{"title":"诊断结肠直肠吻合口漏的实验室预测指标。","authors":"M Gordiichuk, S Myasoyedov","doi":"10.15407/exp-oncology.2024.02.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An important concern in oncological coloproctology is colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL), which occurs in 3.5%-21% of patients. Predicting the occurrence of failure based on the results of laboratory markers can be decisive for the treatment of this complication.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To improve the early diagnosis of AL by establishing combinations and threshold values of laboratory markers - predictors of the inflammatory process.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The prospective study, conducted from 2020 to 2023, included 213 rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The inflammatory biomarkers were assessed before surgery and on the 3rd, 5th, and 7th days of the postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AL diagnosed in 25 (11.74%) patients by the grade of severity was as follows: A (radiological) in 7 (3.29%) patients; B (clinical) - 4 (1.88%); C (clinically expressed, peritonitis) - 11 (5.16%), and P (late) - 3 (1.41%) patients. The changes in the laboratory indicators of the inflammatory response such as С-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), the counts of neutrophils (NEU), lymphocytes (LYM), platelets (PLT), and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significant only in B or C AL grades. Among them, only three indicators were identified as significant for predicting AL when assessed 24 h before the onset of this complication, namely LYM (threshold value ≤ 0.97 × 103/mm3, sensitivity 66.7% and specificity 81.3%, p < 0.001); PLT (threshold value > > 257 103/mm3, sensitivity 58.6%, and specificity 86.7%, p < 0.001); and NLR (threshold value > 4.42, sensitivity 58.1%, and specificity 86.7%, p < 0.001). The three-factor model based on these selected indicators was set up, and the prognosis index (Prog) was proposed with the decision threshold Progcrit = 2.23. The sensitivity of the model was 80% (95% CI 51.9%-95.7%), and the specificity - 74.2% (67.6%-80.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the routine laboratory predictors used in the complex diagnosis of AL, B or C AL grades may be predicted allowing for the timely effective early diagnosis, medication, and surgical intervention..</p>","PeriodicalId":94318,"journal":{"name":"Experimental oncology","volume":"46 2","pages":"146-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LABORATORY PREDICTORS FOR DIAGNOSING COLORECTAL ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE.\",\"authors\":\"M Gordiichuk, S Myasoyedov\",\"doi\":\"10.15407/exp-oncology.2024.02.146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An important concern in oncological coloproctology is colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL), which occurs in 3.5%-21% of patients. Predicting the occurrence of failure based on the results of laboratory markers can be decisive for the treatment of this complication.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To improve the early diagnosis of AL by establishing combinations and threshold values of laboratory markers - predictors of the inflammatory process.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The prospective study, conducted from 2020 to 2023, included 213 rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The inflammatory biomarkers were assessed before surgery and on the 3rd, 5th, and 7th days of the postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AL diagnosed in 25 (11.74%) patients by the grade of severity was as follows: A (radiological) in 7 (3.29%) patients; B (clinical) - 4 (1.88%); C (clinically expressed, peritonitis) - 11 (5.16%), and P (late) - 3 (1.41%) patients. The changes in the laboratory indicators of the inflammatory response such as С-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), the counts of neutrophils (NEU), lymphocytes (LYM), platelets (PLT), and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significant only in B or C AL grades. Among them, only three indicators were identified as significant for predicting AL when assessed 24 h before the onset of this complication, namely LYM (threshold value ≤ 0.97 × 103/mm3, sensitivity 66.7% and specificity 81.3%, p < 0.001); PLT (threshold value > > 257 103/mm3, sensitivity 58.6%, and specificity 86.7%, p < 0.001); and NLR (threshold value > 4.42, sensitivity 58.1%, and specificity 86.7%, p < 0.001). The three-factor model based on these selected indicators was set up, and the prognosis index (Prog) was proposed with the decision threshold Progcrit = 2.23. The sensitivity of the model was 80% (95% CI 51.9%-95.7%), and the specificity - 74.2% (67.6%-80.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the routine laboratory predictors used in the complex diagnosis of AL, B or C AL grades may be predicted allowing for the timely effective early diagnosis, medication, and surgical intervention..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental oncology\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"146-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2024.02.146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/exp-oncology.2024.02.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肿瘤结直肠科的一个重要问题是结直肠吻合口漏(AL),发生率为3.5%-21%。目的:通过建立实验室标记物的组合和阈值--炎症过程的预测因子,提高 AL 的早期诊断率:这项前瞻性研究于2020年至2023年进行,纳入了213名在新辅助化放疗后接受低位前切除术的直肠癌患者。在手术前和术后第3、5、7天对炎症生物标志物进行了评估:25例(11.74%)患者确诊为AL,严重程度分级如下:A(放射学)7 例(3.29%);B(临床)4 例(1.88%);C(临床表现,腹膜炎)11 例(5.16%);P(晚期)3 例(1.41%)。炎症反应的实验室指标,如С-反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、中性粒细胞(NEU)、淋巴细胞(LYM)、血小板(PLT)和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)的变化仅在 B 或 C AL 等级中显著。在这些指标中,只有三个指标在并发症发生前 24 小时进行评估时对预测 AL 有显著意义,它们是 LYM(阈值≤ 0.97 × 103/mm3,灵敏度为 66.7%,特异度为 81.3%,P<0.001);PLT(阈值>>257 103/mm3,灵敏度为 58.6%,特异度为 86.7%,P<0.001);NLR(阈值>4.42,灵敏度为 58.1%,特异度为 86.7%,P<0.001)。根据这些选定的指标建立了三因素模型,并提出了预后指数(Prog),决策阈值为 Progcrit = 2.23。该模型的灵敏度为 80%(95% CI 51.9%-95.7%),特异性为 74.2%(67.6%-80.2%):结论:根据用于 AL 复杂诊断的常规实验室预测指标,可以预测 AL 的 B 级或 C 级,以便及时有效地进行早期诊断、药物治疗和手术干预。
LABORATORY PREDICTORS FOR DIAGNOSING COLORECTAL ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE.
Background: An important concern in oncological coloproctology is colorectal anastomotic leakage (AL), which occurs in 3.5%-21% of patients. Predicting the occurrence of failure based on the results of laboratory markers can be decisive for the treatment of this complication.
Aim: To improve the early diagnosis of AL by establishing combinations and threshold values of laboratory markers - predictors of the inflammatory process.
Materials and methods: The prospective study, conducted from 2020 to 2023, included 213 rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The inflammatory biomarkers were assessed before surgery and on the 3rd, 5th, and 7th days of the postoperative period.
Results: AL diagnosed in 25 (11.74%) patients by the grade of severity was as follows: A (radiological) in 7 (3.29%) patients; B (clinical) - 4 (1.88%); C (clinically expressed, peritonitis) - 11 (5.16%), and P (late) - 3 (1.41%) patients. The changes in the laboratory indicators of the inflammatory response such as С-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), the counts of neutrophils (NEU), lymphocytes (LYM), platelets (PLT), and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significant only in B or C AL grades. Among them, only three indicators were identified as significant for predicting AL when assessed 24 h before the onset of this complication, namely LYM (threshold value ≤ 0.97 × 103/mm3, sensitivity 66.7% and specificity 81.3%, p < 0.001); PLT (threshold value > > 257 103/mm3, sensitivity 58.6%, and specificity 86.7%, p < 0.001); and NLR (threshold value > 4.42, sensitivity 58.1%, and specificity 86.7%, p < 0.001). The three-factor model based on these selected indicators was set up, and the prognosis index (Prog) was proposed with the decision threshold Progcrit = 2.23. The sensitivity of the model was 80% (95% CI 51.9%-95.7%), and the specificity - 74.2% (67.6%-80.2%).
Conclusion: Based on the routine laboratory predictors used in the complex diagnosis of AL, B or C AL grades may be predicted allowing for the timely effective early diagnosis, medication, and surgical intervention..