含前列腺素 E1 的海绵体内注射药物引起的疼痛与根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复不良有关。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Michael West, Billy H Cordon, Yanira Ortega, Joseph Narus, John P Mulhall
{"title":"含前列腺素 E1 的海绵体内注射药物引起的疼痛与根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复不良有关。","authors":"Michael West, Billy H Cordon, Yanira Ortega, Joseph Narus, John P Mulhall","doi":"10.1111/andr.13784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracavernosal injection therapy is often used as second-line therapy for erectile dysfunction associated with radical prostatectomy when therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors has failed, but prostaglandin E1-containing vasoactive agents are associated with penile pain in some men.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To define the incidence of pain with prostaglandin E1-containing intracavernosal injection mixtures for erectile dysfunction associated with radical prostatectomy when therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors has failed, and whether pain was a predictor of erectile function recovery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Men who underwent radical prostatectomy and were commenced on intracavernosal injection within 12 months of radical prostatectomy were included. A pain visual analog scale (0-10) was used to assess the degree of pain. Erectile function recovery was defined as the International Index of Erectile Function domain score ≥24 using phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 566 patients, mean age was 58 ± 14 (42-74) years. Duration post-radical prostatectomy at intracavernosal injection training was 3.5 ± 3.5 m. Nerve sparing status: bilateral 76%, unilateral 13%, and non-nerve sparing 11%. Incidence of pain with intracavernosal injection per nerve sparing status: bilateral 10% of patients, unilateral 32%, non-nerve sparing 92% (p < 0.001). Median visual analog scale in those experiencing pain: bilateral 4 (interquartile range 3, 5), unilateral 5.5 (interquartile range 3, 6), non-nerve sparing 7 (interquartile range 3, 9) (p < 0.001). Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors success at 24 months (no pain vs. pain): bilateral 70% vs. 40% (p < 0.001), unilateral 50% vs. 28% (p < 0.001), non-nerve sparing 10% vs. 0% (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, predictors of failure to respond to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months post-radical prostatectomy included baseline erectile function, increasing age, incomplete nerve-sparing surgery, and presence of pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The presence of penile pain with intracavernosal injection is associated with poorer erectile function recovery post-radical prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incidence of pain is high in men with non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy; older patient age, poorer nerve sparing, poor baseline erectile function, and the presence of penile pain with prostaglandin E1-containing intracavernosal injection medication, were predictive of poor erectile function recovery using phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain associated with prostaglandin E<sub>1</sub>-containing intracavernosal injection medication is associated with poor erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Michael West, Billy H Cordon, Yanira Ortega, Joseph Narus, John P Mulhall\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/andr.13784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracavernosal injection therapy is often used as second-line therapy for erectile dysfunction associated with radical prostatectomy when therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors has failed, but prostaglandin E1-containing vasoactive agents are associated with penile pain in some men.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To define the incidence of pain with prostaglandin E1-containing intracavernosal injection mixtures for erectile dysfunction associated with radical prostatectomy when therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors has failed, and whether pain was a predictor of erectile function recovery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Men who underwent radical prostatectomy and were commenced on intracavernosal injection within 12 months of radical prostatectomy were included. A pain visual analog scale (0-10) was used to assess the degree of pain. Erectile function recovery was defined as the International Index of Erectile Function domain score ≥24 using phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 566 patients, mean age was 58 ± 14 (42-74) years. Duration post-radical prostatectomy at intracavernosal injection training was 3.5 ± 3.5 m. Nerve sparing status: bilateral 76%, unilateral 13%, and non-nerve sparing 11%. Incidence of pain with intracavernosal injection per nerve sparing status: bilateral 10% of patients, unilateral 32%, non-nerve sparing 92% (p < 0.001). Median visual analog scale in those experiencing pain: bilateral 4 (interquartile range 3, 5), unilateral 5.5 (interquartile range 3, 6), non-nerve sparing 7 (interquartile range 3, 9) (p < 0.001). Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors success at 24 months (no pain vs. pain): bilateral 70% vs. 40% (p < 0.001), unilateral 50% vs. 28% (p < 0.001), non-nerve sparing 10% vs. 0% (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, predictors of failure to respond to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months post-radical prostatectomy included baseline erectile function, increasing age, incomplete nerve-sparing surgery, and presence of pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The presence of penile pain with intracavernosal injection is associated with poorer erectile function recovery post-radical prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incidence of pain is high in men with non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy; older patient age, poorer nerve sparing, poor baseline erectile function, and the presence of penile pain with prostaglandin E1-containing intracavernosal injection medication, were predictive of poor erectile function recovery using phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13784\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13784","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂治疗失败时,阴茎海绵体内注射疗法通常被用作根治性前列腺切除术相关勃起功能障碍的二线疗法,但含前列腺素E1的血管活性药物在一些男性中与阴茎疼痛有关:目的:明确在使用磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂治疗失败的情况下,使用含前列腺素E1的阴茎海绵体内注射混合物治疗根治性前列腺切除术相关的勃起功能障碍时疼痛的发生率,以及疼痛是否是勃起功能恢复的预测因素:纳入接受前列腺癌根治术并在术后12个月内开始接受海绵体内注射的男性。采用疼痛视觉模拟量表(0-10)评估疼痛程度。使用磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂24个月后,勃起功能恢复定义为国际勃起功能指数领域评分≥24分:研究共纳入 566 名患者,平均年龄为 58 ± 14 (42-74) 岁。前列腺根治术后进行海绵体内注射训练的时间为 3.5 ± 3.5 m。神经疏通状态:双侧 76%,单侧 13%,非神经疏通 11%。每种神经疏通状态下阴茎海绵体内注射疼痛的发生率:双侧 10%,单侧 32%,非神经疏通 92% (P 讨论):阴茎海绵体内注射疼痛与根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复较差有关:结论:在接受非神经疏通根治性前列腺切除术的男性中,疼痛的发生率很高;患者年龄较大、神经疏通较差、基线勃起功能较差,以及在使用含前列腺素E1的阴茎海绵体内注射药物时出现阴茎疼痛,是使用磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂24个月时勃起功能恢复较差的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain associated with prostaglandin E1-containing intracavernosal injection medication is associated with poor erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy.

Background: Intracavernosal injection therapy is often used as second-line therapy for erectile dysfunction associated with radical prostatectomy when therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors has failed, but prostaglandin E1-containing vasoactive agents are associated with penile pain in some men.

Objectives: To define the incidence of pain with prostaglandin E1-containing intracavernosal injection mixtures for erectile dysfunction associated with radical prostatectomy when therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors has failed, and whether pain was a predictor of erectile function recovery.

Materials and methods: Men who underwent radical prostatectomy and were commenced on intracavernosal injection within 12 months of radical prostatectomy were included. A pain visual analog scale (0-10) was used to assess the degree of pain. Erectile function recovery was defined as the International Index of Erectile Function domain score ≥24 using phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months.

Results: The study included 566 patients, mean age was 58 ± 14 (42-74) years. Duration post-radical prostatectomy at intracavernosal injection training was 3.5 ± 3.5 m. Nerve sparing status: bilateral 76%, unilateral 13%, and non-nerve sparing 11%. Incidence of pain with intracavernosal injection per nerve sparing status: bilateral 10% of patients, unilateral 32%, non-nerve sparing 92% (p < 0.001). Median visual analog scale in those experiencing pain: bilateral 4 (interquartile range 3, 5), unilateral 5.5 (interquartile range 3, 6), non-nerve sparing 7 (interquartile range 3, 9) (p < 0.001). Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors success at 24 months (no pain vs. pain): bilateral 70% vs. 40% (p < 0.001), unilateral 50% vs. 28% (p < 0.001), non-nerve sparing 10% vs. 0% (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, predictors of failure to respond to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months post-radical prostatectomy included baseline erectile function, increasing age, incomplete nerve-sparing surgery, and presence of pain.

Discussion: The presence of penile pain with intracavernosal injection is associated with poorer erectile function recovery post-radical prostatectomy.

Conclusions: Incidence of pain is high in men with non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy; older patient age, poorer nerve sparing, poor baseline erectile function, and the presence of penile pain with prostaglandin E1-containing intracavernosal injection medication, were predictive of poor erectile function recovery using phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors at 24 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信