{"title":"根据国际浆液细胞病理学报告系统(TIS)对非典型积液进行重新分类及其恶性风险:机构经验。","authors":"Kutsal Doğan, Olcay Kurtulan, Sevgen Onder","doi":"10.1002/dc.25415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serous effusion fluids serve as crucial cytological materials in diagnosing the underlying causes of fluid accumulation in various body cavities. The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) outlined atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and suspicious for malignancy (SFM) as two intermediate categories for atypical fluids.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In our study, cases diagnosed as \"atypical\" by an experienced cytopathologist in the Hacettepe University Department of Pathology, between 2014 and 2023, were re-categorized according to TIS. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for AUS and SFM categories was calculated. Additionally, cases were re-evaluated according to the 5-tier categorical system by two observers with different level of experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3501 effusion fluids were included in the study, evaluated between 2014 and 2023. 50.7% of the cases were male, and 49.3% were female. 55.2% of the cases were pleural fluid, 41.5% were peritoneal fluid, and 3.3% were pericardial fluid. Two hundred sixty five cases (7.6%) were non-diagnostic, 2160 (61.7%) were negative for malignancy, 111 (3.2%) were AUS, 83 (2.4%) were SFM, and 883 (25.2%) were malignant (M). ROM calculated 27% for AUS, 49% for SFM 49%. The interobserver agreement for AUS was 46% with kappa value of 0.162, and 42% for SFM with kappa value of 0.188.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differentiation of atypical cases into AUS and SFM is effective in determining the ROM. The interobserver agreement tends to be lower in intermediate categories compared to others, emphasizing the potential significance of clinical expertise in diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":"58-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Categorization and Risk of Malignancy of Atypical Effusions According to the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS): An Institutional Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Kutsal Doğan, Olcay Kurtulan, Sevgen Onder\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dc.25415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serous effusion fluids serve as crucial cytological materials in diagnosing the underlying causes of fluid accumulation in various body cavities. The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) outlined atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and suspicious for malignancy (SFM) as two intermediate categories for atypical fluids.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In our study, cases diagnosed as \\\"atypical\\\" by an experienced cytopathologist in the Hacettepe University Department of Pathology, between 2014 and 2023, were re-categorized according to TIS. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for AUS and SFM categories was calculated. Additionally, cases were re-evaluated according to the 5-tier categorical system by two observers with different level of experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3501 effusion fluids were included in the study, evaluated between 2014 and 2023. 50.7% of the cases were male, and 49.3% were female. 55.2% of the cases were pleural fluid, 41.5% were peritoneal fluid, and 3.3% were pericardial fluid. Two hundred sixty five cases (7.6%) were non-diagnostic, 2160 (61.7%) were negative for malignancy, 111 (3.2%) were AUS, 83 (2.4%) were SFM, and 883 (25.2%) were malignant (M). ROM calculated 27% for AUS, 49% for SFM 49%. The interobserver agreement for AUS was 46% with kappa value of 0.162, and 42% for SFM with kappa value of 0.188.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The differentiation of atypical cases into AUS and SFM is effective in determining the ROM. The interobserver agreement tends to be lower in intermediate categories compared to others, emphasizing the potential significance of clinical expertise in diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"58-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:血清渗出液是诊断各种体腔积液根本原因的重要细胞学材料。国际浆液细胞病理学报告系统(TIS)将意义未定的非典型(AUS)和恶性可疑(SFM)作为非典型液体的两个中间类别:在我们的研究中,对哈塞梯大学病理系经验丰富的细胞病理学家在 2014 年至 2023 年间诊断为 "非典型 "的病例根据 TIS 进行了重新分类。计算了 AUS 和 SFM 类别的恶性肿瘤风险 (ROM)。此外,由两名具有不同经验水平的观察员根据 5 级分类系统对病例进行了重新评估:研究共纳入 3501 例流出液,评估时间为 2014 年至 2023 年。50.7%的病例为男性,49.3%为女性。55.2%的病例为胸腔积液,41.5%为腹腔积液,3.3%为心包积液。265例(7.6%)无法确诊,2160例(61.7%)为恶性肿瘤阴性,111例(3.2%)为AUS,83例(2.4%)为SFM,883例(25.2%)为恶性肿瘤(M)。AUS和SFM的ROM计算结果分别为27%和49%。AUS的观察者间一致性为46%,kappa值为0.162;SFM的观察者间一致性为42%,kappa值为0.188:结论:将不典型病例分为 AUS 和 SFM 对确定 ROM 很有效。结论:将不典型病例分为 AUS 和 SFM 对确定 ROM 很有效,但与其他类别相比,中间类别的观察者之间的一致性往往较低,这强调了临床专业知识在诊断中的潜在意义。
Re-Categorization and Risk of Malignancy of Atypical Effusions According to the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS): An Institutional Experience.
Background: Serous effusion fluids serve as crucial cytological materials in diagnosing the underlying causes of fluid accumulation in various body cavities. The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS) outlined atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and suspicious for malignancy (SFM) as two intermediate categories for atypical fluids.
Materials and methods: In our study, cases diagnosed as "atypical" by an experienced cytopathologist in the Hacettepe University Department of Pathology, between 2014 and 2023, were re-categorized according to TIS. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for AUS and SFM categories was calculated. Additionally, cases were re-evaluated according to the 5-tier categorical system by two observers with different level of experience.
Results: A total of 3501 effusion fluids were included in the study, evaluated between 2014 and 2023. 50.7% of the cases were male, and 49.3% were female. 55.2% of the cases were pleural fluid, 41.5% were peritoneal fluid, and 3.3% were pericardial fluid. Two hundred sixty five cases (7.6%) were non-diagnostic, 2160 (61.7%) were negative for malignancy, 111 (3.2%) were AUS, 83 (2.4%) were SFM, and 883 (25.2%) were malignant (M). ROM calculated 27% for AUS, 49% for SFM 49%. The interobserver agreement for AUS was 46% with kappa value of 0.162, and 42% for SFM with kappa value of 0.188.
Conclusion: The differentiation of atypical cases into AUS and SFM is effective in determining the ROM. The interobserver agreement tends to be lower in intermediate categories compared to others, emphasizing the potential significance of clinical expertise in diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.