利用机器学习算法预测无症状肾结石:法萨成人队列研究(FACS)的启示。

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Fatemeh Mahmoodi, Aref Andishgar, Eisa Mahmoudi, Alireza Monsef, Sina Bazmi, Reza Tabrizi
{"title":"利用机器学习算法预测无症状肾结石:法萨成人队列研究(FACS)的启示。","authors":"Fatemeh Mahmoodi, Aref Andishgar, Eisa Mahmoudi, Alireza Monsef, Sina Bazmi, Reza Tabrizi","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-06979-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To enhance the identification of individuals at risk of developing clinically significant kidney stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, data from the Fasa Adults Cohort Study were analyzed to explore factors linked to symptomatic and clinically significant kidney stone disease. After cleaning, 10,128 participants with 103 variables were studied. One outcome variable (presence of symptomatic kidney stones) and 102 predictor variables from surveys and tests were assessed. Five Machine learning (ML) algorithms (SVM, RF, KNN, GBM, XGB) were applied to examine kidney stone factors, with performance comparisons made. Data balancing was done using SMOTE, and metrics like accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC were evaluated for each algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The XGB model outperformed others with AUC of 0.60, while RF, GBM, SVC, and KNN had AUC values of 0.58, 0.57, 0.54, and 0.52. RF, GBM, and XGB showed good accuracy at 0.81, 0.81, and 0.77. Top predictors for kidney stones were serum creatinine, salt intake, hospitalization history, sleep duration, and BUN levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML models show promise in evaluating an individual's risk of developing painful kidney stones and recommending early lifestyle changes to reduce this risk. Further research can enhance predictive accuracy and tailor interventions for better prevention/management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"17 1","pages":"318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting symptomatic kidney stones using machine learning algorithms: insights from the Fasa adults cohort study (FACS).\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Mahmoodi, Aref Andishgar, Eisa Mahmoudi, Alireza Monsef, Sina Bazmi, Reza Tabrizi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-024-06979-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To enhance the identification of individuals at risk of developing clinically significant kidney stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, data from the Fasa Adults Cohort Study were analyzed to explore factors linked to symptomatic and clinically significant kidney stone disease. After cleaning, 10,128 participants with 103 variables were studied. One outcome variable (presence of symptomatic kidney stones) and 102 predictor variables from surveys and tests were assessed. Five Machine learning (ML) algorithms (SVM, RF, KNN, GBM, XGB) were applied to examine kidney stone factors, with performance comparisons made. Data balancing was done using SMOTE, and metrics like accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC were evaluated for each algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The XGB model outperformed others with AUC of 0.60, while RF, GBM, SVC, and KNN had AUC values of 0.58, 0.57, 0.54, and 0.52. RF, GBM, and XGB showed good accuracy at 0.81, 0.81, and 0.77. Top predictors for kidney stones were serum creatinine, salt intake, hospitalization history, sleep duration, and BUN levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML models show promise in evaluating an individual's risk of developing painful kidney stones and recommending early lifestyle changes to reduce this risk. Further research can enhance predictive accuracy and tailor interventions for better prevention/management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515596/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06979-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06979-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的加强对有临床症状肾结石风险人群的识别:本研究分析了法萨成人队列研究(Fasa Adults Cohort Study)的数据,以探索与无症状和有临床意义的肾结石疾病相关的因素。经过清理后,共研究了10128名参与者的103个变量。评估了一个结果变量(有症状肾结石)和来自调查和测试的 102 个预测变量。五种机器学习(ML)算法(SVM、RF、KNN、GBM、XGB)被用于研究肾结石因素,并进行了性能比较。使用 SMOTE 进行了数据平衡,并对每种算法的准确度、精确度、灵敏度、特异性、F1 分数和 AUC 等指标进行了评估:XGB 模型的 AUC 值为 0.60,优于其他模型,而 RF、GBM、SVC 和 KNN 的 AUC 值分别为 0.58、0.57、0.54 和 0.52。RF、GBM 和 XGB 的准确度分别为 0.81、0.81 和 0.77。肾结石的首要预测因素是血清肌酐、盐摄入量、住院史、睡眠时间和 BUN 水平:ML模型有望评估个人患疼痛性肾结石的风险,并建议尽早改变生活方式以降低风险。进一步的研究可以提高预测的准确性,并为更好的预防/管理定制干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting symptomatic kidney stones using machine learning algorithms: insights from the Fasa adults cohort study (FACS).

Objectives: To enhance the identification of individuals at risk of developing clinically significant kidney stones.

Methods: In this study, data from the Fasa Adults Cohort Study were analyzed to explore factors linked to symptomatic and clinically significant kidney stone disease. After cleaning, 10,128 participants with 103 variables were studied. One outcome variable (presence of symptomatic kidney stones) and 102 predictor variables from surveys and tests were assessed. Five Machine learning (ML) algorithms (SVM, RF, KNN, GBM, XGB) were applied to examine kidney stone factors, with performance comparisons made. Data balancing was done using SMOTE, and metrics like accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC were evaluated for each algorithm.

Results: The XGB model outperformed others with AUC of 0.60, while RF, GBM, SVC, and KNN had AUC values of 0.58, 0.57, 0.54, and 0.52. RF, GBM, and XGB showed good accuracy at 0.81, 0.81, and 0.77. Top predictors for kidney stones were serum creatinine, salt intake, hospitalization history, sleep duration, and BUN levels.

Conclusions: ML models show promise in evaluating an individual's risk of developing painful kidney stones and recommending early lifestyle changes to reduce this risk. Further research can enhance predictive accuracy and tailor interventions for better prevention/management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信