持续性生殖器唤醒障碍的治疗:范围综述。

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2024.2402159
Kimberly Magana, Haley Howard, Kyle Fitzgerald, Christian Hemmerich, Corey Babb, Matt Vassar
{"title":"持续性生殖器唤醒障碍的治疗:范围综述。","authors":"Kimberly Magana, Haley Howard, Kyle Fitzgerald, Christian Hemmerich, Corey Babb, Matt Vassar","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2024.2402159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) is a rare condition characterized by unwanted and distressing symptoms of arousal and dysesthesia. The aim of this scoping review was to map the current state of PGAD management, identify gaps in the literature, and understand patient perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a scoping review following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses Scoping Reviews extension. A systematic literature search for articles pertaining to PGAD/genito-pelvic dysesthesia (GPD) was conducted in August 2023 via Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search returns were deduplicated and the remaining titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion. General publication characteristics and treatment data were extracted from the included publications via a pilot-tested Google form. All screening and extraction were completed in a masked, duplicate fashion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from our scoping review revealed a scarcity of systematic research, limited evidence-based data, and the importance of addressing both physical and psychiatric concerns. Our sample included 46 publications from an initial pool of 636 returns. Case studies were the most common study design. Thirty-three studies examined medication, either alone or as part of a treatment regimen. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most used medication, followed by pramipexole and carbamazepine. Seven studies used a surgical or procedural intervention. Treatment with pelvic floor Botox was the most common procedure. Patient perspectives in the included case studies highlighted themes of shame, suicidal ideation, social isolation, decreased sleep, and overall decline in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from our study emphasize patients' distressing and psychiatric symptoms, indicating a need to improve treatment regimens, using both evidence-based research outcomes and patient-reported outcomes. Management for PGAD/GPD lacks a standardized framework, indicating a need for further research and the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"37 6","pages":"970-975"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment in persistent genital arousal disorder: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Magana, Haley Howard, Kyle Fitzgerald, Christian Hemmerich, Corey Babb, Matt Vassar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2024.2402159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) is a rare condition characterized by unwanted and distressing symptoms of arousal and dysesthesia. The aim of this scoping review was to map the current state of PGAD management, identify gaps in the literature, and understand patient perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a scoping review following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses Scoping Reviews extension. A systematic literature search for articles pertaining to PGAD/genito-pelvic dysesthesia (GPD) was conducted in August 2023 via Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search returns were deduplicated and the remaining titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion. General publication characteristics and treatment data were extracted from the included publications via a pilot-tested Google form. All screening and extraction were completed in a masked, duplicate fashion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from our scoping review revealed a scarcity of systematic research, limited evidence-based data, and the importance of addressing both physical and psychiatric concerns. Our sample included 46 publications from an initial pool of 636 returns. Case studies were the most common study design. Thirty-three studies examined medication, either alone or as part of a treatment regimen. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most used medication, followed by pramipexole and carbamazepine. Seven studies used a surgical or procedural intervention. Treatment with pelvic floor Botox was the most common procedure. Patient perspectives in the included case studies highlighted themes of shame, suicidal ideation, social isolation, decreased sleep, and overall decline in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from our study emphasize patients' distressing and psychiatric symptoms, indicating a need to improve treatment regimens, using both evidence-based research outcomes and patient-reported outcomes. Management for PGAD/GPD lacks a standardized framework, indicating a need for further research and the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"970-975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2402159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2402159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续性生殖器唤醒障碍(PGAD)是一种罕见的疾病,其特征是令人不快和痛苦的唤醒和感觉障碍症状。本范围综述旨在了解 PGAD 的管理现状,找出文献中的不足之处,并了解患者的观点:我们按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的指导方针和《系统性综述和元分析范围界定综述的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses Scoping Reviews)扩展指南完成了范围界定综述。2023 年 8 月,我们通过 Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science 对有关 PGAD/骨盆运动障碍(GPD)的文章进行了系统性文献检索。对检索结果进行了重复处理,并对剩余的标题和摘要进行了筛选。通过试验性测试的谷歌表格从纳入的出版物中提取出版物的一般特征和治疗数据。所有筛选和提取工作都是在蒙面、重复的情况下完成的:我们的范围界定审查结果表明,系统性研究稀缺、循证数据有限,以及同时解决生理和精神问题的重要性。我们的样本从最初的 636 份回复中选取了 46 份出版物。病例研究是最常见的研究设计。有 33 项研究对药物进行了研究,包括单独用药或作为治疗方案的一部分用药。使用最多的药物是选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂,其次是普拉克索和卡马西平。七项研究使用了手术或程序干预。盆底肉毒杆菌毒素是最常见的治疗方法。在纳入的病例研究中,患者的观点突出了羞耻感、自杀意念、社会隔离、睡眠减少和生活质量整体下降等主题:我们的研究结果强调了患者的痛苦和精神症状,表明有必要利用循证研究结果和患者报告结果来改进治疗方案。PGAD/GPD的管理缺乏标准化框架,这表明需要进一步研究和制定临床实践指南,以改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment in persistent genital arousal disorder: a scoping review.

Background: Persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) is a rare condition characterized by unwanted and distressing symptoms of arousal and dysesthesia. The aim of this scoping review was to map the current state of PGAD management, identify gaps in the literature, and understand patient perspectives.

Methods: We completed a scoping review following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses Scoping Reviews extension. A systematic literature search for articles pertaining to PGAD/genito-pelvic dysesthesia (GPD) was conducted in August 2023 via Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search returns were deduplicated and the remaining titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion. General publication characteristics and treatment data were extracted from the included publications via a pilot-tested Google form. All screening and extraction were completed in a masked, duplicate fashion.

Results: Findings from our scoping review revealed a scarcity of systematic research, limited evidence-based data, and the importance of addressing both physical and psychiatric concerns. Our sample included 46 publications from an initial pool of 636 returns. Case studies were the most common study design. Thirty-three studies examined medication, either alone or as part of a treatment regimen. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most used medication, followed by pramipexole and carbamazepine. Seven studies used a surgical or procedural intervention. Treatment with pelvic floor Botox was the most common procedure. Patient perspectives in the included case studies highlighted themes of shame, suicidal ideation, social isolation, decreased sleep, and overall decline in quality of life.

Conclusion: The findings from our study emphasize patients' distressing and psychiatric symptoms, indicating a need to improve treatment regimens, using both evidence-based research outcomes and patient-reported outcomes. Management for PGAD/GPD lacks a standardized framework, indicating a need for further research and the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信