Yiannis Kiouvrekis, Sotiris Zikas, Ilias Katis, Ioannis Tsilikas, Ioannis Filippopoulos
{"title":"利用高斯过程空间模型开发电磁污染地图。","authors":"Yiannis Kiouvrekis, Sotiris Zikas, Ilias Katis, Ioannis Tsilikas, Ioannis Filippopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid proliferation of wireless technologies in everyday environments demands the quick and precise estimation of electromagnetic field distribution. This distribution is commonly depicted through the electric field strength across various geographical areas. The objective of this research is to determine the most effective geospatial model for generating a national-level electric field strength map within the 30 MHz-6 GHz frequency range. To achieve this, we employed five different methodologies for constructing the electric field strength map. Four of these methodologies are based on Gaussian process regression, while the fifth utilizes the classical weighted-average method of the nearest neighbor. Our study focused on a country with a total area of 9251 km<sup>2</sup>, using a dataset comprising 3621 measurements. The findings reveal that Gaussian process spatial models, also known as Kriging models, generally outperform other methods when applied to spatial data. However, it was observed that, after excluding some outlier data points, the performance of the classical nearest neighbor models becomes comparable to that of the Gaussian process models. This indicates the potential for both approaches to be effective, depending on the data quality and the presence of outliers.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"955 ","pages":"176907"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of electromagnetic pollution maps utilizing Gaussian process spatial models.\",\"authors\":\"Yiannis Kiouvrekis, Sotiris Zikas, Ilias Katis, Ioannis Tsilikas, Ioannis Filippopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rapid proliferation of wireless technologies in everyday environments demands the quick and precise estimation of electromagnetic field distribution. This distribution is commonly depicted through the electric field strength across various geographical areas. The objective of this research is to determine the most effective geospatial model for generating a national-level electric field strength map within the 30 MHz-6 GHz frequency range. To achieve this, we employed five different methodologies for constructing the electric field strength map. Four of these methodologies are based on Gaussian process regression, while the fifth utilizes the classical weighted-average method of the nearest neighbor. Our study focused on a country with a total area of 9251 km<sup>2</sup>, using a dataset comprising 3621 measurements. The findings reveal that Gaussian process spatial models, also known as Kriging models, generally outperform other methods when applied to spatial data. However, it was observed that, after excluding some outlier data points, the performance of the classical nearest neighbor models becomes comparable to that of the Gaussian process models. This indicates the potential for both approaches to be effective, depending on the data quality and the presence of outliers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"955 \",\"pages\":\"176907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176907\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176907","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of electromagnetic pollution maps utilizing Gaussian process spatial models.
The rapid proliferation of wireless technologies in everyday environments demands the quick and precise estimation of electromagnetic field distribution. This distribution is commonly depicted through the electric field strength across various geographical areas. The objective of this research is to determine the most effective geospatial model for generating a national-level electric field strength map within the 30 MHz-6 GHz frequency range. To achieve this, we employed five different methodologies for constructing the electric field strength map. Four of these methodologies are based on Gaussian process regression, while the fifth utilizes the classical weighted-average method of the nearest neighbor. Our study focused on a country with a total area of 9251 km2, using a dataset comprising 3621 measurements. The findings reveal that Gaussian process spatial models, also known as Kriging models, generally outperform other methods when applied to spatial data. However, it was observed that, after excluding some outlier data points, the performance of the classical nearest neighbor models becomes comparable to that of the Gaussian process models. This indicates the potential for both approaches to be effective, depending on the data quality and the presence of outliers.
期刊介绍:
The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere.
The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.