加拿大眼科文献中与公平相关的社会人口统计学报告。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Mostafa Bondok, Rishika Selvakumar, Mohamed S Bondok, Muhammad Khan, Christian El-Hadad, Edsel Ing
{"title":"加拿大眼科文献中与公平相关的社会人口统计学报告。","authors":"Mostafa Bondok, Rishika Selvakumar, Mohamed S Bondok, Muhammad Khan, Christian El-Hadad, Edsel Ing","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the quality and extent of sociodemographic reporting in the contemporary Canadian ophthalmology literature.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All full-length primary studies involving human participants published in the Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology from January 2020 to December 2022 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 669 studies were screened, and 213 studies were eligible for inclusion. Sociodemographic information reported in eligible studies included age (97.18%), sex (88.26%), comorbidities (25.35%), level of education (5.16%), socioeconomic status (2.82%), and occupation (1.14%). Of the relevant studies, 54 (25.35%) included racial or ethnic data. Canadian studies were 1.84 times less likely than studies conducted outside Canada to report race or ethnicity (p = 0.018), but 13 times more likely to report level of education (p < 0.001). Few articles provided information on how racial or ethnic data were collected (12.96%), why the racial or ethnic classification reported in the study was used (5.56%), why race or ethnicity was assessed in the study (24.07%), whether the classification options used were defined by the investigator or the participant (5.56%) or defined the variable race (1.85%). Some studies reported Indigenous participants (18.52%), and no studies with Indigenous participants reported engagement with Indigenous interest holders in the research process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most studies reported age and sex or gender, while the reporting of other equity-relevant sociodemographic data was low. In particular, the reporting of racial or ethnic data was limited. Improved sociodemographic reporting may help stakeholders better identify and address national disparities in ocular health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reporting of equity-relevant sociodemographics in the Canadian ophthalmology literature.\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Bondok, Rishika Selvakumar, Mohamed S Bondok, Muhammad Khan, Christian El-Hadad, Edsel Ing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the quality and extent of sociodemographic reporting in the contemporary Canadian ophthalmology literature.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All full-length primary studies involving human participants published in the Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology from January 2020 to December 2022 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 669 studies were screened, and 213 studies were eligible for inclusion. Sociodemographic information reported in eligible studies included age (97.18%), sex (88.26%), comorbidities (25.35%), level of education (5.16%), socioeconomic status (2.82%), and occupation (1.14%). Of the relevant studies, 54 (25.35%) included racial or ethnic data. Canadian studies were 1.84 times less likely than studies conducted outside Canada to report race or ethnicity (p = 0.018), but 13 times more likely to report level of education (p < 0.001). Few articles provided information on how racial or ethnic data were collected (12.96%), why the racial or ethnic classification reported in the study was used (5.56%), why race or ethnicity was assessed in the study (24.07%), whether the classification options used were defined by the investigator or the participant (5.56%) or defined the variable race (1.85%). Some studies reported Indigenous participants (18.52%), and no studies with Indigenous participants reported engagement with Indigenous interest holders in the research process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most studies reported age and sex or gender, while the reporting of other equity-relevant sociodemographic data was low. In particular, the reporting of racial or ethnic data was limited. Improved sociodemographic reporting may help stakeholders better identify and address national disparities in ocular health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.10.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们确定了当代加拿大眼科文献中社会人口学报告的质量和范围:研究设计:横断面研究:方法:纳入 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在《加拿大眼科杂志》上发表的所有涉及人类参与者的长篇主要研究:结果:共筛选出 669 项研究,其中 213 项符合纳入条件。符合条件的研究中报告的社会人口学信息包括年龄(97.18%)、性别(88.26%)、合并症(25.35%)、教育水平(5.16%)、社会经济地位(2.82%)和职业(1.14%)。在相关研究中,有 54 项(25.35%)包含种族或民族数据。与加拿大以外的研究相比,加拿大研究报告种族或民族的可能性要低 1.84 倍(p = 0.018),但报告教育水平的可能性要高 13 倍(p < 0.001)。很少有文章提供信息说明种族或人种数据是如何收集的(12.96%),为什么使用研究中报告的种族或人种分类(5.56%),为什么在研究中评估种族或人种(24.07%),使用的分类选项是由研究者还是参与者定义的(5.56%),还是定义了种族变量(1.85%)。一些研究报告了土著参与者(18.52%),但有土著参与者的研究均未报告土著利益持有者参与了研究过程:大多数研究报告了年龄、性别或性 别,而其他与公平相关的社会人口数据报告较少。尤其是种族或民族数据的报告有限。改进社会人口学报告可帮助利益相关者更好地识别和解决眼健康方面的国家差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The reporting of equity-relevant sociodemographics in the Canadian ophthalmology literature.

Objective: To determine the quality and extent of sociodemographic reporting in the contemporary Canadian ophthalmology literature.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: All full-length primary studies involving human participants published in the Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology from January 2020 to December 2022 were included.

Results: A total of 669 studies were screened, and 213 studies were eligible for inclusion. Sociodemographic information reported in eligible studies included age (97.18%), sex (88.26%), comorbidities (25.35%), level of education (5.16%), socioeconomic status (2.82%), and occupation (1.14%). Of the relevant studies, 54 (25.35%) included racial or ethnic data. Canadian studies were 1.84 times less likely than studies conducted outside Canada to report race or ethnicity (p = 0.018), but 13 times more likely to report level of education (p < 0.001). Few articles provided information on how racial or ethnic data were collected (12.96%), why the racial or ethnic classification reported in the study was used (5.56%), why race or ethnicity was assessed in the study (24.07%), whether the classification options used were defined by the investigator or the participant (5.56%) or defined the variable race (1.85%). Some studies reported Indigenous participants (18.52%), and no studies with Indigenous participants reported engagement with Indigenous interest holders in the research process.

Conclusions: Most studies reported age and sex or gender, while the reporting of other equity-relevant sociodemographic data was low. In particular, the reporting of racial or ethnic data was limited. Improved sociodemographic reporting may help stakeholders better identify and address national disparities in ocular health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信