利用ctDNA机器学习模型预测无法手术的局部NSCLC患者的病情进展

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70316
Yuqi Wu, Canjun Li, Yin Yang, Tao Zhang, Jianyang Wang, Wanxiangfu Tang, Ningyou Li, Hua Bao, Xin Wang, Nan Bi
{"title":"利用ctDNA机器学习模型预测无法手术的局部NSCLC患者的病情进展","authors":"Yuqi Wu,&nbsp;Canjun Li,&nbsp;Yin Yang,&nbsp;Tao Zhang,&nbsp;Jianyang Wang,&nbsp;Wanxiangfu Tang,&nbsp;Ningyou Li,&nbsp;Hua Bao,&nbsp;Xin Wang,&nbsp;Nan Bi","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>There is an urgent clinical need to accurately predict the risk for disease progression in post-treatment NSCLC patients, yet current ctDNA mutation profiling approaches are limited by low sensitivity. We represent a non-invasive liquid biopsy assay utilizing cfDNA neomer profiling for predicting disease progression in 44 inoperable localized NSCLC patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 97 plasma samples were collected at various time points during or post-treatments (TP1: 39, TP2: 33, TP3: 25). cfDNA neomer profiling, generated based on target sequencing data, was used to fit survival support vector machine models for each time point. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) was performed to evaluate the models' predictive performances.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our cfDNA neomer profiling assay showed excellent performance in detecting patients with a high risk for disease progression. At TP1, the high-risk patients detected by our model showed an increased risk of 3.62 times (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.62, <i>p</i> = 0.0026) for disease progression, compared to 3.91 times (HR = 3.91, <i>p</i> = 0.0022) and 4.00 times (HR = 4.00, <i>p</i> = 0.019) for TP2 and TP3. These neomer profiling determined HRs were higher than the ctDNA mutation-based results (HR = 2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.074; HR = 1.49, <i>p</i>&amp;amp;#x02009;=&amp;amp;#x02009;0.61) at TP1 and TP3. At TP1, the predictive model reached 40% sensitivity at 92.9% specificity, outperforming the mutation-based method (40% sensitivity at 78.6% specificity), while the combination results reached a higher sensitivity (60%). Finally, the longitudinal analysis showed that the combination of neomer and ctDNA mutation-based results could predict disease progression with an excellent sensitivity of 88.9% at 80% specificity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In conclusion, we developed a cfDNA neomer profiling assay for predicting disease progression in inoperable NSCLC patients. This assay showed increased predicting power during and post-treatment compared to the ctDNA mutation-based method, thus illustrating a great clinical potential to guide treatment decisions in inoperable NSCLC patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04014465</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"13 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Disease Progression in Inoperable Localized NSCLC Patients Using ctDNA Machine Learning Model\",\"authors\":\"Yuqi Wu,&nbsp;Canjun Li,&nbsp;Yin Yang,&nbsp;Tao Zhang,&nbsp;Jianyang Wang,&nbsp;Wanxiangfu Tang,&nbsp;Ningyou Li,&nbsp;Hua Bao,&nbsp;Xin Wang,&nbsp;Nan Bi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is an urgent clinical need to accurately predict the risk for disease progression in post-treatment NSCLC patients, yet current ctDNA mutation profiling approaches are limited by low sensitivity. We represent a non-invasive liquid biopsy assay utilizing cfDNA neomer profiling for predicting disease progression in 44 inoperable localized NSCLC patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 97 plasma samples were collected at various time points during or post-treatments (TP1: 39, TP2: 33, TP3: 25). cfDNA neomer profiling, generated based on target sequencing data, was used to fit survival support vector machine models for each time point. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) was performed to evaluate the models' predictive performances.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our cfDNA neomer profiling assay showed excellent performance in detecting patients with a high risk for disease progression. At TP1, the high-risk patients detected by our model showed an increased risk of 3.62 times (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.62, <i>p</i> = 0.0026) for disease progression, compared to 3.91 times (HR = 3.91, <i>p</i> = 0.0022) and 4.00 times (HR = 4.00, <i>p</i> = 0.019) for TP2 and TP3. These neomer profiling determined HRs were higher than the ctDNA mutation-based results (HR = 2.08, <i>p</i> = 0.074; HR = 1.49, <i>p</i>&amp;amp;#x02009;=&amp;amp;#x02009;0.61) at TP1 and TP3. At TP1, the predictive model reached 40% sensitivity at 92.9% specificity, outperforming the mutation-based method (40% sensitivity at 78.6% specificity), while the combination results reached a higher sensitivity (60%). Finally, the longitudinal analysis showed that the combination of neomer and ctDNA mutation-based results could predict disease progression with an excellent sensitivity of 88.9% at 80% specificity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In conclusion, we developed a cfDNA neomer profiling assay for predicting disease progression in inoperable NSCLC patients. This assay showed increased predicting power during and post-treatment compared to the ctDNA mutation-based method, thus illustrating a great clinical potential to guide treatment decisions in inoperable NSCLC patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04014465</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499892/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70316\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:临床上迫切需要准确预测NSCLC患者治疗后疾病进展的风险,但目前的ctDNA突变分析方法因灵敏度低而受到限制。我们展示了一种非侵入性液体活检检测方法,利用 cfDNA 新基因图谱预测 44 例无法手术的局部 NSCLC 患者的疾病进展:在治疗期间或治疗后的不同时间点(TP1:39,TP2:33,TP3:25)共收集了97份血浆样本。基于靶测序数据生成的cfDNA新体谱用于拟合每个时间点的生存支持向量机模型。对模型的预测性能进行了留空交叉验证(LOOCV):结果:我们的 cfDNA 新体谱分析方法在检测疾病进展高风险患者方面表现出色。在TP1,我们的模型检测出的高危患者的疾病进展风险增加了3.62倍(危险比[HR] = 3.62,p = 0.0026),而TP2和TP3分别增加了3.91倍(HR = 3.91,p = 0.0022)和4.00倍(HR = 4.00,p = 0.019)。在TP1和TP3,这些新体图谱确定的HR高于基于ctDNA突变的结果(HR = 2.08,p = 0.074;HR = 1.49,p&#x02009;=&#x02009;0.61)。在 TP1,预测模型的灵敏度为 40%,特异性为 92.9%,优于基于突变的方法(灵敏度为 40%,特异性为 78.6%),而组合结果的灵敏度更高(60%)。最后,纵向分析表明,基于新体和ctDNA突变的组合结果可以预测疾病进展,灵敏度高达88.9%,特异性为80%:总之,我们开发了一种用于预测无法手术的NSCLC患者疾病进展的cfDNA新体谱分析方法。与基于ctDNA突变的方法相比,这种检测方法在治疗过程中和治疗后都显示出更强的预测能力,因此在指导无法手术的NSCLC患者的治疗决策方面具有巨大的临床潜力:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04014465。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predicting Disease Progression in Inoperable Localized NSCLC Patients Using ctDNA Machine Learning Model

Predicting Disease Progression in Inoperable Localized NSCLC Patients Using ctDNA Machine Learning Model

Introduction

There is an urgent clinical need to accurately predict the risk for disease progression in post-treatment NSCLC patients, yet current ctDNA mutation profiling approaches are limited by low sensitivity. We represent a non-invasive liquid biopsy assay utilizing cfDNA neomer profiling for predicting disease progression in 44 inoperable localized NSCLC patients.

Methods

A total of 97 plasma samples were collected at various time points during or post-treatments (TP1: 39, TP2: 33, TP3: 25). cfDNA neomer profiling, generated based on target sequencing data, was used to fit survival support vector machine models for each time point. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) was performed to evaluate the models' predictive performances.

Results

Our cfDNA neomer profiling assay showed excellent performance in detecting patients with a high risk for disease progression. At TP1, the high-risk patients detected by our model showed an increased risk of 3.62 times (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.62, p = 0.0026) for disease progression, compared to 3.91 times (HR = 3.91, p = 0.0022) and 4.00 times (HR = 4.00, p = 0.019) for TP2 and TP3. These neomer profiling determined HRs were higher than the ctDNA mutation-based results (HR = 2.08, p = 0.074; HR = 1.49, p&amp;#x02009;=&amp;#x02009;0.61) at TP1 and TP3. At TP1, the predictive model reached 40% sensitivity at 92.9% specificity, outperforming the mutation-based method (40% sensitivity at 78.6% specificity), while the combination results reached a higher sensitivity (60%). Finally, the longitudinal analysis showed that the combination of neomer and ctDNA mutation-based results could predict disease progression with an excellent sensitivity of 88.9% at 80% specificity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we developed a cfDNA neomer profiling assay for predicting disease progression in inoperable NSCLC patients. This assay showed increased predicting power during and post-treatment compared to the ctDNA mutation-based method, thus illustrating a great clinical potential to guide treatment decisions in inoperable NSCLC patients.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04014465

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信