糖尿病与老年人心血管事件和全因死亡率的风险:对五项前瞻性研究的个人参与者数据分析。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Valerie Aponte Ribero, Orestis Efthimiou, Nazanin Abolhassani, Heba Alwan, Douglas C Bauer, Séverine Henrard, Antoine Christiaens, Denis O'Mahony, Wilma Knol, Mike J L Peters, Arnaud Chiolero, Drahomir Aujesky, Gérard Waeber, Nicolas Rodondi, Cinzia Del Giovane, Baris Gencer
{"title":"糖尿病与老年人心血管事件和全因死亡率的风险:对五项前瞻性研究的个人参与者数据分析。","authors":"Valerie Aponte Ribero, Orestis Efthimiou, Nazanin Abolhassani, Heba Alwan, Douglas C Bauer, Séverine Henrard, Antoine Christiaens, Denis O'Mahony, Wilma Knol, Mike J L Peters, Arnaud Chiolero, Drahomir Aujesky, Gérard Waeber, Nicolas Rodondi, Cinzia Del Giovane, Baris Gencer","doi":"10.1111/eci.14340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines and studies provide conflicting information on whether type 2 diabetes (T2D) should be considered a coronary heart disease risk (CHD) equivalent in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We synthesized participant-level data on 82,723 individuals aged ≥65 years from five prospective studies in two-stage meta-analyses. We estimated multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of T2D (presence versus absence) on a primary composite outcome defined as cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the components of the composite. We evaluated CHD risk equivalence by comparing outcomes between individuals with T2D but no CHD versus CHD but no T2D.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of participants was 71 years, 20% had T2D and 17% had CHD at baseline. A total of 29,474 participants (36%) experienced the composite outcome. Baseline T2D was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality versus no T2D (HR 1.44, 95% CI [1.40-1.49]). The association was weaker in individuals aged ≥75 years versus 65-74 years (HR 1.32 [1.19-1.46] vs. 1.56 [1.50-1.62]; p-value for interaction = .032). Compared to individuals with CHD but no T2D, individuals with T2D but no CHD had a similar risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.95 [0.85-1.07]), but a lower risk of cardiovascular events (HR 0.76 [0.59-0.98]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T2D was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in older adults, but T2D without CHD conferred lower risk of cardiovascular events compared to CHD without T2D. Our results suggest that T2D should not be considered a CHD risk equivalent in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e14340"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among older adults: an individual participant data analysis of five prospective studies.\",\"authors\":\"Valerie Aponte Ribero, Orestis Efthimiou, Nazanin Abolhassani, Heba Alwan, Douglas C Bauer, Séverine Henrard, Antoine Christiaens, Denis O'Mahony, Wilma Knol, Mike J L Peters, Arnaud Chiolero, Drahomir Aujesky, Gérard Waeber, Nicolas Rodondi, Cinzia Del Giovane, Baris Gencer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eci.14340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines and studies provide conflicting information on whether type 2 diabetes (T2D) should be considered a coronary heart disease risk (CHD) equivalent in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We synthesized participant-level data on 82,723 individuals aged ≥65 years from five prospective studies in two-stage meta-analyses. We estimated multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of T2D (presence versus absence) on a primary composite outcome defined as cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the components of the composite. We evaluated CHD risk equivalence by comparing outcomes between individuals with T2D but no CHD versus CHD but no T2D.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of participants was 71 years, 20% had T2D and 17% had CHD at baseline. A total of 29,474 participants (36%) experienced the composite outcome. Baseline T2D was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality versus no T2D (HR 1.44, 95% CI [1.40-1.49]). The association was weaker in individuals aged ≥75 years versus 65-74 years (HR 1.32 [1.19-1.46] vs. 1.56 [1.50-1.62]; p-value for interaction = .032). Compared to individuals with CHD but no T2D, individuals with T2D but no CHD had a similar risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.95 [0.85-1.07]), but a lower risk of cardiovascular events (HR 0.76 [0.59-0.98]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T2D was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in older adults, but T2D without CHD conferred lower risk of cardiovascular events compared to CHD without T2D. Our results suggest that T2D should not be considered a CHD risk equivalent in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14340\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于 2 型糖尿病(T2D)是否应被视为老年人冠心病风险(CHD)的指南和研究提供了相互矛盾的信息:关于 2 型糖尿病(T2D)是否应被视为老年人冠心病风险(CHD)的等同物,相关指南和研究提供了相互矛盾的信息:我们在两阶段荟萃分析中综合了五项前瞻性研究中 82,723 名年龄≥65 岁的参与者的数据。我们估算了T2D(存在与不存在)对主要综合结果(心血管事件或全因死亡率)的多变量调整危险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。次要结果是综合结果的组成部分。我们通过比较有 T2D 但无 CHD 的个体与有 CHD 但无 T2D 的个体之间的结果来评估 CHD 风险等效性:参与者的中位年龄为 71 岁,20% 患有 T2D,17% 患有冠心病。共有 29,474 名参与者(36%)出现了综合结果。与无 T2D 相比,基线 T2D 与更高的心血管事件或全因死亡风险相关(HR 1.44,95% CI [1.40-1.49])。年龄≥75 岁的人与 65-74 岁的人之间的相关性较弱(HR 1.32 [1.19-1.46] vs. 1.56 [1.50-1.62];交互作用的 p 值 = .032)。与有心脏病但无T2D的人相比,有T2D但无心脏病的人发生综合结果的风险相似(HR 0.95 [0.85-1.07]),但发生心血管事件的风险较低(HR 0.76 [0.59-0.98]):结论:T2D与老年人心血管事件和全因死亡率风险增加有关,但与无T2D的冠心病相比,无冠心病的T2D导致心血管事件的风险较低。我们的研究结果表明,在老年人中,T2D不应被视为等同于冠心病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among older adults: an individual participant data analysis of five prospective studies.

Background: Guidelines and studies provide conflicting information on whether type 2 diabetes (T2D) should be considered a coronary heart disease risk (CHD) equivalent in older adults.

Methods: We synthesized participant-level data on 82,723 individuals aged ≥65 years from five prospective studies in two-stage meta-analyses. We estimated multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of T2D (presence versus absence) on a primary composite outcome defined as cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the components of the composite. We evaluated CHD risk equivalence by comparing outcomes between individuals with T2D but no CHD versus CHD but no T2D.

Results: The median age of participants was 71 years, 20% had T2D and 17% had CHD at baseline. A total of 29,474 participants (36%) experienced the composite outcome. Baseline T2D was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality versus no T2D (HR 1.44, 95% CI [1.40-1.49]). The association was weaker in individuals aged ≥75 years versus 65-74 years (HR 1.32 [1.19-1.46] vs. 1.56 [1.50-1.62]; p-value for interaction = .032). Compared to individuals with CHD but no T2D, individuals with T2D but no CHD had a similar risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.95 [0.85-1.07]), but a lower risk of cardiovascular events (HR 0.76 [0.59-0.98]).

Conclusions: T2D was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in older adults, but T2D without CHD conferred lower risk of cardiovascular events compared to CHD without T2D. Our results suggest that T2D should not be considered a CHD risk equivalent in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信