基于脊柱形态参数的可解释机器学习估计生物年龄

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Zi Xu, Yunsong Peng, Mudan Zhang, Rongpin Wang, Zhenlu Yang
{"title":"基于脊柱形态参数的可解释机器学习估计生物年龄","authors":"Zi Xu, Yunsong Peng, Mudan Zhang, Rongpin Wang, Zhenlu Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11357-024-01394-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurately estimating biological age is beneficial for measuring aging and predicting risk. It is widely accepted that the prevalence of spine compression increases significantly with age. However, biological age based on vertebral morphological data is rarely reported. In this study, a total of 2,364 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were enrolled, and morphological parameters of the spine were collected from lateral radiographs scanned by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The biological age of the spine, called SpineAge, was calculated with the parameters by machine learning models. The SHapley Additive exPlanation was used for better interpreting each parameter's contribution. Besides, an Accelerated Aging Index (AAI) was defined as SpineAge minus chronological age and was used to quantify the accelerating aging degree of the spine. The results indicated that the SpineAge performed better than chronological age did in predicting 2-year and 5-year all-cause mortality. After adjusting all covariates, there was a significant association between AAI and all-cause mortality risk. Specifically, each 1-year increase in AAI was associated with a 25.9% increase in all-cause mortality risk (Hazards ratio, 1.259; 95% CI, 1.087–1.457; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Considering the first quartile of AAI as a reference, the mortality risks for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 2.389 (95% CI, 1.064–5.364; <i>P</i> = 0.035), 5.911 (95% CI, 2.241–15.590; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and 22.925 (95% CI, 4.744–110.769; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) times higher, respectively. Our study developed a novel and highly applicable biological-age predictor for predicting individualized long-term prognosis and facilitating personalized care.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An explainable machine learning estimated biological age based on morphological parameters of the spine\",\"authors\":\"Zi Xu, Yunsong Peng, Mudan Zhang, Rongpin Wang, Zhenlu Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11357-024-01394-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurately estimating biological age is beneficial for measuring aging and predicting risk. It is widely accepted that the prevalence of spine compression increases significantly with age. However, biological age based on vertebral morphological data is rarely reported. In this study, a total of 2,364 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were enrolled, and morphological parameters of the spine were collected from lateral radiographs scanned by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The biological age of the spine, called SpineAge, was calculated with the parameters by machine learning models. The SHapley Additive exPlanation was used for better interpreting each parameter's contribution. Besides, an Accelerated Aging Index (AAI) was defined as SpineAge minus chronological age and was used to quantify the accelerating aging degree of the spine. The results indicated that the SpineAge performed better than chronological age did in predicting 2-year and 5-year all-cause mortality. After adjusting all covariates, there was a significant association between AAI and all-cause mortality risk. Specifically, each 1-year increase in AAI was associated with a 25.9% increase in all-cause mortality risk (Hazards ratio, 1.259; 95% CI, 1.087–1.457; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Considering the first quartile of AAI as a reference, the mortality risks for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 2.389 (95% CI, 1.064–5.364; <i>P</i> = 0.035), 5.911 (95% CI, 2.241–15.590; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and 22.925 (95% CI, 4.744–110.769; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) times higher, respectively. Our study developed a novel and highly applicable biological-age predictor for predicting individualized long-term prognosis and facilitating personalized care.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeroScience\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeroScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01394-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01394-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确估计生理年龄有利于衡量衰老程度和预测风险。人们普遍认为,随着年龄的增长,脊柱受压的患病率会显著增加。然而,基于椎体形态学数据的生理年龄却鲜有报道。在这项研究中,共有 2,364 名来自美国国家健康与营养调查(National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey)的参与者参与了研究,并通过双能 X 射线吸收仪扫描的侧位X光片收集了脊柱的形态学参数。通过机器学习模型利用这些参数计算出脊柱的生物年龄,称为 "脊柱年龄"(SpineAge)。为了更好地解释每个参数的贡献,使用了 SHapley Additive exPlanation。此外,加速老化指数(AAI)被定义为脊柱年龄减去生理年龄,用于量化脊柱的加速老化程度。结果表明,在预测 2 年和 5 年全因死亡率方面,脊柱年龄的表现优于生理年龄。调整所有协变量后,AAI 与全因死亡风险之间存在显著关联。具体来说,AAI 每增加 1 年,全因死亡风险就会增加 25.9%(危险比,1.259;95% CI,1.087-1.457;P <;0.001)。以 AAI 的第一四分位数为参照,第二、第三和第四四分位数的死亡风险分别高出 2.389 (95% CI, 1.064-5.364; P = 0.035)、5.911 (95% CI, 2.241-15.590; P <0.001)和 22.925 (95% CI, 4.744-110.769; P <0.001)倍。我们的研究为预测个体化长期预后和促进个性化护理开发了一种新颖且高度适用的生物年龄预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An explainable machine learning estimated biological age based on morphological parameters of the spine

An explainable machine learning estimated biological age based on morphological parameters of the spine

Accurately estimating biological age is beneficial for measuring aging and predicting risk. It is widely accepted that the prevalence of spine compression increases significantly with age. However, biological age based on vertebral morphological data is rarely reported. In this study, a total of 2,364 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were enrolled, and morphological parameters of the spine were collected from lateral radiographs scanned by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The biological age of the spine, called SpineAge, was calculated with the parameters by machine learning models. The SHapley Additive exPlanation was used for better interpreting each parameter's contribution. Besides, an Accelerated Aging Index (AAI) was defined as SpineAge minus chronological age and was used to quantify the accelerating aging degree of the spine. The results indicated that the SpineAge performed better than chronological age did in predicting 2-year and 5-year all-cause mortality. After adjusting all covariates, there was a significant association between AAI and all-cause mortality risk. Specifically, each 1-year increase in AAI was associated with a 25.9% increase in all-cause mortality risk (Hazards ratio, 1.259; 95% CI, 1.087–1.457; P < 0.001). Considering the first quartile of AAI as a reference, the mortality risks for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 2.389 (95% CI, 1.064–5.364; P = 0.035), 5.911 (95% CI, 2.241–15.590; P < 0.001) and 22.925 (95% CI, 4.744–110.769; P < 0.001) times higher, respectively. Our study developed a novel and highly applicable biological-age predictor for predicting individualized long-term prognosis and facilitating personalized care.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GeroScience
GeroScience Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信