从本体论角度看高中生机械节能问题的解决

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hyojoon Kim, Sangwoo Ha
{"title":"从本体论角度看高中生机械节能问题的解决","authors":"Hyojoon Kim, Sangwoo Ha","doi":"10.1007/s11165-024-10199-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the ontological perspective in analyzing students’ problem-solving related to mechanical energy conservation. The research involves 18 high school students whose explanations were qualitatively analyzed using an extended ontological framework. Initially, students predominantly employed matter-based predicates and formula-centered representations in the first-step problem-solving. However, in the second step, there was a transition towards process-based predicative expressions and representations, such as reformulating, proportional expressions, symbols, and tables, alongside continued use of matter-based expressions. This phase reflects the students’ conceptual shift toward including the “process” category in their understanding of energy concepts. In the third step, most students demonstrated process-based predicative expressions and representations, emphasizing concepts like “conversion” and “transfer.” This transition indicates a shift from the ontological category of “matter” to “process,” evident in both predicates and representation formats. The findings suggest that understanding students’ concepts through an ontological lens not only enhances teaching and learning physics but also contributes to the integration of ontological concepts into science education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Ontological Perspective on Mechanical Energy Conservation problem-solving in high School Students\",\"authors\":\"Hyojoon Kim, Sangwoo Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11165-024-10199-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study explores the ontological perspective in analyzing students’ problem-solving related to mechanical energy conservation. The research involves 18 high school students whose explanations were qualitatively analyzed using an extended ontological framework. Initially, students predominantly employed matter-based predicates and formula-centered representations in the first-step problem-solving. However, in the second step, there was a transition towards process-based predicative expressions and representations, such as reformulating, proportional expressions, symbols, and tables, alongside continued use of matter-based expressions. This phase reflects the students’ conceptual shift toward including the “process” category in their understanding of energy concepts. In the third step, most students demonstrated process-based predicative expressions and representations, emphasizing concepts like “conversion” and “transfer.” This transition indicates a shift from the ontological category of “matter” to “process,” evident in both predicates and representation formats. The findings suggest that understanding students’ concepts through an ontological lens not only enhances teaching and learning physics but also contributes to the integration of ontological concepts into science education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10199-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10199-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了从本体论角度分析学生解决机械节能相关问题的方法。研究涉及 18 名高中生,采用扩展的本体论框架对他们的解释进行了定性分析。最初,学生在第一步问题解决中主要使用基于物质的谓词和以公式为中心的表述。然而,在第二步中,学生在继续使用基于物质的表达式的同时,开始过渡到基于过程的谓词表达式和表示法,如重整、比例表达式、符号和表格。这一阶段反映了学生在理解能量概念时向 "过程 "范畴的概念转变。在第三步中,大多数学生展示了基于过程的谓词表达式和表示法,强调 "转换 "和 "转移 "等概念。这一转变表明,从 "物质 "本体论范畴到 "过程 "范畴的转变,在谓词和表述形式上都很明显。研究结果表明,从本体论角度理解学生的概念,不仅能提高物理教学效果,还有助于将本体论概念融入科学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An Ontological Perspective on Mechanical Energy Conservation problem-solving in high School Students

An Ontological Perspective on Mechanical Energy Conservation problem-solving in high School Students

This study explores the ontological perspective in analyzing students’ problem-solving related to mechanical energy conservation. The research involves 18 high school students whose explanations were qualitatively analyzed using an extended ontological framework. Initially, students predominantly employed matter-based predicates and formula-centered representations in the first-step problem-solving. However, in the second step, there was a transition towards process-based predicative expressions and representations, such as reformulating, proportional expressions, symbols, and tables, alongside continued use of matter-based expressions. This phase reflects the students’ conceptual shift toward including the “process” category in their understanding of energy concepts. In the third step, most students demonstrated process-based predicative expressions and representations, emphasizing concepts like “conversion” and “transfer.” This transition indicates a shift from the ontological category of “matter” to “process,” evident in both predicates and representation formats. The findings suggest that understanding students’ concepts through an ontological lens not only enhances teaching and learning physics but also contributes to the integration of ontological concepts into science education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science Education
Research in Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: 2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021 2020 Impact Factor: 5.439 Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus 2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership. RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal. You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research: Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know. RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted. The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers. Empircal contributions are: Theoretically or conceptually grounded; Relevant to science education theory and practice; Highlight limitations of the study; and Identify possible future research opportunities. From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks. Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is: No longer than 6000 words, including references. Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability; Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education; Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE. While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信