将新型通用树脂粘接剂与二硅酸盐玻璃陶瓷粘接的不同粘接方法。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anna Caroliny Detogni, Vitaliano Gomes Araújo-Neto, Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
{"title":"将新型通用树脂粘接剂与二硅酸盐玻璃陶瓷粘接的不同粘接方法。","authors":"Anna Caroliny Detogni, Vitaliano Gomes Araújo-Neto, Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti","doi":"10.1111/eos.13024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) when bonding a universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic using different adhesive protocols. Sixty specimens were etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20 s and assigned to one of four treatment protocols (n = 15): The Positive control protocol comprised use of a universal adhesive system + adhesive resin cement; the Test1 protocol comprised use of a new universal adhesive system + universal resin cement; the Test2 protocol comprised use of a silane coupling agent + universal resin cement; and the use of a universal resin cement without adhesive and silane served as the Negative control. One of the two resin cement cylinders built on each specimen in each group was used to test for 24-h SBS, while the other was thermocycled and then tested for SBS. Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Weibull analysis. The negative control (24 h) showed the lowest SBS mean value. The Test2 protocol resulted in the highest SBS mean value after thermocycling. Adhesive and mixed failures were prevalent in all groups. No statistical difference in m values was observed among the groups at 24 h. After thermocycling, the two Test protocols showed the highest m values. The m values were significantly lower after thermocycling than at 24 h for all groups. After thermal aging, The Test2 protocol resulted in a statistically significantly higher SBS mean value after thermal aging than seen for the other groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different adhesive approaches for the bonding of a new universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Caroliny Detogni, Vitaliano Gomes Araújo-Neto, Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eos.13024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) when bonding a universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic using different adhesive protocols. Sixty specimens were etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20 s and assigned to one of four treatment protocols (n = 15): The Positive control protocol comprised use of a universal adhesive system + adhesive resin cement; the Test1 protocol comprised use of a new universal adhesive system + universal resin cement; the Test2 protocol comprised use of a silane coupling agent + universal resin cement; and the use of a universal resin cement without adhesive and silane served as the Negative control. One of the two resin cement cylinders built on each specimen in each group was used to test for 24-h SBS, while the other was thermocycled and then tested for SBS. Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Weibull analysis. The negative control (24 h) showed the lowest SBS mean value. The Test2 protocol resulted in the highest SBS mean value after thermocycling. Adhesive and mixed failures were prevalent in all groups. No statistical difference in m values was observed among the groups at 24 h. After thermocycling, the two Test protocols showed the highest m values. The m values were significantly lower after thermocycling than at 24 h for all groups. After thermal aging, The Test2 protocol resulted in a statistically significantly higher SBS mean value after thermal aging than seen for the other groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oral Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.13024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.13024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估使用不同粘接方案将通用树脂粘接剂粘接到二硅酸盐玻璃陶瓷时的剪切粘接强度(SBS)。60 个试样用 10%氢氟酸(HF)腐蚀 20 秒,然后分配到四种处理方案之一(n = 15):阳性对照方案包括使用通用粘合剂系统+粘合树脂水泥;测试 1 方案包括使用新型通用粘合剂系统+通用树脂水泥;测试 2 方案包括使用硅烷偶联剂+通用树脂水泥;使用不含粘合剂和硅烷的通用树脂水泥作为阴性对照。在每组试样上制作的两个树脂水泥圆柱体中,一个用于测试 24 小时 SBS,另一个进行热循环,然后测试 SBS。对数据进行了双向方差分析、Tukey 检验和 Weibull 分析。阴性对照(24 小时)的 SBS 平均值最低。热循环后,Test2 方案的 SBS 平均值最高。所有组中都普遍存在粘合和混合故障。热循环后,两个 Test 方案的 m 值最高。所有组的 m 值在热循环后都明显低于 24 小时时的值。热老化后,Test2 方案的 SBS 平均值在统计上明显高于其他组别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different adhesive approaches for the bonding of a new universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic.

This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) when bonding a universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic using different adhesive protocols. Sixty specimens were etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 20 s and assigned to one of four treatment protocols (n = 15): The Positive control protocol comprised use of a universal adhesive system + adhesive resin cement; the Test1 protocol comprised use of a new universal adhesive system + universal resin cement; the Test2 protocol comprised use of a silane coupling agent + universal resin cement; and the use of a universal resin cement without adhesive and silane served as the Negative control. One of the two resin cement cylinders built on each specimen in each group was used to test for 24-h SBS, while the other was thermocycled and then tested for SBS. Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Weibull analysis. The negative control (24 h) showed the lowest SBS mean value. The Test2 protocol resulted in the highest SBS mean value after thermocycling. Adhesive and mixed failures were prevalent in all groups. No statistical difference in m values was observed among the groups at 24 h. After thermocycling, the two Test protocols showed the highest m values. The m values were significantly lower after thermocycling than at 24 h for all groups. After thermal aging, The Test2 protocol resulted in a statistically significantly higher SBS mean value after thermal aging than seen for the other groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信