鳄鱼的镇静和全身麻醉:系统综述。

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Asbjørn Onsberg Kruuse, Louise Damholt Markusen, Carsten Grøndahl, Lisbeth Høier Olsen
{"title":"鳄鱼的镇静和全身麻醉:系统综述。","authors":"Asbjørn Onsberg Kruuse, Louise Damholt Markusen, Carsten Grøndahl, Lisbeth Høier Olsen","doi":"10.1186/s13028-024-00779-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians pose unique challenges due to their aggressive nature, poikilothermic physiology, and specific anatomical and physiological characteristics, all factors that complicate crocodilian anaesthesia. This review aimed to systematically review the literature regarding sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians with focus on efficacy and impact on vital parameters. A systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on May 2, 2023 in the databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Publications were excluded based on predefined exclusion criteria, which encompassed non-standard publications and publications unrelated to crocodilians, with fewer than five animals and/or with insufficient data on sedation and general anaesthesia. Five key factors were used to evaluate the strength of evidence: number of included animals, study design, definition of recovery time, blinded assessment of recovery and conflict of interest. Ten publications were included in this systematic review. Drugs used included alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonists, dissociative anaesthetics, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blocking agents, propofol, alfaxalone, and inhalant gasses. The studies included in total 55 Alligator mississippiensis, 110 Crocodylus porosus, 15 Crocodylus johnstoni, and 15 Crocodylus niloticus. Factors such as temperature, administration route, dose, species, and age influenced protocols for sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians. The studies included used five different study designs. Only one study included a control group, done on retrospectively collected data. Blinded recovery assessments and declarations of no conflict of interest were noted in some studies. The use of four distinct recovery definitions posed challenges to comparability in this systematic review. The studies reported that medetomidine provided stable and reversible sedation, although it depressed heart rate. Alfaxalone was less stable outside the optimal temperature range. Intubation and inhalation anaesthesia were effective, and adrenaline reduced the length of the recovery period. Overall, the review provides valuable insights for veterinarians, researchers, and wildlife professionals involved in sedation and general anaesthesia of the crocodilian species, however, the literature is limited, and further research is needed to improve evidence-based medical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7181,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","volume":"66 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Asbjørn Onsberg Kruuse, Louise Damholt Markusen, Carsten Grøndahl, Lisbeth Høier Olsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13028-024-00779-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians pose unique challenges due to their aggressive nature, poikilothermic physiology, and specific anatomical and physiological characteristics, all factors that complicate crocodilian anaesthesia. This review aimed to systematically review the literature regarding sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians with focus on efficacy and impact on vital parameters. A systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on May 2, 2023 in the databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Publications were excluded based on predefined exclusion criteria, which encompassed non-standard publications and publications unrelated to crocodilians, with fewer than five animals and/or with insufficient data on sedation and general anaesthesia. Five key factors were used to evaluate the strength of evidence: number of included animals, study design, definition of recovery time, blinded assessment of recovery and conflict of interest. Ten publications were included in this systematic review. Drugs used included alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonists, dissociative anaesthetics, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blocking agents, propofol, alfaxalone, and inhalant gasses. The studies included in total 55 Alligator mississippiensis, 110 Crocodylus porosus, 15 Crocodylus johnstoni, and 15 Crocodylus niloticus. Factors such as temperature, administration route, dose, species, and age influenced protocols for sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians. The studies included used five different study designs. Only one study included a control group, done on retrospectively collected data. Blinded recovery assessments and declarations of no conflict of interest were noted in some studies. The use of four distinct recovery definitions posed challenges to comparability in this systematic review. The studies reported that medetomidine provided stable and reversible sedation, although it depressed heart rate. Alfaxalone was less stable outside the optimal temperature range. Intubation and inhalation anaesthesia were effective, and adrenaline reduced the length of the recovery period. Overall, the review provides valuable insights for veterinarians, researchers, and wildlife professionals involved in sedation and general anaesthesia of the crocodilian species, however, the literature is limited, and further research is needed to improve evidence-based medical management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00779-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00779-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鳄鱼具有攻击性、低体温生理以及特殊的解剖和生理特征,所有这些因素都使鳄鱼麻醉复杂化,因此对鳄鱼进行镇静和全身麻醉是一项独特的挑战。本综述旨在系统回顾有关鳄鱼镇静和全身麻醉的文献,重点关注疗效和对生命参数的影响。2023 年 5 月 2 日,根据 PRISMA 指南在 Embase、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 等数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。根据预先确定的排除标准,排除了非标准出版物、与鳄鱼无关的出版物、动物数量少于五只和/或镇静与全身麻醉数据不足的出版物。评估证据强度的五个关键因素是:纳入动物的数量、研究设计、恢复时间的定义、恢复情况的盲法评估和利益冲突。本系统综述共收录了十篇文献。使用的药物包括α-2-肾上腺素受体激动剂、解离性麻醉剂、苯二氮卓、神经肌肉阻断剂、异丙酚、阿法沙隆和吸入性毒气。这些研究共包括 55 条密西西比短吻鳄、110 条鳄鱼、15 条约翰斯顿鳄鱼和 15 条尼罗河鳄鱼。温度、给药途径、剂量、物种和年龄等因素影响着鳄鱼的镇静和全身麻醉方案。所纳入的研究采用了五种不同的研究设计。只有一项研究包括对照组,是根据回顾性收集的数据进行的。一些研究注意到了盲法恢复评估和无利益冲突声明。四种不同的恢复定义给本系统综述的可比性带来了挑战。研究报告称,虽然美托咪定会抑制心率,但它能提供稳定且可逆的镇静效果。阿法沙龙在最佳温度范围外的稳定性较差。插管和吸入麻醉有效,肾上腺素缩短了恢复期。总之,该综述为从事鳄鱼镇静和全身麻醉的兽医、研究人员和野生动物专业人员提供了宝贵的见解,但文献有限,需要进一步研究以改进循证医疗管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians: a systematic review.

Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians pose unique challenges due to their aggressive nature, poikilothermic physiology, and specific anatomical and physiological characteristics, all factors that complicate crocodilian anaesthesia. This review aimed to systematically review the literature regarding sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians with focus on efficacy and impact on vital parameters. A systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on May 2, 2023 in the databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Publications were excluded based on predefined exclusion criteria, which encompassed non-standard publications and publications unrelated to crocodilians, with fewer than five animals and/or with insufficient data on sedation and general anaesthesia. Five key factors were used to evaluate the strength of evidence: number of included animals, study design, definition of recovery time, blinded assessment of recovery and conflict of interest. Ten publications were included in this systematic review. Drugs used included alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonists, dissociative anaesthetics, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blocking agents, propofol, alfaxalone, and inhalant gasses. The studies included in total 55 Alligator mississippiensis, 110 Crocodylus porosus, 15 Crocodylus johnstoni, and 15 Crocodylus niloticus. Factors such as temperature, administration route, dose, species, and age influenced protocols for sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians. The studies included used five different study designs. Only one study included a control group, done on retrospectively collected data. Blinded recovery assessments and declarations of no conflict of interest were noted in some studies. The use of four distinct recovery definitions posed challenges to comparability in this systematic review. The studies reported that medetomidine provided stable and reversible sedation, although it depressed heart rate. Alfaxalone was less stable outside the optimal temperature range. Intubation and inhalation anaesthesia were effective, and adrenaline reduced the length of the recovery period. Overall, the review provides valuable insights for veterinarians, researchers, and wildlife professionals involved in sedation and general anaesthesia of the crocodilian species, however, the literature is limited, and further research is needed to improve evidence-based medical management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica is an open access journal encompassing all aspects of veterinary research and medicine of domestic and wild animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信