二尖瓣与主动脉/肺动脉速度-时间积分比是超声心动图评估严重孤立性二尖瓣反流的一个简单、可行和准确的判别指标。

Nitesh Nerlekar, Satish Ramkumar, Paul Maggiore, Justin Teng, Cengiz Cimenkaya, Kim Kuy Be, Angus Baumann, Stephen J Nicholls, Stuart Moir
{"title":"二尖瓣与主动脉/肺动脉速度-时间积分比是超声心动图评估严重孤立性二尖瓣反流的一个简单、可行和准确的判别指标。","authors":"Nitesh Nerlekar, Satish Ramkumar, Paul Maggiore, Justin Teng, Cengiz Cimenkaya, Kim Kuy Be, Angus Baumann, Stephen J Nicholls, Stuart Moir","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03249-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Echocardiographic quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) remains challenging, requiring dedicated image acquisition, and is limited by potential error from geometric assumptions of annular dimensions. Volume is a product of area and flow and assuming proportional mitral/aortic areas, an increased mitral-inflow volume compared to LV/RV-outflow semi-quantitatively represents greater MR regurgitant volume. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the mitral-aortic velocity-time integral(VTI) ratio in isolated MR. We also investigated the use of the mitral-pulmonary VTI ratio as an alternative in clinical situations where the LV outflow tract(LVOT) VTI could not be used. We reviewed 166 consecutive patients (33%, n = 54 severe MR by multi-parameter integrated expert opinion). Pulsed wave Doppler VTI at the mitral leaflet tips and the left ventricular outflow and continuous-wave Doppler of the RV outflow tract were measured individually and independently by blinded readers(expert and trainee status) to derive the ratio. Receiver operator characteristic area under the curve(AUC) comparison was calculated and compared with effective regurgitant orifice area(EROA > 40 mm), regurgitant volume(RVol > 60mL), vena contracta(VC > 0.7 cm), E-velocity > 1.2 cm, systolic flow reversal(SFR), left atrial and ventricular dilatation. Increasing ratio was associated with severe MR(AUC 0.94) with optimal threshold defined at 1.3. This provided significant discrimination for severe MR(AUC 0.81) compared to EROA(0.68), VC(0.52), LV dilatation(0.69), LA dilatation(0.70), SFR(0.73), E-velocity(0.68) all p < 0.05, with sensitivity 82% and specificity 94%. The mitral-pulmonary VTI ratio demonstrated similar discrimination(AUC 0.92) with optimal threshold defined at 1.14. Excellent inter-observer reproducibility(intra-class correlation 0.97) was seen between trainee and expert readers. There was no difference in AUC comparison by MR mechanism or patient rhythm. The mitral-aortic and mitral-pulmonary VTI ratios are simple, geometric-free parameters feasibly reproducible from routine echocardiographic datasets and are excellent discriminative tools for severe MR. Readers should consider integration of this parameter in routine reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"2459-2467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mitral to aortic/pulmonary velocity-time integral ratio is a simple, feasible and accurate discriminator for echocardiographic evaluation of severe isolated mitral regurgitation.\",\"authors\":\"Nitesh Nerlekar, Satish Ramkumar, Paul Maggiore, Justin Teng, Cengiz Cimenkaya, Kim Kuy Be, Angus Baumann, Stephen J Nicholls, Stuart Moir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-024-03249-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Echocardiographic quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) remains challenging, requiring dedicated image acquisition, and is limited by potential error from geometric assumptions of annular dimensions. Volume is a product of area and flow and assuming proportional mitral/aortic areas, an increased mitral-inflow volume compared to LV/RV-outflow semi-quantitatively represents greater MR regurgitant volume. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the mitral-aortic velocity-time integral(VTI) ratio in isolated MR. We also investigated the use of the mitral-pulmonary VTI ratio as an alternative in clinical situations where the LV outflow tract(LVOT) VTI could not be used. We reviewed 166 consecutive patients (33%, n = 54 severe MR by multi-parameter integrated expert opinion). Pulsed wave Doppler VTI at the mitral leaflet tips and the left ventricular outflow and continuous-wave Doppler of the RV outflow tract were measured individually and independently by blinded readers(expert and trainee status) to derive the ratio. Receiver operator characteristic area under the curve(AUC) comparison was calculated and compared with effective regurgitant orifice area(EROA > 40 mm), regurgitant volume(RVol > 60mL), vena contracta(VC > 0.7 cm), E-velocity > 1.2 cm, systolic flow reversal(SFR), left atrial and ventricular dilatation. Increasing ratio was associated with severe MR(AUC 0.94) with optimal threshold defined at 1.3. This provided significant discrimination for severe MR(AUC 0.81) compared to EROA(0.68), VC(0.52), LV dilatation(0.69), LA dilatation(0.70), SFR(0.73), E-velocity(0.68) all p < 0.05, with sensitivity 82% and specificity 94%. The mitral-pulmonary VTI ratio demonstrated similar discrimination(AUC 0.92) with optimal threshold defined at 1.14. Excellent inter-observer reproducibility(intra-class correlation 0.97) was seen between trainee and expert readers. There was no difference in AUC comparison by MR mechanism or patient rhythm. The mitral-aortic and mitral-pulmonary VTI ratios are simple, geometric-free parameters feasibly reproducible from routine echocardiographic datasets and are excellent discriminative tools for severe MR. Readers should consider integration of this parameter in routine reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2459-2467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618309/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03249-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03249-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二尖瓣反流(MR)的超声心动图定量仍具有挑战性,需要专门的图像采集,并受限于瓣环尺寸的几何假定所产生的潜在误差。容积是面积和血流的乘积,假设二尖瓣/主动脉面积成比例,二尖瓣流入容积与左心室/左心室流出容积相比的增加半定量地代表了更大的二尖瓣反流容积。因此,我们研究了二尖瓣-主动脉速度-时间积分(VTI)比值在孤立 MR 中的可行性和诊断性能。我们还研究了在无法使用左心室流出道(LVOT)VTI 的临床情况下,使用二尖瓣-肺动脉 VTI 比值作为替代的方法。我们对 166 例连续患者(33%,n = 54 例重度 MR,多参数综合专家意见)进行了复查。二尖瓣瓣叶尖端和左心室流出道的脉冲波多普勒 VTI 以及左心室流出道的连续波多普勒均由盲人(专家和受训者身份)单独独立测量,以得出比值。计算接收器操作者特征曲线下面积(AUC),并与有效反流孔面积(EROA > 40 mm)、反流容积(RVol > 60 mL)、收缩静脉(VC > 0.7 cm)、E-速度 > 1.2 cm、收缩期血流逆转(SFR)、左心房和左心室扩张进行比较。比值增大与严重 MR 相关(AUC 0.94),最佳阈值定义为 1.3。与 EROA(0.68)、VC(0.52)、LV 扩张(0.69)、LA 扩张(0.70)、SFR(0.73)、E-速度(0.68)相比,这对重度 MR(AUC 0.81)具有明显的区分度,所有 p 均为 0.9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The mitral to aortic/pulmonary velocity-time integral ratio is a simple, feasible and accurate discriminator for echocardiographic evaluation of severe isolated mitral regurgitation.

Echocardiographic quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) remains challenging, requiring dedicated image acquisition, and is limited by potential error from geometric assumptions of annular dimensions. Volume is a product of area and flow and assuming proportional mitral/aortic areas, an increased mitral-inflow volume compared to LV/RV-outflow semi-quantitatively represents greater MR regurgitant volume. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the mitral-aortic velocity-time integral(VTI) ratio in isolated MR. We also investigated the use of the mitral-pulmonary VTI ratio as an alternative in clinical situations where the LV outflow tract(LVOT) VTI could not be used. We reviewed 166 consecutive patients (33%, n = 54 severe MR by multi-parameter integrated expert opinion). Pulsed wave Doppler VTI at the mitral leaflet tips and the left ventricular outflow and continuous-wave Doppler of the RV outflow tract were measured individually and independently by blinded readers(expert and trainee status) to derive the ratio. Receiver operator characteristic area under the curve(AUC) comparison was calculated and compared with effective regurgitant orifice area(EROA > 40 mm), regurgitant volume(RVol > 60mL), vena contracta(VC > 0.7 cm), E-velocity > 1.2 cm, systolic flow reversal(SFR), left atrial and ventricular dilatation. Increasing ratio was associated with severe MR(AUC 0.94) with optimal threshold defined at 1.3. This provided significant discrimination for severe MR(AUC 0.81) compared to EROA(0.68), VC(0.52), LV dilatation(0.69), LA dilatation(0.70), SFR(0.73), E-velocity(0.68) all p < 0.05, with sensitivity 82% and specificity 94%. The mitral-pulmonary VTI ratio demonstrated similar discrimination(AUC 0.92) with optimal threshold defined at 1.14. Excellent inter-observer reproducibility(intra-class correlation 0.97) was seen between trainee and expert readers. There was no difference in AUC comparison by MR mechanism or patient rhythm. The mitral-aortic and mitral-pulmonary VTI ratios are simple, geometric-free parameters feasibly reproducible from routine echocardiographic datasets and are excellent discriminative tools for severe MR. Readers should consider integration of this parameter in routine reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信