无头实心螺钉和有头螺钉治疗精英运动员 II 区和 III 区第五跖骨骨折的临床和影像学效果比较。

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-10-20 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114241281452
David Cho, Stephanie Eble, Saanchi Kukadia, Oliver Hansen, Martin O'Malley, Mark Drakos
{"title":"无头实心螺钉和有头螺钉治疗精英运动员 II 区和 III 区第五跖骨骨折的临床和影像学效果比较。","authors":"David Cho, Stephanie Eble, Saanchi Kukadia, Oliver Hansen, Martin O'Malley, Mark Drakos","doi":"10.1177/24730114241281452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zone II and III fifth metatarsal (5-MT) fractures among athletes are typically managed with percutaneous fixation following anatomic reduction. However, screw head discomfort and refracture after bone union can occur because of the loads placed on the foot during play. Several hardware systems that use a smaller screw head compared to traditional hardware systems have been developed to minimize the rate of postoperative hardware complications. This study compares clinical and radiographic outcomes of 5-MT fractures in elite athletes treated with a solid headless screw vs a solid headed screw. We hypothesized that the headless screw would be associated with faster union rates, faster clearance times, and lower incidence of symptomatic hardware compared to the headed screw.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Athletes competing at a collegiate level or higher treated for a zone II or III 5-MT fracture between 2016 and 2022 by 2 surgeons fellowship-trained in foot and ankle orthopaedics were screened. Operative notes were reviewed to determine the hardware system used. Subjects were divided based on the hardware system used during operation: headed screw and headless screw. Time to radiographic union, time to full clearance, and return to competition were determined. Postoperative complications, including nonunions, need for revision, need for hardware removal, and refractures were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty eligible patients (44 feet) were identified. The solid headed screw group included 20 patients (21 fractures), and the solid headless screw group included 20 patients (23 fractures). Average time to union for the headed screw group was 11.78 (range, 5.86-19.00) weeks; average time to union for the headless screw group was 11.65 (range, 6.00-22.57) weeks (<i>P</i> = .93). Nineteen out of twenty (95%) patients were able to return to competition in both groups. Average time to return to competition for the headed screw group was 26.9 (range, 10.00-47.86) weeks, while average time for the headless screw group was 21.2 (range, 6.86-55.00) weeks (<i>P</i> = .55). The overall complication rate for the headed screw was 23.8%, which was not statistically different from the overall complication rate for the headless screw of 13.0% (<i>P</i> = .35).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this relatively small sample of elite athletes undergoing operative fixation of a 5-MT fracture, fixation using either a headless or headed screw system had similar good outcomes in regard to times to union, return to competition, and complication rate regardless of solid screw head type used.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"9 4","pages":"24730114241281452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Solid Headless and Headed Screws in the Treatment of Zone II and III Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Elite Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"David Cho, Stephanie Eble, Saanchi Kukadia, Oliver Hansen, Martin O'Malley, Mark Drakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24730114241281452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zone II and III fifth metatarsal (5-MT) fractures among athletes are typically managed with percutaneous fixation following anatomic reduction. However, screw head discomfort and refracture after bone union can occur because of the loads placed on the foot during play. Several hardware systems that use a smaller screw head compared to traditional hardware systems have been developed to minimize the rate of postoperative hardware complications. This study compares clinical and radiographic outcomes of 5-MT fractures in elite athletes treated with a solid headless screw vs a solid headed screw. We hypothesized that the headless screw would be associated with faster union rates, faster clearance times, and lower incidence of symptomatic hardware compared to the headed screw.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Athletes competing at a collegiate level or higher treated for a zone II or III 5-MT fracture between 2016 and 2022 by 2 surgeons fellowship-trained in foot and ankle orthopaedics were screened. Operative notes were reviewed to determine the hardware system used. Subjects were divided based on the hardware system used during operation: headed screw and headless screw. Time to radiographic union, time to full clearance, and return to competition were determined. Postoperative complications, including nonunions, need for revision, need for hardware removal, and refractures were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty eligible patients (44 feet) were identified. The solid headed screw group included 20 patients (21 fractures), and the solid headless screw group included 20 patients (23 fractures). Average time to union for the headed screw group was 11.78 (range, 5.86-19.00) weeks; average time to union for the headless screw group was 11.65 (range, 6.00-22.57) weeks (<i>P</i> = .93). Nineteen out of twenty (95%) patients were able to return to competition in both groups. Average time to return to competition for the headed screw group was 26.9 (range, 10.00-47.86) weeks, while average time for the headless screw group was 21.2 (range, 6.86-55.00) weeks (<i>P</i> = .55). The overall complication rate for the headed screw was 23.8%, which was not statistically different from the overall complication rate for the headless screw of 13.0% (<i>P</i> = .35).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this relatively small sample of elite athletes undergoing operative fixation of a 5-MT fracture, fixation using either a headless or headed screw system had similar good outcomes in regard to times to union, return to competition, and complication rate regardless of solid screw head type used.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"24730114241281452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494517/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241281452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241281452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动员的第二区和第三区第五跖骨(5-MT)骨折通常在解剖复位后采用经皮固定治疗。然而,由于比赛时足部所承受的负荷,在骨结合后可能会出现螺钉头不适和再骨折。为了将术后硬件并发症的发生率降至最低,目前已开发出几种使用比传统硬件系统更小螺钉头的硬件系统。本研究比较了使用无头实心螺钉和有头实心螺钉治疗精英运动员 5-MT 骨折的临床和影像学结果。我们假设,与有头螺钉相比,无头螺钉的结合率更快,清理时间更短,无症状硬件的发生率更低:筛选了在 2016 年至 2022 年期间接受过足踝骨科研究培训的两名外科医生治疗 II 区或 III 区 5-MT 骨折的大学或更高级别运动员。对手术记录进行审查,以确定所使用的硬件系统。根据手术中使用的硬件系统将受试者分为:有头螺钉和无头螺钉。确定放射学结合时间、完全清除时间和重返赛场时间。此外,还记录了术后并发症,包括未愈合、需要翻修、需要移除硬件和再骨折:共确定了 40 名符合条件的患者(44 英尺)。有头实心螺钉组包括20名患者(21处骨折),无头实心螺钉组包括20名患者(23处骨折)。有头螺钉组的平均愈合时间为 11.78 周(范围:5.86-19.00);无头螺钉组的平均愈合时间为 11.65 周(范围:6.00-22.57)(P = .93)。两组 20 位患者中有 19 位(95%)可以重返赛场。有头螺钉组患者恢复比赛的平均时间为 26.9 周(范围为 10.00-47.86),而无头螺钉组患者恢复比赛的平均时间为 21.2 周(范围为 6.86-55.00)(P = .55)。有头螺钉组的总体并发症发生率为 23.8%,与无头螺钉组的总体并发症发生率 13.0% 没有统计学差异(P = .35):结论:在这一相对较小的精英运动员5-MT骨折手术固定样本中,使用无头螺钉或有头螺钉系统进行固定,无论使用哪种实心螺钉头,在愈合时间、重返赛场和并发症发生率方面都有相似的良好结果:证据等级:III级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Solid Headless and Headed Screws in the Treatment of Zone II and III Fifth Metatarsal Fractures in Elite Athletes.

Background: Zone II and III fifth metatarsal (5-MT) fractures among athletes are typically managed with percutaneous fixation following anatomic reduction. However, screw head discomfort and refracture after bone union can occur because of the loads placed on the foot during play. Several hardware systems that use a smaller screw head compared to traditional hardware systems have been developed to minimize the rate of postoperative hardware complications. This study compares clinical and radiographic outcomes of 5-MT fractures in elite athletes treated with a solid headless screw vs a solid headed screw. We hypothesized that the headless screw would be associated with faster union rates, faster clearance times, and lower incidence of symptomatic hardware compared to the headed screw.

Methods: Athletes competing at a collegiate level or higher treated for a zone II or III 5-MT fracture between 2016 and 2022 by 2 surgeons fellowship-trained in foot and ankle orthopaedics were screened. Operative notes were reviewed to determine the hardware system used. Subjects were divided based on the hardware system used during operation: headed screw and headless screw. Time to radiographic union, time to full clearance, and return to competition were determined. Postoperative complications, including nonunions, need for revision, need for hardware removal, and refractures were also noted.

Results: Forty eligible patients (44 feet) were identified. The solid headed screw group included 20 patients (21 fractures), and the solid headless screw group included 20 patients (23 fractures). Average time to union for the headed screw group was 11.78 (range, 5.86-19.00) weeks; average time to union for the headless screw group was 11.65 (range, 6.00-22.57) weeks (P = .93). Nineteen out of twenty (95%) patients were able to return to competition in both groups. Average time to return to competition for the headed screw group was 26.9 (range, 10.00-47.86) weeks, while average time for the headless screw group was 21.2 (range, 6.86-55.00) weeks (P = .55). The overall complication rate for the headed screw was 23.8%, which was not statistically different from the overall complication rate for the headless screw of 13.0% (P = .35).

Conclusion: In this relatively small sample of elite athletes undergoing operative fixation of a 5-MT fracture, fixation using either a headless or headed screw system had similar good outcomes in regard to times to union, return to competition, and complication rate regardless of solid screw head type used.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信