生态系统碳氮循环相互作用的经验证据和理论认识

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
New Phytologist Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1111/nph.20178
Benjamin D. Stocker, Ning Dong, Evan A. Perkowski, Pascal D. Schneider, Huiying Xu, Hugo J. de Boer, Karin T. Rebel, Nicholas G. Smith, Kevin Van Sundert, Han Wang, Sarah E. Jones, I. Colin Prentice, Sandy P. Harrison
{"title":"生态系统碳氮循环相互作用的经验证据和理论认识","authors":"Benjamin D. Stocker, Ning Dong, Evan A. Perkowski, Pascal D. Schneider, Huiying Xu, Hugo J. de Boer, Karin T. Rebel, Nicholas G. Smith, Kevin Van Sundert, Han Wang, Sarah E. Jones, I. Colin Prentice, Sandy P. Harrison","doi":"10.1111/nph.20178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interactions between carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles in terrestrial ecosystems are simulated in advanced vegetation models, yet methodologies vary widely, leading to divergent simulations of past land C balance trends. This underscores the need to reassess our understanding of ecosystem processes, given recent theoretical advancements and empirical data. We review current knowledge, emphasising evidence from experiments and trait data compilations for vegetation responses to CO<sub>2</sub> and N input, alongside theoretical and ecological principles for modelling. N fertilisation increases leaf N content but inconsistently enhances leaf-level photosynthetic capacity. Whole-plant responses include increased leaf area and biomass, with reduced root allocation and increased aboveground biomass. Elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> also boosts leaf area and biomass but intensifies belowground allocation, depleting soil N and likely reducing N losses. Global leaf traits data confirm these findings, indicating that soil N availability influences leaf N content more than photosynthetic capacity. A demonstration model based on the functional balance hypothesis accurately predicts responses to N and CO<sub>2</sub> fertilisation on tissue allocation, growth and biomass, offering a path to reduce uncertainty in global C cycle projections.","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical evidence and theoretical understanding of ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycle interactions\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin D. Stocker, Ning Dong, Evan A. Perkowski, Pascal D. Schneider, Huiying Xu, Hugo J. de Boer, Karin T. Rebel, Nicholas G. Smith, Kevin Van Sundert, Han Wang, Sarah E. Jones, I. Colin Prentice, Sandy P. Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nph.20178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interactions between carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles in terrestrial ecosystems are simulated in advanced vegetation models, yet methodologies vary widely, leading to divergent simulations of past land C balance trends. This underscores the need to reassess our understanding of ecosystem processes, given recent theoretical advancements and empirical data. We review current knowledge, emphasising evidence from experiments and trait data compilations for vegetation responses to CO<sub>2</sub> and N input, alongside theoretical and ecological principles for modelling. N fertilisation increases leaf N content but inconsistently enhances leaf-level photosynthetic capacity. Whole-plant responses include increased leaf area and biomass, with reduced root allocation and increased aboveground biomass. Elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> also boosts leaf area and biomass but intensifies belowground allocation, depleting soil N and likely reducing N losses. Global leaf traits data confirm these findings, indicating that soil N availability influences leaf N content more than photosynthetic capacity. A demonstration model based on the functional balance hypothesis accurately predicts responses to N and CO<sub>2</sub> fertilisation on tissue allocation, growth and biomass, offering a path to reduce uncertainty in global C cycle projections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Phytologist\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Phytologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20178\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先进的植被模型模拟了陆地生态系统中碳(C)和氮(N)循环之间的相互作用,但其方法却大相径庭,导致对过去陆地碳平衡趋势的模拟结果各不相同。这突出表明,鉴于最近的理论进展和经验数据,我们有必要重新评估对生态系统过程的理解。我们回顾了当前的知识,强调了植被对二氧化碳和氮输入反应的实验证据和性状数据汇编,以及建模的理论和生态原则。氮肥可增加叶片的氮含量,但对叶片光合作用能力的增强效果并不一致。植物的整体反应包括叶面积和生物量增加,根系分配减少,地上生物量增加。大气中二氧化碳浓度升高也会增加叶面积和生物量,但会加强地下分配,消耗土壤中的氮,并可能减少氮的损失。全球叶片性状数据证实了这些发现,表明土壤氮的可用性对叶片氮含量的影响大于光合作用能力。基于功能平衡假说的示范模型准确预测了氮肥和二氧化碳施肥对组织分配、生长和生物量的影响,为减少全球碳循环预测的不确定性提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical evidence and theoretical understanding of ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycle interactions
Interactions between carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles in terrestrial ecosystems are simulated in advanced vegetation models, yet methodologies vary widely, leading to divergent simulations of past land C balance trends. This underscores the need to reassess our understanding of ecosystem processes, given recent theoretical advancements and empirical data. We review current knowledge, emphasising evidence from experiments and trait data compilations for vegetation responses to CO2 and N input, alongside theoretical and ecological principles for modelling. N fertilisation increases leaf N content but inconsistently enhances leaf-level photosynthetic capacity. Whole-plant responses include increased leaf area and biomass, with reduced root allocation and increased aboveground biomass. Elevated atmospheric CO2 also boosts leaf area and biomass but intensifies belowground allocation, depleting soil N and likely reducing N losses. Global leaf traits data confirm these findings, indicating that soil N availability influences leaf N content more than photosynthetic capacity. A demonstration model based on the functional balance hypothesis accurately predicts responses to N and CO2 fertilisation on tissue allocation, growth and biomass, offering a path to reduce uncertainty in global C cycle projections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信