{"title":"桡骨头骨折并发髌骨软骨损伤的综合分类及其价值。","authors":"Huanxiang Bao, Guoyou Zou, Zhengchun Cao, Haifeng Li, Xiaofei Shen","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-07851-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are defects in the existing classification of capitellar cartilage injury (CCI) concomitant with radial head fracture (RHF). This study aimed to introduce a comprehensive classification of CCI and to analyze its surgical guidance value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the affected site and severity, CCI was classified into four types: Type I - partial-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type II - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type III - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with subchondral bone loss, Type IV - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with thin cortex loss on the border of the capitellum; Different types suggest different surgical methods. Between January 2017 and January 2023, this comprehensive CCI classification was applied in 31 operated patients with CCI concomitant with RHF. The ranges of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the affected limb.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mason Type I-IV RHF accounted for 6.45%, 38.71%, 48.39%, and 6.45%, respectively. Type I-IV CCI accounted for 12.90%, 35.48%, 45.16% and 6.45%, respectively. There was no relationship between the CCI and RHF types (p > 0.05). At the end of the follow-up period of 11-26 months with an average of 16 months, the elbow flexion and extension ROM recovered to (147.39 ± 9.84)°, forearm rotation ROM recovered to (168.74 ± 11.70)°, MEPI score recovered to (89.19 ± 4.17), HSS score recovered to (88.74 ± 4.62), VAS score recovered to (0.50 ± 0.57), indicating significant differences compared to preoperative measurements (p < 0.05). According to the MEPI and HSS scores, the excellent and good rate of functional recovery was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different types of CCI differ not only in pathology but also in treatment methods. Surgical strategy according to the comprehensive CCI classification introduced in this paper may lead to a satisfactory outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive classification and its value of capitellar cartilage injury concomitant with radial head fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Huanxiang Bao, Guoyou Zou, Zhengchun Cao, Haifeng Li, Xiaofei Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-024-07851-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are defects in the existing classification of capitellar cartilage injury (CCI) concomitant with radial head fracture (RHF). This study aimed to introduce a comprehensive classification of CCI and to analyze its surgical guidance value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the affected site and severity, CCI was classified into four types: Type I - partial-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type II - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type III - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with subchondral bone loss, Type IV - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with thin cortex loss on the border of the capitellum; Different types suggest different surgical methods. Between January 2017 and January 2023, this comprehensive CCI classification was applied in 31 operated patients with CCI concomitant with RHF. The ranges of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the affected limb.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mason Type I-IV RHF accounted for 6.45%, 38.71%, 48.39%, and 6.45%, respectively. Type I-IV CCI accounted for 12.90%, 35.48%, 45.16% and 6.45%, respectively. There was no relationship between the CCI and RHF types (p > 0.05). At the end of the follow-up period of 11-26 months with an average of 16 months, the elbow flexion and extension ROM recovered to (147.39 ± 9.84)°, forearm rotation ROM recovered to (168.74 ± 11.70)°, MEPI score recovered to (89.19 ± 4.17), HSS score recovered to (88.74 ± 4.62), VAS score recovered to (0.50 ± 0.57), indicating significant differences compared to preoperative measurements (p < 0.05). According to the MEPI and HSS scores, the excellent and good rate of functional recovery was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different types of CCI differ not only in pathology but also in treatment methods. Surgical strategy according to the comprehensive CCI classification introduced in this paper may lead to a satisfactory outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07851-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07851-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:桡骨头骨折(RHF)并发髌骨软骨损伤(CCI)的现有分类存在缺陷。本研究旨在对 CCI 进行全面分类,并分析其手术指导价值:根据受累部位和严重程度,CCI 被分为四种类型:I型--部分厚度的关节软骨缺失,II型--全厚度的关节软骨缺失,III型--全厚度的关节软骨缺失伴软骨下骨缺失,IV型--全厚度的关节软骨缺失伴帽状腱膜边缘薄皮质缺失;不同类型建议采用不同的手术方法。在 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间,对 31 例同时患有 CCI 和 RHF 的手术患者采用了这种全面的 CCI 分类。结果显示,梅森Ⅰ-Ⅳ型RHF患者的活动范围(ROM)、梅奥肘关节功能指数(MEPI)评分、特殊外科医院(HSS)评分和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于评估患肢的功能恢复情况:梅森 I-IV 型 RHF 分别占 6.45%、38.71%、48.39% 和 6.45%。I-IV 型 CCI 分别占 12.90%、35.48%、45.16% 和 6.45%。CCI与RHF类型之间没有关系(P>0.05)。在11-26个月的随访期(平均16个月)结束时,肘关节屈伸ROM恢复到(147.39±9.84)°,前臂旋转ROM恢复到(168.74±11.70)°,MEPI评分恢复到(89.19±4.17)分,HSS评分恢复到(88.74±4.62)分,VAS评分恢复到(0.50±0.57)分,与术前测量结果相比差异显著(P 结论:不同类型的CCI不仅在功能上存在差异,而且在治疗效果上也存在差异:不同类型的CCI不仅病理不同,治疗方法也不尽相同。根据本文介绍的 CCI 综合分类采取手术策略可能会取得满意的疗效。
Comprehensive classification and its value of capitellar cartilage injury concomitant with radial head fracture.
Background: There are defects in the existing classification of capitellar cartilage injury (CCI) concomitant with radial head fracture (RHF). This study aimed to introduce a comprehensive classification of CCI and to analyze its surgical guidance value.
Methods: According to the affected site and severity, CCI was classified into four types: Type I - partial-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type II - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage, Type III - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with subchondral bone loss, Type IV - full-thickness loss of articular cartilage with thin cortex loss on the border of the capitellum; Different types suggest different surgical methods. Between January 2017 and January 2023, this comprehensive CCI classification was applied in 31 operated patients with CCI concomitant with RHF. The ranges of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the affected limb.
Results: Mason Type I-IV RHF accounted for 6.45%, 38.71%, 48.39%, and 6.45%, respectively. Type I-IV CCI accounted for 12.90%, 35.48%, 45.16% and 6.45%, respectively. There was no relationship between the CCI and RHF types (p > 0.05). At the end of the follow-up period of 11-26 months with an average of 16 months, the elbow flexion and extension ROM recovered to (147.39 ± 9.84)°, forearm rotation ROM recovered to (168.74 ± 11.70)°, MEPI score recovered to (89.19 ± 4.17), HSS score recovered to (88.74 ± 4.62), VAS score recovered to (0.50 ± 0.57), indicating significant differences compared to preoperative measurements (p < 0.05). According to the MEPI and HSS scores, the excellent and good rate of functional recovery was 100%.
Conclusion: Different types of CCI differ not only in pathology but also in treatment methods. Surgical strategy according to the comprehensive CCI classification introduced in this paper may lead to a satisfactory outcome.
期刊介绍:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.