{"title":"瑟堡湾(英吉利海峡)潮下人工硬质生境底栖生物群落的多样性和结构。","authors":"Bastien Taormina, Jean-Charles Leclerc, Anne-Marie Rusig, Maxime Navon, Maël Deloor, Pascal Claquin, Jean-Claude Dauvin","doi":"10.1080/08927014.2024.2419572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To inform the performance of ecological engineering designs for artificial structures at sea, it is essential to characterise their impacts on the epibenthic communities colonising them. In this context, the present study aims to compare the community structure among natural and four different artificial hard habitats with different ages and features installed in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel): <i>i</i>) cinder blocks and <i>ii</i>) boulders, both installed six years prior to the study, and <i>iii</i>) smooth and <i>iv</i>) rugous concrete dykes, both installed one year prior to this study. Results showed that artificial habitats installed six years ago harboured communities with functional and taxonomic diversity characteristic of mature communities but were still different from those of natural habitat. Conversely, the two dyke habitats installed one year prior to this study presented a poorly diversified community dominated by opportunistic taxa. Furthermore, while the concrete used for the two dyke habitats presented different rugosity properties, both habitats supported similar communities, suggesting that such eco-engineering measures did not affect the settlement of early colonisers. Overall, this study highlights the need for long-term monitoring to comprehensively evaluate epibenthic colonisation of artificial structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity and structure of epibenthic communities across subtidal artificial hard habitats in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel).\",\"authors\":\"Bastien Taormina, Jean-Charles Leclerc, Anne-Marie Rusig, Maxime Navon, Maël Deloor, Pascal Claquin, Jean-Claude Dauvin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08927014.2024.2419572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To inform the performance of ecological engineering designs for artificial structures at sea, it is essential to characterise their impacts on the epibenthic communities colonising them. In this context, the present study aims to compare the community structure among natural and four different artificial hard habitats with different ages and features installed in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel): <i>i</i>) cinder blocks and <i>ii</i>) boulders, both installed six years prior to the study, and <i>iii</i>) smooth and <i>iv</i>) rugous concrete dykes, both installed one year prior to this study. Results showed that artificial habitats installed six years ago harboured communities with functional and taxonomic diversity characteristic of mature communities but were still different from those of natural habitat. Conversely, the two dyke habitats installed one year prior to this study presented a poorly diversified community dominated by opportunistic taxa. Furthermore, while the concrete used for the two dyke habitats presented different rugosity properties, both habitats supported similar communities, suggesting that such eco-engineering measures did not affect the settlement of early colonisers. Overall, this study highlights the need for long-term monitoring to comprehensively evaluate epibenthic colonisation of artificial structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2024.2419572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2024.2419572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diversity and structure of epibenthic communities across subtidal artificial hard habitats in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel).
To inform the performance of ecological engineering designs for artificial structures at sea, it is essential to characterise their impacts on the epibenthic communities colonising them. In this context, the present study aims to compare the community structure among natural and four different artificial hard habitats with different ages and features installed in the Bay of Cherbourg (English Channel): i) cinder blocks and ii) boulders, both installed six years prior to the study, and iii) smooth and iv) rugous concrete dykes, both installed one year prior to this study. Results showed that artificial habitats installed six years ago harboured communities with functional and taxonomic diversity characteristic of mature communities but were still different from those of natural habitat. Conversely, the two dyke habitats installed one year prior to this study presented a poorly diversified community dominated by opportunistic taxa. Furthermore, while the concrete used for the two dyke habitats presented different rugosity properties, both habitats supported similar communities, suggesting that such eco-engineering measures did not affect the settlement of early colonisers. Overall, this study highlights the need for long-term monitoring to comprehensively evaluate epibenthic colonisation of artificial structures.