD. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model can predict AD with the highest efficiency and could be used as a non-invasive diagnostic method.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"16 ","pages":"1434589"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning models for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease using brain cortical complexity.\",\"authors\":\"Shaofan Jiang, Siyu Yang, Kaiji Deng, Rifeng Jiang, Yunjing Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnagi.2024.1434589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models (MLMs) to diagnose Alzheimer's disease (AD) using cortical complexity indicated by fractal dimension (FD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 296 participants with normal cognitive (NC) function and 182 with AD from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative database were randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts. Then, FDs, demographic characteristics, baseline global cognitive function scales [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)], phospho-tau (p-tau 181), amyloidβ-42/40, apolipoprotein E (APOE) and polygenic hazard score (PHS) were collected to establish multiple MLMs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate model performance. Participants from our institution (<i>n</i> = 66; 33 with NC and 33 with AD) served as external validation cohorts to validate the MLMs. Decision curve analysis was used to estimate the models' clinical values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FDs from 30 out of 69 regions showed significant alteration. All MLMs were conducted based on the 30 significantly different FDs. The FD model had good accuracy in predicting AD in three cohorts [area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) = 0.842, 0.808, and 0.803]. There were no statistically significant differences in AUC values between the FD model and the other combined models in the training and internal validation cohorts except MoCA + FD and FAQ + FD models. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model showed the best predictive efficiency in three cohorts (AUC = 0.951, 0.931, and 0.955) and had the highest clinical net benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FD model showed favorable diagnostic performance for AD. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model can predict AD with the highest efficiency and could be used as a non-invasive diagnostic method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1434589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1434589\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1434589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在开发和验证机器学习模型(MLMs),利用分形维度(FD)来诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD):本研究旨在开发和验证机器学习模型(MLM),利用分形维度(FD)显示的皮质复杂性诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD):方法: 将AD神经影像倡议数据库中认知功能正常(NC)的296名参与者和患有AD的182名参与者随机分为训练组和内部验证组。然后,收集FDs、人口统计学特征、基线全球认知功能量表[蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、功能活动问卷(FAQ)、全球恶化量表(GDS)、神经精神量表(NPI)]、磷酸化tau(p-tau 181)、淀粉样β-42/40、脂蛋白E(APOE)和多基因危险评分(PHS),以建立多个MLM。接收者操作特征曲线用于评估模型的性能。本机构的参与者(n = 66;33 位 NC 患者和 33 位 AD 患者)作为外部验证队列来验证 MLM。决策曲线分析用于估算模型的临床价值:结果:69个区域中有30个区域的FDs出现了显著变化。所有多变量模型都是基于这 30 个明显不同的 FDs 建立的。在三个队列中,FD模型在预测AD方面具有良好的准确性[接收者操作特征曲线下面积(ROC)(AUC)=0.842、0.808和0.803]。在训练队列和内部验证队列中,除MoCA + FD和FAQ + FD模型外,FD模型与其他组合模型的AUC值在统计学上没有显著差异。在MLM中,MoCA + FD模型在三个队列中显示出最好的预测效率(AUC = 0.951、0.931和0.955),并具有最高的临床净效益:结论:FD模型显示出良好的AD诊断性能。结论:FD模型对AD具有良好的诊断性能,在多模型中,MoCA + FD模型预测AD的效率最高,可作为一种非侵入性诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning models for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease using brain cortical complexity.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models (MLMs) to diagnose Alzheimer's disease (AD) using cortical complexity indicated by fractal dimension (FD).

Methods: A total of 296 participants with normal cognitive (NC) function and 182 with AD from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative database were randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts. Then, FDs, demographic characteristics, baseline global cognitive function scales [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)], phospho-tau (p-tau 181), amyloidβ-42/40, apolipoprotein E (APOE) and polygenic hazard score (PHS) were collected to establish multiple MLMs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate model performance. Participants from our institution (n = 66; 33 with NC and 33 with AD) served as external validation cohorts to validate the MLMs. Decision curve analysis was used to estimate the models' clinical values.

Results: The FDs from 30 out of 69 regions showed significant alteration. All MLMs were conducted based on the 30 significantly different FDs. The FD model had good accuracy in predicting AD in three cohorts [area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) = 0.842, 0.808, and 0.803]. There were no statistically significant differences in AUC values between the FD model and the other combined models in the training and internal validation cohorts except MoCA + FD and FAQ + FD models. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model showed the best predictive efficiency in three cohorts (AUC = 0.951, 0.931, and 0.955) and had the highest clinical net benefit.

Conclusion: The FD model showed favorable diagnostic performance for AD. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model can predict AD with the highest efficiency and could be used as a non-invasive diagnostic method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信